- "Es wird daran festgehalten, daß das Deutsche
Reich den Zusammenbruch 1945 überdauert hat und weder mit der Kapitulation
noch durch die Ausübung fremder Staatsgewalt in Deutschland durch
die Alliierten noch später untergegangen ist; es besitzt nach wie
vor Rechtsfähigkeit, ist allerdings als Gesamtstaat mangels Organisation
nicht handlungsfähig. Die BRD ist nicht Rechtsnachfolger des Deutschen
Reiches."
-
- - Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court),
31 July 1973 (Urteile 2 Bvl.6/56; 2 BvF 1/73; 2 BvR 373/83; BVGE 2,266
(277); 3, 288 (319ff; 5.85) 126; 6, 309, 336 und 363)
- ----------
-
- Before responding to Mark Weber's piece "Is the
German Federal Republic Legitimate?" (Rense.com, various sites, 17
December 2005), I thought I should first do him the honour of reading some
of his work. I can therefore say on an informed basis that I fully appreciate
his comments and acknowledge that he is infinitely more qualified than
I to make a rounded assessment of German history. His scholasticism is
superlative.
-
- However, I must scold him for confusing legality with
legitimacy and for implying that I am a sophist and a purveyor of false
hope. A sophist is a Pharisee, someone who uses a specious line of reasoning
to distort the truth or construct a legal argument that deviates from the
spirit of the law. I have done no such thing.
-
- I have simply reiterated in plain words information available
to anyone with an Internet connection or a Frankfurt University library
pass. Nothing I have said about the SHAEF laws, the German Reich or judgements
handed down by the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsrühe cannot
be found by anyone with a junior school reading age.
-
- On the issue of whether or not the Federal German Republic
is legal or illegal (as opposed to legitimate or illegitimate), my argument
set out in "Telling the Truth in the Realm of Lies" (Rense.com,
14 December 2005) remains verifiably correct.
-
- The Federal Republic of Germany is illegal. That's an
established fact. The illegality of the republic and the current regime
is not only enshrined in the SHAEF laws, which are still in force; it has
been acknowledged in the form of a ruling by the Federal Constitutional
Court: The BRD is not the legal successor of the German Reich.
-
- What I think Mark is saying can be summated thus: The
Federal Republic, although technically illegal, is legitimate insofar as
the German people seem like it that way.
-
- So, if acquiescence equates to acceptance, then Mark
is perhaps correct to say that the current regime seems to be legitimate
in terms of public approval. But we should also remember that the German
people were never given the opportunity to accept or reject the Grundgesetz
(Basic Law) in the form of a referendum. Until present arrangements collapse,
we are left in the dark as to the will of the people, who have never known
any different and are largely still ignorant about the existence of the
German Reich.
-
- Originally, the Basic Law was to have been called the
Temporary Law and it is still seen as such by the legal establishment.
It can never take on the aspect of permanence because it is a substitute
for a real constitution, which can only be enacted with the full restoration
of Germany's legal parallel state, the German Reich.
-
- The one man who knows about this more than anyone else
alive today is Wolfgang Gerhard Günter Ebel, who emphatically told
American Free Press reporter Christopher Bollyn: "The German government
is illegal and what they do has no basis in law." (Rense.com, "Germany
Still in Juridicial Limbo", 15 December 2005). He also maintains,
with sound legal arguments, that the Basic Law was wholly invalidated with
re-unification. It had served its temporary purpose.
-
- Why is this important? The German people have been vilified,
demonised, libelled and slandered. Their nation was deliberately targeted
for destruction by the Zionist and globalist elites twice in the last century,
allowing the occult phoenix of the European superstate to rise from the
ashes of the Dresden holocaust and a shattered, guilt-ridden social landscape.
-
- By design, the German people have been led to believe
that a yearning for national sovereignty and real independence is a manifestation
of fascism, not patriotism. What is legitimate and celebrated in the United
States and France as wholesome and socially desirable has been criminalised
in Germany, with illegal Zionist laws policing the national German psyche
and enforcing fearful self-censorship reinforced by Zionist "history"
books written after 1978, the year when tales of the Jewish "holocaust"
burst upon the television and newspaper scene following what appeared to
be a miraculously spontaneous bout of mass-remembering on the part of "holocaust
victims" and their claims lawyers.
-
- The law and its myriad of legalisms is the lifeblood
of Zionism. Without it, it is nothing. Why should anyone be discouraged
from using their laws against them where the opportunity to do so exists?
Mr Zündel not only has a "get out of jail free" card, he
is uniquely placed to collapse the Federal Republic and, with it, the European
Union.
-
- Mark Weber is one of the leading thinkers and historians
of our age, and I am honoured that he took the time to write a critical
appraisal of my call to arms. He correctly made the distinction between
legal and legitimate, the objective world and the subjective world. In
tipping the forelock at legitimacy, however, Mark is clearly stating that
a solution to our problems lies in collective action. This is where we
part company.
-
- I believe that history is made by brave individuals who,
with the help of God, are prepared to risk even their lives by declaring
the emperor to be naked. The truth of what they say can always be measured
in terms of the vitriol, slander, ridicule and savagery meted out to them
by their enemies.
-
- Such men are happy to go to their cross, because living
outside of the truth and denied the freedom to breathe without fear of
the government and its army of rapacious lawyers is simply unbearable.
Such men are prepared to forego the comforts and luxuries easily available
to those who "play the game" and live by the lie because they
have no desire to see their grandchildren and great-grandchildren live
in a false, hug-me squeeze-me, politically correct consumer dictatorship
of hollow fantasies and radically lowered expectations.
-
- Ernst Zündel is one such man; a heretic imprisoned
by judges who have no standing in law and on the basis of a constitutional
mandate that neither exists nor which derives substance from any real legal
state. Those who are happy to see him behind bars have no idea that they
will one day lose more than just their freedom of speech, freedom to enquire
and freedom to dissent; for the impending Zionist new world order will
take no prisoners.
-
- The Federal Republic of Germany is illegal and no one
can prove otherwise. In the name of truth and the freedom to think and
speak without government permission, let the fight begin.
-
- --------------------
- Michael James is a freelance journalist and translator,
resident in Germany since 1992.
|
