- The policy of Total Spectrum Dominance promoted by the
Neocons does not refer to far away lands only -- to unruly Afghanistan
or disobedient France. It refers to you. It is you, Americans, they want
to dominate totally; by controlling your sexual lifestyle and punishing
every deviation of thought and act.
-
- The Bible would never have taken off if US law enforcement
agencies had been around. They would smother the sublime quest of mankind
in its infancy, sending the twelve sons of Israel into foster care in Sodom,
for their good old sire had four wives and loved them all. On second thought,
the Bible would not even have come that far either, as their ancestor Abraham,
this fountain of our faith, would have been locked up for the same sin.
That is, if he had not been locked up earlier for teaching his children
at home, instead of sending them to the Pharaoh's school, or for giving
birth at home. Every aspect of normal behaviour mankind was used to, has
become criminalised in the new American legality.
-
- In beginning of April, hamfisted Texan police swooped
on a remote Mormon ranch, and arrested the men and carried away the women
and their children and babies, separating them from their mothers. A judge
allowed separating even nursing breastfed babies, giving them to foster
care.
-
- This snatching case, where the police took away 437 children
and babies from their parents who preferred to live an alternative communal
family lifestyle, has advanced the US well beyond any grim vision of totalitarianism
ever envisaged by real-life politicians. Americans have already entered
the realm of extreme social engineering trod by the LSD writer Aldous Huxley.
In that realm of the United Totalitarian States, happy families are being
broken up, and hundreds of babies and children are given into adoption
to single gender couples. People have lost their children to the state
for failing to expose them to the moronising power of the TV[1], or refusing
to send them to the state schools. Some have lost their lives as
well: in Utah, a John Singer was shot dead for trying to keep his children
out of school. The holocaust of Waco with its dozens of parents and children
murdered for no sin but their sturdy independence was just the first swallow
of elimination of private life in America.
-
- The Texas police had used a false claim in order to justify
their action. They (http://www.rense.com/general81/flads.htm) claimed a
member of the family, one Sarah Barlow, had lodged a complaint. Soon it
became clear that the complaint was made by a delusionary outsider woman
with a history of false reports, and probably in cahoots with police. There
never was a Sarah Barlow. The good wives and daughters of the Texan dissidents
were placed under terrible pressure, amounting to torture: they were not
even allowed to nurse their babies, unless they bear false witness against
their husbands and fathers. It is amazing that all of them withstood the
torture and remained faithful. What made the Texan police use such extreme
measures against people who peacefully carried on with their lives?
-
- There is a good reason for this onslaught on privacy:
The policy of Total Spectrum Dominance promoted by the Neocons does not
refer to far away lands only, to unruly Afghanistan or disobedient France.
It refers to you. It is you, Americans, they want to dominate totally;
by controlling your lifestyle and punishing every free thought and act.
And in order to dominate, they need to smash all compartments; first of
all, Family. Nothing may stay between an individual and the State. By way
of projection, your ideologists ascribe this attitude to your erstwhile
enemies, Hitler and Stalin, but as a matter of fact both arch-villains
were strongest supporters of family. Stalin terminated the free run of
wild-eyed feminists he inherited from the Revolution days; while even today,
any reference to family values is considered "pro-Nazi" in Zionist-occupied
Merkel's Germany. It is to the third force of liberal totalitarianism that
we owe this last and definite attack on Family.
-
- In a normal world, the Texas kidnapping would be condemned
by every voice until the children were free and back in the custody of
their parents, until the kidnappers were safely locked in jail. Instead,
the American papers and internet sites bother with Tibetan monks' inalienable
right to own serfs and the evil Chinamen's interfering with this right.
They discuss whether the Japanese may eat whales (no, they may not) and
whether the US corporations may consume millions of starving people by
turning their food into fuel (yes, they may). At the same time, they allow
the oldest and most natural freedom of forming family life to be eroded
and undermined. Why don't presidential candidates Obama, Clinton and McCain
demand safe release of the Texas prisoners before the Bush regime
rides into sunrise to impose his version of permissible intercourse on
the rest of mankind?
-
- The enemies of your freedom, the proprietors of your
media, have prepared for this onslaught for a long time. They spread malicious
rumours of frequent parental child abuse to undermine the natural tie between
children and parents. They constructed a fictitious offence of flirting
with a girl and called it "harassment". They invented a "plague
of the 20th century", AIDS, though this malady occupies umpteenth
place in the list of dangerous diseases, well after obesity. They promoted
and elevated homosexual activity on their TV channels and in official propaganda
all that in order to eliminate family and turn you into obedient
tools in their hands.
-
- They preached to bewildered mankind that whoever objects
to their apotheosis of gay love is but a bigot interfering with a question
of personal choice between consenting adults. Now, in Texas this sophism
has come to naught: a group of consenting adults were arrested and imprisoned
for their personal choice not for having wild sex, or running orgies,
or for disturbing the peace, but for forming a steady and caring relationship
of polygamous marriage, like the one approved by the Hebrews of old and
by the entire East, by the Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists of our own day, in
short, by the vast majority of mankind. If there is narrow-minded bigotry,
it is the American persecution of alternative families. Alleged persecution
of pederasts in Iran is peanuts comparing with this attack on the most
traditional way of family life in America.
-
- Polygamy or monogamy? This is ultimately a question of
local custom and personal preference. The East allows for polygamy, the
West allows for sodomy. The East is not worried by age difference, the
West lives in fear of underage wedlock. Apparently, the Eastern gentleman
prefers marital bliss with a few nubile beauties at once; the Anglo-American
man likes to be buggered by an elderly gentleman. For this reason, the
Anglo-American man is forever trying to move eastwards, to escape into
the realm of sexual freedom, or if this man is content with his part
to conquer and eliminate this realm. This could be a good explanation
of MiddleEastern wars, the War of Pederasts against Polygamists, surely
not a worse one than oil or Jews: in the unforgettable words of George
W. Bush, "they [the Americans] attack us [the East] because they hate
and envy our freedom", that is, the Eastern freedom to marry a few
wonderful women without going through divorce.
-
- The sturdy villagers of my Palestine do practice polygamy,
as I described elsewhere: "I stayed at Hassan's hospitable house,
built on his own land in Yanoun. Hassan is over eighty, a strong and stately
old man in grey galabiye and abaya, a sort of full-length dress with a
mantle on top. His galabiye is girdled up by a broad leather belt, and
a sharp short knife hangs on it. His hands are of good shape and feel as
hard as if they were chisel led from local stone when he shakes my hand.
Last year Hajj Hassan made the pilgrimage to Mecca, but he is first and
foremost a peasant. Our Lord and Lady of Palestine blessed Hassan. He married,
and had a few sons and daughters, and then he took a second wife, and had
had some more, until he was surrounded by twelve strong sons and pretty
daughters. His spacious three-storied house with smaller outbuildings can
compete with the manor of the Beg. There are many olive trees he planted
on the slopes, and there is a vine with heavy yellow grapes in front of
his house. In the morning the second wife of Hassan, a tall and dignified
woman in her sixties, brought me this thick greenish juice of olive together
with a big and round country bread, hubz baladi, she had baked half an
hour ago. Hard white goat cheese, salty thyme, a bunch of grapes and a
glass of sweetish tea with maramiye (sage) leaves completed the meal. Hassan's
first and elderly wife sat with us, basking at the winter sun."[2]
-
- It is normal to have two wives, and it is normal to have
one wife, and it is normal to have no wife at all, as so many monks choose.
Moreover, it is normal to have two husbands, as the mountain folk of Tibet,
Ladakh and Nepal do. (In the West, it is called ménage a trois,
and this arrangement allowed Lily Brick to live happily with Vladimir Mayakovski
and Osip Brick.) Every such arrangement is normal, if agreed by the involved
parties. What is abnormal that's state interference in the unions of men
and women.
-
- The American State pays too much attention to the sex
life of its subjects. In normal circumstances, the stained dress of Mlle.
Levinsky would cause some anxiety only for her dry cleaner; the escapade
of Mr Spitzler would annoy his wife only, while the extended family lifestyle
of Texan commune would be just their own business. Until the 1960s, the
police and FBI used to arrest men and women of different races who dared
to congregate in bed. It is still embedded in American conscience.
Recently, a young black American was sentenced to ten years of jail for
having oral sex with a young white girl.
-
- Another sexual obsession of American authorities is "child
pornography" interpreted in the widest possible way. FBI agents-provocateurs
email Japanese anime depicting young girls, and then happily assault the
receivers of the emails. Often it has a clear political undertone: an American
dissident, an objector to Iraqi war, Kevin
Strom, was recently sentenced to two years of jail for having an email
with a girlie picture (actually, that of Brooke Shields, the actress) on
his computer. The American Gestapo would lock up Benvenuto Cellini, the
great Florentine, for his enticing hermaphrodite child, and probably the
visitors to Louvre where the statue is presented, as well, just for looking
at it.
-
- In the eternal search for the "hidden hand",
men have produced many unlikely candidates, from the Masons to the Wise
Elders of Zion to the Gray Aliens and Lizards, or even as the Russian esoteric
Alexandre Dougin proposed in jest, a secret ancient order of women-priestesses
pulling and pushing behind the scenes. In a similar vein, tongue-in-cheek,
one can imagine a cabal of old man-hating butch dykes, or even eunuchs
(like in medieval China or Byzantium) forming the hidden US government,
directing the FBI to snatch children and destroy families in Texas, sending
Bush to subdue the Middle East and kill off the men both Oriental
and American their natural competitors for female charms.
-
- We in Israel have been ruled by our Wise Hags of Zion
from Golda Meir up till the present president of the Supreme Court, Dorit
Beinish, and what we do today, America repeats tomorrow, as <http://www.counterpunch.com/niva04282008.html>Steve
Niva noted in his fine essay The New Walls of Baghdad, subtitled The Israeli
Model Surges Toward Iraq. "What we are seeing in Iraq today has much
to do with a deeper and far-reaching "Israelization" of U.S.
military strategy and tactics. Iraq has become virtually caged in a carapace
of concrete walls and razor wire, reinforced by an aerial occupation from
the sky, like Gaza, where 1.5 million Palestinians are now living within
an enclosed cage, while Israel controls access to the essentials of life
through high-tech border terminals and unleashes "penetration raids"
and airborne "targeted killings" when resistance is offered."
-
- These imaginary ruling harpies can't comprehend that
women are naturally attracted to men.
-
- There is a new Israeli law saying that every act of intercourse
between man and woman is coercive, and if they work in one company, it
always constitutes harassment. In short, there should be no flirtation,
no sex either. An Israeli couple had a long and tumultuous relationship
for a few years, making love everywhere from the company's strong room
to its computer centre, but, when the relationship soured, the woman brought
a complaint for harassment and coercion, and walked away with a cool hundred
thousand dollars. An even better and newer Israeli bill proposes to fine
every customer of a prostitute by a flat sum of ten thousand dollars
in favour of the prostitute.
-
- Likewise, the American imitators of the Israeli model
can't comprehend why some women prefer to share one man with a few others
or why some men may share one woman with others, as Abbe Prevost
wrote of Manon Lescault. They will forever ruin your lives, corralling
you toward the genderless anti-utopia of Huxley.
-
- As much as one feels sorry for imprisoned Palestine,
devastated Iraq and for threatened Iran, I can't help but feel sorry for
you, Americans, the first victims and the first slaves of the New World
Order your country tries to impose on the rest of the world. We are together
in this fight, we have one enemy, and this enemy is not in North Korea,
but in Washington, DC.
-
- May 6, 2008, Jaffa Srinagar
-
- Recommended reading:
-
- FLDS Raid - A Dangerous Legal Precedent, By Joel Skousen
-
- 4-26-8
- http://www.rense.com/general81/flads.htm
-
- [1] Judges in the Texas snatching case and in other cases
referred to children being kept away from TV as one of the motives for
taking child into state care.
-
- [2] From "Reading Douglas Adams in Yanoun".
-
- _
|