Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

rense.com
Senator Leahy's Obamination -
A Vermont View
Obama's attack dog is top saboteur of
Bush-Cheney impeachment drive

By Bruce Marshall
4-11-8
 
The recent call by Vermont's senior Bush and Cheney protector, that sacrosanct liberal saint and war pork procurer Senator Patrick 'Paddy Warbucks' Leahy, demanding that Hillary Clinton to drop out of the race for the Democratic nomination, demonstrates the desperation of these elitist donkeys determined to destroy not only the party but our nation. The Obama campaign is essentially a seductive and dangerous virus, protecting and hedging the needs of Wall Street, in this time of catastrophic economic crisis. Senator Leahy seeks to destroy any opposition to this infection afforded by debate on the real issues within the party. Asking Senator Clinton to drop out of the race is insane. The arguments that Leahy uses all apply to Obama in spades. In all fairness, the person who should really drop out besides Obama, is Leahy, out of the Senate and politics. Considering all of the service Senator Leahy has provided Bush and Cheney, as longstanding leader of the token opposition; may he be tarred and feathered with the truth. 
 
Leahy's image as the fearless chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is a fraud that covers up his malfeasance. Leahy's coming out so strongly for Obama necessitates that people wake up to the reality of what this endorsement portends and who Obama actually represents. Understanding what Leahy really is all about will help to demonstrate and reveal the nature of the danger inherent in the Obama operation, along with the utter hypocrisy that is tolerated and tragically goes largely unexamined within the Democratic Party. A Vermont perspective on the worshiped senior Senator is one that needs to be recognized if we are to prevent the continuation and escalation of the Bush/Cheney horror with the Brzezinski-Wall Street Manchurian deception ploy represented by Obama.
 
The legal term with which to describe Senator Leahy's performance as Senator is misprision of treason through obstruction of justice as being an accessory after the fact. Misprision refers to Leahy's being aware of a multitude of treasonous crimes against which he refuses to act, to the dismay of many of his constituents. There is a nexus of factors which demonstrate Senator Leahy's dereliction of his duty at this time of ongoing crisis. He is seemingly immune to criticism because of his martyr status as recipient of one of the September-October 2001 anthrax letters. A lot of Leahy's work on the Judiciary has been a form of posturing, for in essence Bush has always gotten his way. 
 
Up here in Vermont, a very good expose of Leahy has appeared in the very popular paper, Seven Days. That article dubbed the sanctimonious Senator 'Paddy Warbucks' for the amount of pork that Leahy has liberally brought home to defense contractors in Vermont like General Dynamics. War is good for Leahy's real constituents, whom he rewards quite well. The type of reform that Leahy wants and supports is the privatization of the military, and it is no coincidence that this is one of the pet projects of the fascist Middlebury College alum Felix Rohatyn, the dirty Democratic Party moneybags, who along with the Republican godfather George Schultz is pushing military privatization. Maybe this is why Obama refuses to pledge that he will oust Blackwater from Iraq, which Clinton says she will do. I can personally attest that a gatekeepers within Leahy's office, his Vermont chief of staff Chuck Ross, refused to do anything about an article on this that I personally handed to Leahy in 2006 at a campaign fundraiser for Peter Welch, the totally ineffective Congressional Representative from Vermont, another Obama supporter and left border guard for Bush and Cheney.
 
Leahy and his friends have worked tirelessly to checkmate the grass roots pro-impeachment agitation here in Vermont, which has been the strongest of any state. It is well recognized that Leahy was behind the Democratic Party establishment's refusal to uphold the Constitution through impeachment. Even the liberal icon Bernie Sanders, more social climber than socialist, refused to lift a finger for impeachment when he was our congressman. This refusal to work for impeachment was an insult and an affront to tens of thousands of Vermonters who have contributed to our strong grassroots movement for impeachment, both through Town Meeting Resolutions and through the base of the Democratic Party. In public meetings, the ultra-radical Bernie would become quite annoyed when he was asked about impeachment.
 
It was Senator Leahy who repeatedly led the charge against the impeachment drive in Vermont based on article 603 of Thomas Jefferson's House of Representatives rulebook. Jefferson realized that Congress could easily become corrupted and fall under the sway of the Executive branch. Impeachment is a vital check and balance of our Constitutional system. Jefferson's manual states that bills of impeachment can be introduced to the Speaker of the House from State Legislatures and Grand Juries. The impeachment movement almost prevailed in Vermont: it did pass the State Senate, but was blocked by the Vermont House Speaker Gay Symington, who admitted to Craig Hill (who ran for Senate against Leahy in 2004) that Leahy was the main behind the scenes saboteur of impeachment. Even the duplicitous Symington had to concede that Leahy had issued a standing order that no impeachment motion would be forwarded from Montpelier to Congress. The Leahy's operative Gay Symington, later confessed to Craig Hill with tears in her eyes that her own husband had berated her in front of their children as 'your mommy, the protector of Bush."
 
This story was played out in a very public setting in spring 2006, in what I dubbed the "Randolph Massacre". This was a meeting of the State Democratic Party oversight group consisting from officials from various counties in the state. The key item on the agenda was 603 impeachment, since a majority of the counties had voted for it. The meeting, which heard the voices of many in the impeachment movement, with ample press coverage, saw the impeachment argument viciously defamed by Leahy's top aide in the State, Chuck Ross, who just happened to hold a position on this board. Chuck Ross argued Leahy's brief against impeachment by attacking the legitimacy not only of Jefferson's manual, but of the Constitution itself. This was a despicable example of how influence and sophistry was used by Democratic Party poo-bas to deprive citizens of their ability to fight back against the Bush Unitary Executive.
 
The people were rising up for impeachment precisely because the Democrats, mislead by the likes of Leahy, had failed to adequately challenge Bush and Cheney on war, torture, and the police state. The effete snob Senator Kerry refused to fight Bush in 2004, which is typical of the whole defeatist attitude since 2000. In 2006 the antiwar majority delivered the Congress to the Democrats with the express purpose of stopping the war, but this was betrayed by Pelosi. Now Leahy, Kerry, and Pelosi are all supporting Obama, who has raised their traditional cowardice, appeasement, and treachery to the status of positive bi-partisan virtues.
 
Just after the "Randolph Massacre" that I went up to Chuck Ross, the Leahy operative who had stopped the move for impeachment. I wanted to ask Chuck a few questions. Chuck started to say that I was rude to have called out for 9/11 Truth in the middle of Peter Welch's speech at his fundraiser, when Welch was reading out the typical laundry list on Bush. In response, I asked Chuck what he thought about 9/11 and the way Bush was using it. Chuck replied, "Not much". I replied: "Interesting, Chuck -- you know that is the only thing Bush ran his reelection on, the history-changing event, and you think 'not much.'" Knowing that this was hardly the case, I asked Chuck why he and his boss had so little interest in 9/11. I told him that 9/11 was not confined to that date, but that it came with a calling card, and that the message of the anthrax letters was in essence "Shut up or you're dead." When I said this, Chuck literally started jumping up and down, pointing fingers, raving "How dare you talk about my boss like that!", "You're crazy," etc, as he started to run out of the building. That really said it all.
 
The fact of the matter is that this is exactly the problem in our country; our nation's supposed leaders have been compromised by homicidal intimidation and blackmail. One would think that a Senator Leahy, or then Representative Sanders would be eager to see a grassroots movement like that for impeachment grow amongst their constituency, that this is what a politician needs in order to go forward. One would think, but that is not the case. No: Leahy wants us to just forget, that is why he is supporting Obama, the easy choice for those who do not want to confront reality, but prefer to retreat into unreality. 
 
The Obamination of Leahy may go much further. Cathy O'Brian talks about Leahy in her book with Mark Phillips entitled Trance Formation of America: The True Life Story of A CIA Mind Control Slave. To quote, "Leahy was unquestionably one of the most intelligent criminals of this entire Shadow Government." She describers one of her torturers, Leahy, thus: "His carefully contrived chameleon-like characteristics provided him the latitude of appearing to share the principles and beliefs of whomever he was masterfully manipulating on both a national and international level." This profile does fit such a master of deception. That Leahy has not attempted court action against this book is quite strange. The tone of this book plays right into the more sordid details concerning Obama and his closeted sexuality, which might reveal that he truly is not his own person. 
 
Our right to be secure in our own persons is one of the reasons why people are so opposed to the machinations of the Bush regime after 9/11. Certainly the anthrax letters did succeed in pressuring Senator Leahy, from acting against the Patriot Act I and II and the launching of the "War on Terror." It was the Military Commissions Act which did away with the right of Habeas Corpus. Now Leahy calls for the Habeas Corpus Restoration Act, of which outspoken Vermonter William Carlotti says: "The words of your much promoted Act kill the writ of Habeas Corpus." Deception is the name of the game and Leahy has been a great deceiver to many. Why will he not question the 9/11 Commission findings even though he has been formally challenged in 2004 when Craig Hill ran against Leahy for Senate, pointing out on C-Span 2 the issue of the collapse of building 7 and other anomalies. Vermonters have very politely petitioned Leahy about 9/11 anomalies, but he refuses to consider the issue. 
 
Now Senator Leahy is using false intelligence to try to abort and sabotage the presidential nomination process. Leahy knows Obama is really losing, and so spouts the call that Senator Clinton leave the race immediately. Of course Hillary has no intention of leaving the race. Leahy is acting as a spokesman for the liberal elite which is horrified by the fact that Senator Clinton has a much better chance of winning the general election than Obama by representing the potential for a revival of the New Deal policies of FDR in this Bush depression. Vermont voters will forget neither Leahy's treachery on impeachment and 9/11 truth, nor his tawdry role as a hit man for the Trilateral puppet Obama.
 

 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros