Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com
Rumors Of My
Death May Be Justified
By Author H. Michael Sweeney
5-20-8
 
(a true personal adventure of a citizen vs. Terrorists and the Feds)
Edited version from the Appendix of Fatal Rebirth, Vol. II, Future
Reviled (proparanoidpress.com) originally from the Proparanoid Newsletter468
 
If so, I name my killers
 
Put into other words, this article could also be titled 'Is Memorial day to be another 9-11 in America?' It is why this newsletter issue is being written early. In this article you will learn: that the war on terror-ism is a sham, we have met the enemy and they is U.S.; that a specific terrorist threat has been reported, ignored, and covered up; that the FBI does not investigate terrorist tips because removing fear would reduce their control over us; that we citizens are left alone to face the evils of terrorism, evils wrought by our government; that the only way to combat terror is by speaking out loudly and repeatedly, and going to war ourselves.
 
On the weekend of March 29, 2003, a Middle Eastern man sat in his car surveilling a gas station, his eyes observing every detail of the attendant's interaction with customers. He scanned the area and noted the heavy traffic in front of the station, especially the long line of cars stuck waiting for the traffic light, two abreast. Statistically one of the busiest intersection in the State, the line of cars backs up for two blocks at peak traffic times. He noted the busses as they passed, several every hour, in all four directions. Three of the buses serve the Counties largest and busiest shopping centers, where there is also a college and huge hospital complex - all just a mile or so away, and as a result, these buses were typically full of shoppers, students, and medical- related passengers.
 
All of these things, he seemed to be taking note of, literally; he was indeed writing down frequent notes about something. If these facts interested him, there were more of equal worth: Across the street was a hotel and a Taco Bell, pizza parlor, and a strip mall. Next to the station was a bank, a restaurant, and a key cellular communications tower. The other side of the intersection from the station had a McDonalds, another bank, and a convenience store on one corner, and yet another gas station, hotel, and restaurant on the other, as well as a US Post Office. The intersection was a major arterial where two State highways joined with an Interstate Freeway, which itself ran behind the station; the station was atop a shallow hill, and down the hill just a short distance away was a shopping mall on one side and a major megaretail outlet on the other. The gas station itself had only a few years earlier set regional records for gallons pumped.
 
If this man was a terrorist, he could imagine any number of attack scenarios and their resulting destruction and carnage. At peak traffic times, the number of people within one block of the gas station was likely several thousand. An explosion, especially if large enough to rupture the main underground fuel tanks (roughly 50,000 gallons), would likely result in a river of fire flowing down the street towards the two shopping areas.
 
The blast and fireball itself, of course, would do tremendous harm to the cars in the street, any passing buses, and likely, the nearby buildings - at least one motel, and perhaps the bank and one of the restaurants. Damage to a bank would be a bonus to terrorists who have already demonstrated on 9-11 that they like to hit American financial underpinnings. And, with luck, they could bring down the cell phone tower, too. And all of it within a half- block of one of the area's busiest freeways, where tens of thousands of cars pass every hour, more in peak times.
 
Al Qaeda is known to have considered gas stations as its targets, with specific industry warnings to that effect having been announced publicly. This particular gas station belongs to an international oil giant which might be of special interest to any terrorist who happens to hate George Bush (pick one). It turns out that this particular oil company owes its original leadership and ownership history to both the Bush and Rockefeller families.
 
Clearly, Bush is on the terrorist's A list, and it does not take much thought to figure that Rockefeller is probably on the same page, if not near the top. Brand recognition is not just a marketing consideration, but also, a strategic matter for terrorists.
 
If that ownership trail were not enough, the brand is also partnered with British Petroleum, and with Aramco, the Saudi Royal Family's oil company. In essence, this brand of gas represents everything an al-Qaeda terrorist had been taught to hate. All these things were likely being considered carefully, and written down, while the man in the car sat, hours on end. Drinking bottled water and occasionally looking at undetermined reading materials, his eyes and his ink pen were quite busy. But he was being surveilled, too.
 
Yours truly was on the case. Not because of any great sleuthing or investigative effort, but by virtue of self defense and duty. You see, I was acting Manager for this particular gas station at the time. It was extremely unusual for anyone to sit for hours and observe us, and I took note. I also took action.
 
Usually, only thoughtful robbers, competitors, or perhaps corporate busy bodies evaluating performance would do these things. As such, it was not entirely a rare event, and thus, we were not overly concerned. Yet, even these 'justified' snoops would not take so many notes, nor would they spend as much time. Nor, would they normally be Middle Eastern. I had by now notified FBI by phone. They seemed interested and took all the particulars, including vehicle description and license plate number. I had by now actually obtained the fingerprints of the individual by retrieving an empty pack of cigarettes he had discarded. I literally scooped it up right under his nose while 'policing' the area of other refuse, a duty I would normally leave to staff.
 
By chance, the following Monday evening, I noted a vehicle matching the suspect's as it drove by the station after dark. I could not verify the plates or occupants (there were two) in the darkness or at that distance, but I was able to see where it went; to a health club just a block down the street.
 
The car then returned back towards the station with only the driver. It then turned into an adult store parking lot which was situated behind the motel across from the station. He was there for only about thirty minutes. When I got off work I went first to the adult store and the clerk there agreed that a customer matching the description of the suspect had been there in that time frame. I then went to the health club and was a bit shocked to find another Middle Eastern person.
 
My shock was from the fact that I recognized him as someone else seen at the station. That might not be unusual, except that this person was there only once, and had stood out in my mind at the time as acting strangely - and for having a somewhat unusual hairstyle, perhaps especially unusual for a Middle Eastern type. It was a kind of 1950's wavy style (a kind of West Side Story look) with lots of moose to make it shiny bright, despite its jet black nature.
 
And there was something about his eyes, and his attitude. Decidedly private, avoiding eye contact, and avoiding use of more than one or two word sentences:
 
"Fill."
 
"Regular fill?" I asked.
 
"Yes."
 
 
No 'please' or 'thank you.' No response to 'Hello, how are you, today?' A shaken (no) head when asked 'Would you like me to clean your windows?" He paid with a twenty which had been crisply folded into fourths and then drove off without waiting for his change. The folds would later become significant when I learned that a $20 could be folded to reveal both the Pentagon and the WTC towers in flames.
 
That same evening, by comparing our first terrorist suspect with FBI photos on the Internet, I discovered that indeed, one particular terrorist known to have been operating in our (Portland) area, looked very much like the man in the car. In fact, by using PhotoShop to modify the hair style to match that of our suspect, the similarity was quite pronounced. (Images for this article provided on the CD-R e-book versions.)
 
He was an al-Qaeda suspect considered dangerous and known to be operating in Portland area: Habis Abdulla al-Saoub - FBI image from <http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/saoub.htm> and my edited image: Altered contrast/background/color balance to make more lifelike, Slightly expanded to show heavier appearance, altered facial and head hair. This resulted in a strikingly similar match.
 
 
 
Habis Abdulla al-Saoub - FBI unedited image (left)
Note taker, porn user: Photoshop edited image (right)
 
So much of a match was it, that another employee was able to state he had seen the man watching the station the day before, which had been my day off. Naturally, this heightened my suspicions further, as corporate and competitor snoops never watch more than one day.
 
But even more remarkably, the second suspect from the health club looked even more like another terrorist <http://www.fbi.gov/ terrorinfo/ adnan.htm>, once the hair was modified in PhotoShop. This one was named Adnan G. El Shukri Jumah, a.k.a. Abu Arif; Ja'far al-Tayar; Jaffar al-Tayyar; Jafar Tayar; and Jaafar al-Tayyar.
 
 
 
Adnan G. El Shukri - FBI unedited image (left)
Health club user, gas buyer: PhotoShop edited image (right)
 
 
So now, I had two fairly strong visual matches to two individuals who fit the terrorist profile: Middle East persons who appear to be conducting surveillance of a gas station; who though Islamic (if terrorists) were quite fond of a mix of pornography and health clubs. I consider this telling: Recall that virtually all of the 9-11 terrorists were engaged in these same activities, though quite clearly, any Islamic fundamentalist about to Martyr himself for his religion would not be caught dead committing sins of the flesh as part of the preparation to die. No. That is a particularly Western thinking.
 
As stated, the FBI was contacted early in this matter, by telephone. The person on the phone seemed quite interested, but that was as far as it got. No one ever called back. No one visited to get the fingerprints. But that was before I knew the suspect fit the description of a known terrorist, and that there was another suspect who also fit the description of a suspected terrorist involved with the first suspect, or that both suspects fit the behavioral profile of 9-11 terrorists.
 
When I figured all that out, I decided escalation of the matter was in order, given FBI's silence. It was then that I used PhotoShop to modify the hair of the two FBI images and produced startling matches to the men we had seen. When a third member of my staff recognized the first suspect based on the resulting artwork, it seemed clear to me that I was on to something. That is when I called the FBI a second time, and then emailed them with the artwork and a complete list of events as thus described herein. But that was still as far as things went. No one called back. No one visited. Apparently, no one at FBI actually follows up on terrorist tips, no matter how good they might be (you be the judge if this seems a good tip, or not).
 
But of course, that fits in with everything NOILWAR! has been saying, as best expressed by the Timeline for Treason: government complicity in 9-11 abounds; the FBI, CIA, and military have not only failed to stop terrorists, they have aided and abetted them, trained and housed them, given them visas and money, and protected them from investigation - while at the same time persecuting anyone in the US or foreign intelligence communities who threatened to expose them.
 
One might think this was a slightly better than average lead as far as quality goes: three people agreeing that the suspects matched known terrorists; the suspects were doing things suspiciously like terrorist planning; the suspects were associated and both were engaged in activities found in common with other terrorists. I had obtained finger prints; I was able to offer a fourth eye witness and video tape resource at the adult store; I was able to offer multiple witnesses at the health club; I was able to offer access through the health club and book store to possible signatures, charge card information, and address and phone number of at least one and possibly both suspects. But FBI was not interested. No one called. No one visited. One wonders what kind of lead they would follow?
 
Later that weeks, things escalated once more, initiated by the other side, this time. Someone in a small civilian airplane (later identified as a Cessna 172 RG) was doing a little flying in the area. Their flying skills were quite questionable: their course corrections were frequent and erratic, a series of overcorrections; their air speed was very near stall speed; their altitude was about 150 feet - well below minimum allowed FAA altitudes for airplanes over a crowded city. In fact, they were well below the height of six nearby radio towers and several hilltops. They were approximately as high as the cell phone tower, to which they came within 200 feet of as they neared our station.
 
 
 
PhotoShop edited image (top) to match aircraft
Original Cessna 172RG image (bottom)
 
 
These things alone got them noticed, but what really got my attention was their flight course, which was a series of circles in an somewhat tear drop pattern, the long side of which was essentially aimed at my station. Now, the only corrective course adjustments were while coming towards the station, not while going away - suggesting that they were trying (unsuccessfully) to line up on the station. Four tries, and they finally got it right. They were headed directly for us. At about 500 foot distance, the tail went up, both flaps went down, and so did the nose.
 
But just as quickly, the plane leveled out after loosing less than twenty feet or so. Had the plane continued to dive, it would not have struck the gas station, but would instead have clipped a power pole, as the effort was too early by about five seconds if trying to target the station. The course still was not right: though the flight path was true and finally dead on target, the angle of flight would not well avoid power and light poles, or our massive sign uprights which were a good 40 foot high.
 
As it reached the station on this final pass, the plane pulled away and flew off in the distance. Its actions had been so questionable that even customers were asking what the hell was up, and were anxious to leave the property - with no comments on my part regarding the history or significance of prior events. Their's was a spontaneous reaction to this plane.
 
If all of this was not unnerving enough, the plane was so close as to be able to see with absolute clarity that it had absolutely no tail number or identification of any kind. Indeed, it appeared these had been deliberately whited out (arted image). This is a violation of FAA regulations, too.
 
I immediately called the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) and reported these observations, and referenced the FBI report earlier made and the Middle East man engaged in surveillance. The FAA authority expressed concern especially at the altitude and the lack of markings. We agreed that if the pilot could be tracked down and he turned out to be Middle Eastern, that FBI would be notified. He also promised to call me back with any findings either way.
 
He had not called back when, some ten or twenty minutes later, the plane appeared to return. This time, it was at a higher altitude (perhaps trying to figure out how to overfly the poles with a steeper attack angle.) That altitude made a positive ID difficult, but the aircraft shape was the same, and the color was the same. Again, multiple teardrop circles with a general aiming towards the station - each time turning away after reaching a point representing a logical dive position. He flew off once more, due North, and then returned again some fifteen minutes later at an even higher altitude. After more circles, he left and returned yet one more time, this time a little lower, at about the same altitude as the prior run.
 
These repeated returns after a fifteen minute delay suggested someone was repeatedly flying a course, as if trying to become familiar with it. A novice pilot might need such visual 'training' in order to prepare for a single-minded mission. All these thoughts all the plane's activities, as individual elements and as a sum total, were troubling. I called FAA once more, but was unable to get through. I called later from my home once more to identify the aircraft model type (172RG) from images on the Web. I was only able to leave a message. No one called back. No one visited.
I might have been less concerned, except that within an hour or so of these flights, one of my employees reported getting an odd phone call.
 
Someone with an accent (not Hispanic, not oriental, not European) called and asked some curious things:
 
"Do you sell diesel fuel?"
 
The answer was "No, I'm sorry, we do not have diesel."
 
The next question was "What are your hours? When do you close?"
 
Well, excuse me, but I'm wondering why someone who can't buy what they want would want to know when they couldn't get it?
 
 
It was almost as if someone had figured out that they were not a good enough pilot to use a small plane, and that they were going to have to drive a truck into the station. Well, apparently their first choice was a diesel truck. Now, they will just have to rent a gas powered truck. Ryder's are all the rage with terrorist,s anyway, you know. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that the other leading rental truck outfit is a corporation held by prominent members of the military industrial complex, and Ryder isn't. It is just that yellow is a favorite terrorist color. Oops, both of the brands use yellow! I guess we need a new theory to explain the preference - unless you like the conspiracy theory already implied.
 
Now in the absence of anyone calling back, other events instead transpired. For one, the next weekend, the airplane seemed to have returned for a second day of menacing our station. This time, however, whomever flew it was a confident and skilled pilot. The plane came at the station from a different direction and much faster; at cruise speed, again at about 150 feet high. But just before reaching the station, it pulled a high-G U-turn smoothly and sharply. It returned about five minutes later and repeated the maneuver with precision (identical positioning and course. turn point, and arc radius).
 
The only reason I say 'seemed to have returned' is that at the speed flown, we had no advance warning of its approach until we heard the buzz of its engines as it entered the turn. Looking up, we saw only the plane's bottom. Same color, same make and model, but we were unable to see the sides to see if there were numbers or different markings. To me, it seemed that whomever owned the plane was annoyed that the FAA had investigated and was 'punishing' us and trying to get us to make another report. Why that might be would become clear, later. Either that, or they were showing the 'trainee' how to do it better.
 
A few days hence, my employees noted another event, another kind of escalation, perhaps. A series of repeat occurrences, actually. Osama bin Laden had apparently moved into the hotel across the street from the station! He would open his drapes and stand fully visible in the large window. His long unkempt gray beard, a white or orange turban, and gray and white robes were all the spitting image of bin Laden. Of course it was not bin Laden, just someone who looked remarkably like him, though perhaps a bit younger. Clearly, he was some sort of Islamic cleric. What worried my crew was that whenever we looked up at him, he seemed to step back into the darkness of the room away from the window. It was as if he was watching us, and did not wish to be seen doing so.
 
He was there for several weeks, actually. Every day, he could be seen taking a walk away from the hotel towards the shopping areas, but he was never seen returning. He simply reappeared in the window in mid or late day. The notion that he might have been a decision maker there to approve any attack plan did not escape our minds. Then, on the weekend of March 10, a third aircraft menacing event transpired. I mention this in the same paragraph as the summary of our bin Laden look alike only because that after this event, we never saw bin Laden, again.
 
This plane was entirely different. It appeared to be a small single engine Beechcraft A36 or B36 similar to the included image. The color scheme was white with two-tone gold-brown accents using a different scheme than the one shown. Because it, too, flew quite fast and low, the details of the paint scheme remain unclear in my mind and I've not attempted to reproduce it, here. What was unusual about this event was the bizarre course the plane took, all at high speed.
 
 
 
Beechcraft A36/B36 Series (unedited)
 
 
I first noticed the plane because of an identical high speed bank maneuver as described above, though it came from a different direction than the earlier passes and thus, turned over a different area (over the hotel.) It may interest the reader to note that all turns made by all three aircraft in each and every maneuver were to the pilot's left, except for one turn which will be described, shortly. I watched the plane fly back briefly the way it had come, then bank left to fly around a hill which was higher than its altitude. It then climbed slowly as it flew beyond a second hill, and banked left once more. It leveled out flying across the horizon due West.
 
I predicted that if it was our friend, it would bank at a given point. It did turn, but instead of a slow banking circle, it did a sharp U-turn and doubled directly back to the East. My sigh of relief was short lived, because after all but departing mind's concern, it made a second tight turn to head due south, directly at us once more - effectively the turn I had predicted, just late and more dramatic. That maneuver had put it on a course almost directly aligned with us and the high radio towers. It was only slightly east of the towers by a few hundred feet and perhaps 300 feet above them (about twice their height). As it approached, it slowly descended back to the low 150 foot range, having passed the radio towers at their height. It overflew (buzzed) the station at high speed (there was a tail number but it was unreadable at the angle) and then slowly ascended to about 1,500 feet (proper altitude.)
 
It then banked into a very slow turn back towards its point of origin. By its arrival and departure courses, I deduced it had likely come from the Troutdale Airport. A visit to that airport revealed a number of aircraft there which were quite similar, but no positive ID could be made, as the aircraft were locked away behind a fence at a distance. All of these mysterious events had taken place to create an atmosphere of alarm. But thus far, we had had no response from FBI or FAA. Then, all of a sudden, something even more strange and unexpected happened. The entire intelligence community responded, as if a flood. But it was how they responded which raised even more interesting questions.
 
They did not contact me or my crew, all witnesses in the matter. They did not contact anyone at the adult store or the health club. They did not show pictures sent them to anyone. In fact, the actions apparently did not stem from my FBI outreach, at all. Rather, it appears that my reports on these concerns to my corporate security department had caused them to contact the FBI in Houston, where the corporate offices are located.
 
Now it appears that FBI there may not have done the logical thing, which was to contact the Portland office. Instead, it appears they contacted my regional supervisor and asked for details. They asked many questions which had already been answered in my reports to FBI, such as 'What was the tail number?' It just did not make sense.
 
In fact, not only the FBI, but the CIA, and the FAA contacted my boss. Excuse me, but this makes even less sense. FBI would not bring in CIA without good cause. CIA has no authority in the matter, but only provides (on a good day) intelligence to FBI, and seeks the same in return (on an unusually good day). In the absence of an FBI investigation and positive findings, the tip offered by me represented mere conjecture yet to be proven useful.
 
Involving CIA before establishing it useful made no sense. Further, by the questions FBI, CIA, and FAA asked, it is clear they did not have access to my report to FBI or FAA. Why did they not check with their own local offices? Why did they ask my supervisor, and not me and my fellow eye witnesses? The first rule of investigative process is go to the source - don't rely on second hand information, and for the same reason that hearsay is not admissible in court.
 
But there was a more serious oddity. Apparently, after asking their questions, they informed my superior that they already had all the answers as to what really took place. They said that all helicopters had been grounded that day, and local TV stations had been forced to rent airplanes to cover traffic issues. They said there had been two traffic accidents blocking freeway traffic in our area and the aircraft in question had been flying low to cover that event. It was mere coincidence and innocent circumstance. That is what they said. However, there are some problems with this story. It is a pure fabrication. I ask why they would do that? And, I illustrate, reminding the reader that FBI/CIA and FAA had only known about the first two flights, not any of the others, which had not been reported as the earlier reports were clearly being ignored:
 
One problem is, that the accidents in question had been earlier in the day by several hours. It is possible the traffic was still backed up and 'newsworthy' when the airplane was in the area, but we were no longer getting that kind of 'news' from customers buying gas. We generally are the first to know when there is a nearby problem on the freeway. If not by customer comment, then by first responders with sirens screaming past the station to get onto the freeway. So the timing of the known accidents did not seem to mesh with FBI's claim.
 
Further, when a plane is used, the cameraman must use the copilot's seat and shoot out the window on that side. The plane would ideally circle the subject matter (event) of interest banking slightly towards it, circling about it in as smooth a loop as possible for longer video recording opportunities. Or, it would fly parallel to the action along a freeway, to show the long line of cars. The plane in question did not circle the freeway where the accidents were known to have happened and did not bank towards the copilot's side for camera work. They instead circled over other areas and banked to the pilot's side. Any cameraman would have been limited to shooting only while the plane was flying straight and level; the long line of the teardrop pattern. However, this was not parallel to the freeway, nor was it near the accidents. Something was not right with this story.
 
My employees and I had much earlier decided on our own that perhaps just such an accident might reasonably have accounted for the plane's presence and behavior, despite details which made it seem unlikely. I believe I even stated as much when I called the FAA. But knowing this, we all took care to watch the news carefully that evening. We each watched as many stations as we could. No one saw any such news coverage, not even a mention. Attempts to verify the 'news' story by checking with local stations produced interesting results, as we shall shortly see.
 
Likely, it was the same cover story fed the FAA by someone on behalf of FBI or CIA, and likely, FAA had contacted the plane's owners, who in response, knowing the cover story had already been decided upon, attempted to 'fake us out' and get us to call in yet another report the next weekend. Perhaps they were trying to get me to live up to my namesake as 'Professional Paranoid', in order to discredit me with FAA and my employers. Though I did not take that bait, to a degree, my employers were already skeptical, led into thinking by the cover story that I had overreacted to 'normal' events. The discrediting tactic would create a 'cry wolf' effect; a plausible excuse for FBI's willfully ignoring our complaints. Thus in the end, if something bad actually happened, we, the victims, would be blamed, not the FBI. But there are a few facts yet to be told.
 
The cover story was that all helicopters were grounded, and that for that reason, TV news coverage of the traffic accidents required use of fixed wing aircraft. I've already explained why that seems a fishy story. Now, here is the proof I am right:
 
I contacted ALL TV stations in the area. Each of them said essentially the same thing, some using the same phrases I write here: 'If all helicopters were grounded, we would be among the first to know and that in itself would have been news, and we would have followed up on it." "If our helicopters were grounded, we simply wouldn't fly. We never use fixed wing aircraft, because they are not suited to our needs."
 
In essence, no TV coverage of the traffic accidents had been undertaken, at all. Only a few radio stations have traffic coverage, and they rely on caller advisories and other resources, leaving the expense of flying to the TV stations. They covered no accidents that day because they chose not to, and not one of their helicopters were not grounded. The FBI, CIA, and FBI lied, leaving
us with a few key questions unanswered. What are they covering up? Who are they protecting? Why hang us out to dry? Who benefits?
 
And one last thing, as I put the finishing touches on this saga of mysteries yet another Islamic visitor to the station. This one seemed rather Egyptian, based on stereotypes. He walked onto the property and entered the store, and purchased a soda pop. I helped him, and tried to be friendly and asked the usual sales questions. No answers other than negative nods. He wouldn't look me in the eye but for the briefest of glances.
All this aroused my interest, but not as much as when he pulled out a fist of unkempt wadded bills, easily over $1,000. This did not match his transportation or clothing style. He was dressed just one notch above a homeless person: very worn clothes and outer jacket which were otherwise quite clean. His shoes, however, were brand new; the kind of boots a soldier would wear.
 
So I elected to watch him as he left the property, walking towards the superstore past the bank. He carried the bottle at his side, only opening it and taking a single sip after traveling two-thirds the distance. I don't know about anyone else, but I usually buy a soft drink because I'm thirsty, or because I intend to drink it. He entered the superstore and remained for about ten minutes. When he returned and walked past our store some fifteen minutes later, he had nothing in his hands but the still-full soda bottle. There was no bulge in his coat pocket, so if he bought anything, it was a simple, small item which could fit in his pocket unobserved. So his visit to that store was itself somewhat a minor mystery, except that it offers a good view of the station.
 
He walked onward, and I observed. As when he had left our station for the superstore, he never glanced back once - which was perhaps the only thing he did which made him less suspicious in my mind. I watched him walk four blocks until out of site. Assuming, since his arrival was from the same direction, that he was returning to his point of origin, he passed two location where he could have purchased his soda or even any unseen item from the superstore.
 
So, why did he choose my store for the soda, where it would be more expensive? Why didn't he drink from it? Why walk so far to pay more? Beyond the point where he was just vanishing out of sight was a very small cluster of homes and apartments, followed by a large industrial and commercial area and massive freeway interchange. On the other side of that was even more commercial and industrial property before once again encountering residential area.
 
That he would go beyond the nearby homes made little sense, unless he was on a break from his workplace. But given the time of day, it would have to have been a break, not a lunch, and he had already spent some thirty minutes - too long to be a break. Given this was a Sunday, there were very few firms in the area which were even open or operating, even with modest work crews.
 
But there was also one specific firm within the industrial complex which had already earned a particular interest from me, especially if this was where he was headed. Such a place might have sent him on this particular trip with no concern over the time required. It was a suspected CIA proprietary, one working in bioimplant devices of the type written of in my book, MC Realities; a "neuroscience device which allows communications directly to the brain," apparently using voice to skull technology (that is how the proprietary describes it).
 
To the intelligence community and among mind control researchers and victims, such devices are more popularly called 'the Voice of God which cannot be disobeyed.' It is the perfect control tool for religious zealots, allowing such an implant to convince the victim to become a martyr and strap on a bomb 'in the service of God.' Such implants can be installed without the victim's knowledge, and it has long been my belief that this is the source of suicide bombers, not political despera-tion mixed with twisted ideological or religious fervor. Well, perhaps a bit of the later, artificially induced via the implant.
 
Evidence for this being the case is found in my book, where I reference an eyewitness account illustrating that early experimentation in the technology specifically required military researchers to select unwitting Islamic students for their tests. Why Islamics, we might ask? Why, indeed. Ask next who benefits from terrorism?
 
It is never the terrorist or their cause, for the backlash of horrific acts of murderous terrorism against innocents to include women and children serves to strengthen the resolve of those whom they attack. Such attacks drive renewed nationalism and allow the governments involved to become more powerful, more police-state like, without protest. And no one is the wiser, if such attacks are by covert design by that government, who in turn quickly blames some outside terrorist group. To me, all of 9-11 smells of this same order: an American Reichestag Fire. Only I call it Northwoods.
 
I decided I just had to know where this wealthy 'beggar' type was going. I got into my car and followed his path until I spotted him some two blocks ahead, and I pulled over and watched him continue on for another few blocks. I then pulled forward again, and watched once more. And again. So for nearly nine more blocks he walked, almost to the edge of the freeway.
 
At no time did he look back. At no time did he take a drink from his soda, still listless at his side, and by now, only slightly cool in the warm day. It was as if it was a prop he had been ordered to purchase, and having obeyed this one, simple instruction, he had no thought of his own as to what to actually do with it. Perhaps at one point he had actually been instructed to 'take a drink' as he left and he blindly followed that instruction to the letter: a single solitary sip.
 
I was in the street and approaching the point where I next wished to pull over. It was the closest I had come to him in these advances of my position, a matter forced by absence of driveways or opportunities to pull over. Now, as it happens, my car is a bit loud due to a leak in the exhaust gasket. Not as loud as a motorcycle or a truck, or even a muscle car, but louder than it is supposed to be for a family car - I was now close enough that he might hear. Apparently, he did, and he stopped, then turned to look.
 
I was not unprepared. My turn signal was on and so, I should not have looked too suspicious - but what was suspicious was that he turned at the sound. That, and what he did next together implied that he recognized my car by its sound - a matter which has serious implications with respect to the subject of this article. In like manner, it implied he was worried about being followed, and took actions to conceal his destination. He changed directions and walked across the street and sat down at the bus stop. I pulled out of sight and waited for five minutes.
 
When I pulled back to a viewpoint, I caught him standing and starting to walk accross the street again - but he then faltered, turned and looked at me once more, and then began standing as if impatiently waiting for the bus. I did not buy that - since he had already walked past four bus stops for that line, and had been walking on the wrong side of the street. This man was clearly not waiting for a bus. He was waiting for me to think he was, and to leave.
 
I had little choice but to do so. He was now only one block away from the mind control front. I drove next there but found no evidence of anyone's presence, though there is a parking area out of view and access for all but employees. I was forced to abandon the effort with more questions raised, than answered. At the very least, it seemed clear to me that the man's visit to my store had little to do with thirst. His bottle of pop was still virtually untouched, hanging at his side. 1045
 
Finally, yesterday, the very day that news stories are awash with stories on the elevation of the terrorism alert to Orange and how we citizens need to be alert for anything suspicious - to specifically include reporting anyone who seems to be conducting surveillance (been there, done that) this happened:
 
A plane very much like the first repeatedly overflew our station at 2,500 feet. It appeared to be the same plane, flying over from various directions at about twenty minute intervals. This is not normal. We might normally see one plane fly over any of these given paths in a given day. This one repeatedly flew the same courses. And, it was during the same time frame as each of the other 'harassment' flights. The thing that bothers me most about these over flights, however, is that they were once more at the stall speed of the aircraft, the perfect speed from which to commence a high, steep dive.
 
So if it turns out that I am dead anytime soon as a result of a terrorist event, I have likely been murdered by an explosion at my gas station. My murderers are known terrorists, as named herein. But my murderers are conspiratorial. Among the members of the conspiracy to murder are also Charles Mathews III and Laurie J. Bennett (we know each other by sight, but she does not know that until reading this - which I'm sure she has), the Special Agents in charge of the FBI office here in Portland, and those agents under them who refused to override orders not to investigate my tips. There are other Federal agents involved that I cannot name, but their names are clearly recorded with my employer.
 
1045 My personal 'Fuse' (Deepthroat) has since advised that the
man in question was likely an assassin scouting my work place for pre planning my murder, probably disguised as a robbery. He said that by causing unwanted FBI/FAA interest, an interest likely reported by CIA partners to the terrorists, they felt I needed to be silenced if any attacks were to be successfully carried out. They would be afraid I would go public, given my background. Indeed, he says, I literally beat them to the punch by doing just that ­ publishing this article, both establishing a roadblock to the terrorism (government would have no excuse they had not been warned), and eliminating both the need for my murder (too-late syndrome) and making any such murder dangerous, as local investigation might lead to a terrorism tie in. Perhaps the pen is mightier than the sword?
 
 
Of course, anyone who has read the NOILWAR! pages knows how kindly I speak of FBI and how kind they (Laurie, et al) have been to me and other civilian investigators of Flight 800. One might even deduce they would have a motive for my murder (self defense, of sorts, given that the pen IS mightier than their magnifying glasses, tape recorders, and guns perverted to serve political agenda, rather than the truth and justice.) And, as a bonus, they save $5M in reward money if they ignore my tip.
 
And since FBI works with the Department of Justice, then my murderers also include Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director John Mueller, and those under these men who have ordered the various Field offices not to investigate terrorism.
 
And since both of these organizations are creations of and report to the Office of the President, then my murderers include George Walker Bush, and Vice President Cheney. I'm going out on a bit of a limb, here, but this crowd looks rather a lot like a conspiracy at work, to me. Complicit in the Crime are the entire Bush White House Staff, a collective of persons with a long list of ties to Daddy Bush, the oil industry, the military industrial complex, and the biomedical industry - all of whom profit by terrorism and the convenient wars they have spawned under the sales pitch which was 9-11.
 
Never mind that the 9-11 pilots trained at military and CIA facili- ties, just accept what government tells you: that Osama bin Laden, alone, was responsible for orchestrating 9-11.
 
Never mind that Osama met cordially with the CIA Station Chief in the American Hospital of Dubai just a few weeks prior to 9-11 (at a time when he was 'wanted dead or alive' by the Clinton and Bush administrations), just believe what media tells you: that the war of terrorism is patriotic and moral, and we will (just like Clinton and Bush I, promised to do, but failed) get bin Laden.
 
Never mind that media has resisted telling the full truth about the pre planned nature of these wars, and their ties to oil as found in elsewhere in the world press, which is why France and other nations do not want to ally themselves with Bush, just believe what Fox tells you: their coverage is fair and balanced.
 
Never mind that two of the top Osama bin Laden 'Generals' were actually CIA/Military double agents working for us, and that it was they who formed and financed bin Laden's al-Qaeda, planned an helped execute terrorist acts against the United States, and repeatedly failed to take ANY actions which would have in ANY way diminished bin Laden's ability to conduct terrorism, just believe what George Bush tells you: the wars in the Middle East are NOT about oil, they are about terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.
 
Never mind that these war plans espoused by Bush cronies from Daddy's White House (and earlier) were spawned by NWO types long connected to the Bush dynasty - a dynasty going all the way back to fascist/Nazi interests in WWII (and earlier), just believe what the escalating pollsters report: that 127% of all Americans support the President and his (insert current war, here.)
 
Never mind about Operation Northwoods just happening to match, proposed terrorist event to actual event, event after event, the sum total of terrorism we have been subjected to since the creation of Osama - or that the Pentagon was planning for a civilian air crash months in advance of the event, just believe what your newspaper told you: 9-11 was unexpected terrorism and no one had imagined such attacks were even possible.
Never mind that the purpose of terrorism is to allow a party to gain power of control over a government and its people - which is exactly what the draconian response by the Federal government has achieved since 9-11, and believe instead that the loss of rights and freedoms experienced by even just one citizen in the name of 'preventing terrorism' is a good thing, that the ends justify the means.
 
Never mind that the real benefactor of 9-11 was the military industrial complex (especially the arms, biomed, and oil industries), the emerging police state, and Fascist New World Order power players, just believe the talk about Jihad - a holy war between Christians and Jews against the Muslims.
 
Never mind that the God of Islam and the God of the Jews and the God of the Christians is the same, the one and only God of Abraham, just believe that smart bombs and TLAMS kill only the bad guy.
 
Welcome to the NWO. You are invited to my funeral to celebrate its arrival. Or is it your nation's funeral? Only you can decide and force the appropriate response by your actions. Perhaps becoming a NOILWARRIOR! is a good place to start?
 
Note: More recently (mid November, 2003), a certain helicopter with a nose mounted FLEER/camera system flew perfect circles around the station at about 300 feet altitude and at a distance of about 1,000 feet. with the camera pointed at the station the whole time. I have identified this helicopter but withhold its identity for strategic reasons. A third time, the helicopter flew less precisely about the station at a much lower altitude. In this event, the pilot flew sideways with the nose pointed at the station for a distance. One of my employees gave the 'finger' and the pilot pivoted directly towards him and came forward to hover 'at him' - leaving only when the employee was forced to help a customer and break the 'stare down.' There were multiple passengers visible.
 
Within a few days, yet another plane menaced the station in the most spectacular maneuvers to date. They were all very high speed banks with a kind of 'combat' maneuver involving actual dives directly at the station. They were all exactly the same, four in a row, each involving a straight dive out of the bank towards the station breaking off just as the plane approached what might be called a 'point of no return.' Many customers exited their vehicles and prepared to run at the sight. I say these were Fed pilots illustrating how it 'could be done' based on the helo video analysis.
 
This plane started its maneuvers at about 200 feet, rose to about 300 feet, and ended them at a height less than twenty feet above the inter-section's power poles. Again, no markings of any kind on the plane, which came to within 100 feet of the station at the low altitudes, affording an excellent look. Rivets could be made out where 'filled in' with grime. Since then, I have taken new employment, but those who remain working there still watch the skies and keep me posted. I pray for them, and others like them, praying that I am wrong about what this all means. Meanwhile, a half dozen pilots are watching to locate these planes and identify owners.
 
Of course, we know that Bush has since come forward and assured us all that Homeland Security and the FBI were hard at work and he told us the ten things they had done to combat terrorism effectively under his mandate, to include 'Gas Station Tasking'. No more was said about it, not even to explain what it meant. Now you know what he was talking about: he was talking about taking credit for preventing terrorism that I was combating. He was talking about taking credit for something I did. He was talking about withholding the $5M reward for citizen reports that prevent terrorism or result in terrorists being captured. Thanks a lot, Mr. President!
 
H. Michael Sweeney,
author and consultant on privacy and security issues
Publisher, ProParanoidPress
a man vainly hoping for his $5M reward
proparanoidpress.com
 
 
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Email
Article
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros