- Patrick Wood article follows below, but first a note from
the pit of despair:
-
- Either Barrak Obama or John McCain -- the choices
offered by our two-party system -- will win in November with a margin of
victory somewhere between zero and ten percent of the vote. Whoever is
running against them, Barr, McKinney, Ventura-Paul etc. will garner no
more than ten percent of the vote each. And again the electorate of the
world's oldest democracy will have spoken and the issue of leadership,
the question of who controls the strong executive branch of our government
will have been settled once and for all for the next four years. And
even if one or the other wins by what is declared to be a landslide --
the policies of the international bankers will continue to be the policies
of the United State exactly they have. No matter that the mouths of the
electorate have been taped closed and their eyes and ears covered with
24-7 virtual-reality headsets of total-emersion propaganda of that system
telling us each of the three Obama, McCain and Clinton
were the only choices possible for beating the "greater evil"
of the other two. The drama filled our eyes and ears. No other choices
were even considered by those who continuously wore their headsets. And
for those people who actually took their headsets off long enough to chat
with each other on the internet (where the banking interests also have
their well-organized network of infiltrating misinformationists,
of false-opposition sabotaging disorganizers and "false-Messiahs," to
ensure that no opposition gets organized or escapes stigma of having lunatics
within their ranks.
-
- Remember, the Rockefellers drive two cars, one with an
elephant hood ornament and the other with a donkey ornament. And each car
has had it's own chauffer to plot the route. One was named Kissinger and
the other Brzezinski. Kissinger was in the Defense Policy Planning Board
out of Paul Wolfowtiz's office in the Rumsfeld Pentagon, where Richard
Perle and other Rothschild and Rockefeller agents planned wars with Iraq
and Afghanistan in the months leading up to that day in September of 2001
when a false-flag attack killed Penagon auditors and members of the independent
office of Naval Intelligence while at the same time proving, by the fact
that they, although safely on the other side of the sprawling structure,
were "intended victims" of the attack. The other chauffer, Brzezinski,
for the last eight years has occasionally played the critic on minor questions,
and done so more and more as the election season developed and he emerged
in full chauffers livery to drive the Democrat limo. Once again we are
about to be taken for a ride by the Rockefeller interests.
-
- Patrick Wood wrote the following. For him Jimmy Carter
is the bad man and Jews don't exist -- so he is someone you can download
without any compatibility conflict with your brainwash headset. Mr. Wood
is out to force Obama to pick Hillary Clinton as his running mate (who
is not a Trilateral Commission Member) or else McCain. You will note that
Wood does not offer any alternative and he does not tell you what interests
are behind the commission. Of course he is right about Zbignew and this
Brzezinski quote: "international banks and multinational corporations
are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political
concepts of the nation-state" -- really do tell us everything we need
to know about the foreign policy mastermind of any future Obama presidency.
-
- The problem Wood discusses is that there is no alternative
to having a president following dictates of the Rockefellers -- he does
not tell anything about what the Rockefellers want or what international
financial interests they are allied with. And he does not recommend any
alternative course of action. All his article has done is remind you that
Brzezinski was brought to the White House by Jimmy Carter -- the essay
is essentially an attack on Carter using Brzezinski, whom most of his readers
already know is bad news, to tar the former President. The article
isn't about Obama at all -- its a hit piece on Carter -- and tacitly, on
Carter's recent criticism of Israel. (Carter, of course, had to take Brzezinski,
as part of the deal that let him become President -- just as Reagan had
to take George W. H. Bush as his running mate to satisfy the Rockefeller
faction of that time (then headed by Kissinger and Rockefeller order-follower President
Gerald Ford.)
-
- "I could have had a 'V-8' !!!
-
- Not really. You are too stupid and indolent -- a "V-8"
will always be beyond your reach. Warmed over Rockefeller piss is all you
will have to drink until you die. And I don't appreciate you for it, because
I am going to have to drink it with you. SO go ahead and stomp
on Jimmy Carter who criticizes Israel -- while I go figure out how best
to put the catastophe I know is only just begining out of my mind -- to
focus on the little sphere of my private life so I can make the debt
slave life as marginally pleasant as minding one's business and going along
with the program can make it. It's a hard adjustment to make, but the survival
of my family comes first. I've got to teach them to shove you
out of the way so they can get any handouts the elite are throwing our
way -- just like you do. Bob Bowman? Thomas Jefferson? I deny I ever
knew them. "Down with Jimmy Carter!!!!" .. and so to hell.
-
- Ol failure
- Yakima, Washington
-
- <mailto:oldickeastman@q.com>oldickeastman@q.com
-
-
- ====================
-
- Obama & McCain - Pawns Of The Global Elite?
-
- By Patrick Wood (Protege of the late Anthony Sutton)
-
- Will it matter if Obama or McCain are elected in November?
Hardly.
-
- Both are rigidly backed by important members of the Trilateral
Commission who hijacked the Executive Brach of the U.S. government starting
in 1976 with the election of Jimmy Carter.
-
-
- In Obama's case, Zbigniew Brzezinski (co-founder of the
Commission in 1973) is emerging as his principal advisor on foreign policy.
Ex-Fed Chairman Paul Volker has made a once-in-a-lifetime, glowing endorsement
of Obama. Madelyn Albright is seen sitting next to Obama in several conferences.
Shoot, even Jimmy Carter himself endorses Obama. All are top members of
the Commission.
-
- John McCain is being supported by several Trilateral
Commission giants including: Henry Kissinger, George Schultz, Lawrence
Eagleburger and Alexander Haig. All of these are ex-Secretaries of State
who issued a joint endorsement of McCain early-on in his campaign.
-
- And, unless Obama shoots both of his own feet (or...?)
before the general presidential election in November, he is most likely
to be the next president of the United States.
-
- You would think that Americans would want to know who
the "special interests" are that are embodied by this Trilateral
Commission, and what they intend to do or not do with America.
-
- What is the Trilateral Commission?
-
- The Trilateral Commission was founded by the persistent
maneuvering of David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1973. Rockefeller
was chairman of the ultra-powerful Chase Manhattan Bank, a director of
many major multinational corporations and "endowment funds" and
had long been a central figure in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Brzezinski, a brilliant prognosticator of one-world idealism, was
a professor at Columbia University and the author of several books that
have served as "policy guidelines" for the Trilateral Commission.
-
- Brzezinski served as the Commission's first executive
director from its inception in 1973 until late 1976 when he was appointed
by President Jimmy Carter as Assistant to the President for National
Security Affairs.
-
- The initial Commission membership was approximately three
hundred, with roughly one hundred each from Europe, Japan and North America.
Membership was also roughly divided between academics, politicians and
corporate magnates; these included international bankers, leaders of prominent
labor unions and corporate directors of media giants.
-
- The word commission was puzzling since it is
usually associated with instrumentalities set up by governments. It seemed
out of place with a so-called private group unless we could determine that
it really was an arm of a government - an unseen government, different
from the visible government in Washington. European and Japanese involvement
indicated a world government rather than a national government. We hoped
that the concept of a sub-rosa world government was just wishful thinking
on the part of the Trilateral Commissioners. The facts, however, lined
up with the fears of the pessimists.
-
- If the Council on Foreign Relations could be said to
be a spawning ground for the concepts of one-world idealism, then the Trilateral
Commission was the "task force" assembled to assault the beachheads.
Already the Commission had placed its members in the top posts the U.S.
had to offer.
-
- Jimmy Carter: The first Trilateral president
-
-
- President James Earl Carter, the country politician
who promised, "I will never lie to you," was chosen to join the
Commission by Brzezinski in 1973. It was Brzezinski, in
fact, who first identified Carter as presidential timber, and
subsequently educated him in economics, foreign policy, and the ins-and-outs
of world politics. UponCarter's election, Brzezinski was
appointed assistant to the president for national security matters. Commonly,
he was called the head of the National Security Council because he answered
only to the president - some said Brzezinski held the second
most powerful position in the U.S.
-
- Carter's running mate, Walter Mondale, was
also a member of the Commission. (If you are trying to calculate the odds
of three virtually unknown men, out of over sixty Commissioners from the
U.S., capturing the three most powerful positions in the land, don't bother.
Your calculations will be meaningless.)
-
- On January 7, 1977 Time Magazine, whose editor-in-chief, Hedley
Donovan was a powerful Trilateral, named President Carter "Man
of the Year." The sixteen-page article in that issue not only failed
to mention Carter's connection with the Commission but also stated
the following:
-
- "As he searched for Cabinet appointees, Carter seemed
at times hesitant and frustrated disconcertingly out of character. His
lack of ties to Washington and the Party Establishment - qualities that
helped raise him to the White House - carry potential dangers. He does
not know the Federal Government or the pressures it creates. He does not
really know the politicians whom he will need to help him run the country."
-
- Is this portrait of Carter as a political innocent
simply inaccurate or was it deliberately misleading? By December 25, 1976
- two weeks before the Time article appeared - Carter had
already chosen his cabinet. Three of his cabinet members - Cyrus Vance, Michael
Blumenthal, and Harold Brown - were Trilateral Commissioners;
and the other non-Commission members were not unsympathetic to Commission
objectives and operations. In addition, Carter had appointed
anotherfourteen Trilateral Commissioners to top government posts,
including:
-
- C. Fred Bergsten (Under Secretary of Treasury)
-
- James Schlesinger (Secretary of Energy)
-
- Elliot Richardson (Delegate to Law of the Sea)
-
- Leonard Woodcock (Chief envoy to China)
-
- Andrew Young (Ambassador to the United Nations).
-
- As of 25 December 1976, therefore, there were nineteen Trilaterals,
including Carter and Mondale, holding tremendous political
power. These presidential appointees represented almost one-third of the
Trilateral Commission members from the United States. The odds of that
happening "by chance" are beyond calculation!
-
- Realities of the New World Order
-
- In 1972, Brzezinski's wrote that "nation-state
as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal
creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are
acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts
of the nation-state."
-
- The late Senator Barry Goldwater (R-AZ) was one of a
very few people who understood what Brzezinski was alluding to, when he
issued a clear and precise warning in his 1979 book, With No Apologies:
-
- "The Trilateral Commission is international and
is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial
and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of
the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated
effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power - political,
monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical."
-
- Trilateral Entrenchment: 1980-2008
-
- Every Administration since Carter has had top-level Trilateral
Commission representation through the President or Vice-President, or both!
George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore and Dick Cheney are all members.
-
- In turn, these have appointed their Trilateral cronies
to top positions in their Administrations.
-
- For instance, six out of seven World Bank presidents
have been members of the Commission. Eight out of ten USTR's (U.S. Trade
Representative) have been members. Secretaries of State include Henry Kissinger,
Cyrus Vance, Alexander Haig, George Schultz, Lawrence Eagleburger, Warren
Christopher and Madeleine Albright. Yep, all members of the Trilateral
Commission.
-
- Follow the money, follow the power
-
- You decide which is scarier: Obama and Brzezinski or
McCain and Henry Kissinger?
-
- Either way, Americans will continue to lose...
-
- Every major crisis we face today is directly attributable
to policies put forth and executed by members of this Trilateral Commission:
Banking/lending/mortgage crisis, energy/gas price crisis, food/shortage/price
crisis.
-
- In addition, in the last fifteen to twenty years we have
lost of millions of prime manufacturing jobs to China, India and Mexico.
Our prime assets are being purchased by sovereign wealth funds and foreign
investors. Our currency has all but been destroyed throughout the world.
-
- Remember Brzezinski's vision that "international
banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that
are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state"?
-
- Well, that's been true enough. But, for all their acting
and planning at the expense of our own prosperity and sovereignty, who
wants or needs more of the same under Obama or McCain? With friends like
this, who needs enemies?
-
- For several Presidential elections now, this writer has
voted according to the philosophy of choosing the "lesser of two evils."
Never again!
-
- A vote for either Obama or McCain is a vote for the complete
destruction of America.
-
- Editor's note: For more information on globalization
and the global elite, please visit the author's website, <>www.AugustReview.com
-
-
- Patrick M. Wood is editor of <>The August
Review, which builds on his original research with the late Antony C. Sutton,
who was formerly a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution for War, Peace
and Revolution at Stanford University. Their 1977-1982 newsletter, Trilateral
Observer, was the original authoritative critique on the New International
Economic Order spearheaded by members of the Trilateral Commission. Wood
is also executive director of World Research Library, publisher of The
August Review.
-
- You can contact Patrick at <>editor@augustreview.com
-
- © Copyright 2008 by Patrick Wood
|
