- The 232nd 4th of July celebrations are soon to be over
for another year. We might even smirk at our good fortune, but are we
really free of them? The research that I have done over the last 15 years
continues to show that we have been brought back under British rule. While
I thought the reunion began in 1944 with creation of the IMF/World Bank
and 1945 with the United Nations, I recently found the charade goes back
to 1794. While it appears that we are independent, we are not. My first
inkling that something was amiss began when I discovered Prince Charles
supported the population reducing environmental philosophy of sustainable
development. I found he was a major player behind the scenes to get this
diabolical agenda to "go down" at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit.
He also organized a major meeting in Charleston two years earlier in 1990
to bring together CEO's from the world's most powerful companies to help
lobby for Agenda 21 in Rio and then for them to help change the structure
of government through public-private partnerships.
-
- As I researched the United Nations and started working
on my first book, Prince Charles the Sustainable Prince, I realized that
the British were the power behind that organization. I have yet to change
my mind. If anything, the evidence starts to compound. In 2004, while
covering the World Trade Organization meeting in Cancun Mexico, I interviewed
three officials from different British Commonwealth countries. In separate
interviews I asked them the same questions and received the same responses:
They are poor and starving and even though they are members of the Commonwealth,
there is no help from Britain. When asked why they don't withdraw from
the Commonwealth, each of them looked at me with great fear and said, "We
can't." To which I replied, "Then you are not free."
I went home upset because something was wrong.
-
- As I started to research the Commonwealth, I found the
Treaty of Westminster signed in 1931 put in place the Commonwealth structure
as a way for the monarch to create the illusion that her colonies had independence
when in fact it was a plan devised in the 1920s by the Royal Institute
for International Affairs, now called Chatham House. The 1926 Balfour Declaration
established Britain and its dominions were "equal in status, in no
way subordinate to one another in any aspect of their domestic or external
affairs, though united by common allegiance to the Crown and freely associated
as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations." While colonies
were given legislative independence, it automatically set the basis for
continuing the relationship through the Commonwealth in which they share
allegiance to the monarch! Therefore, the Queen is not only Queen of Canada,
but Queen of 12 other colonies in our hemisphere which include: The Bahamas,
Barbados, Belize, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago. Today at the international
level, the U.S. is outvoted by the Commonwealth at all global institutions:
the United Nations, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization, the
G8, the G7, the Free Trade Areas of the Americas, etc. To our one vote,
the Commonwealth has the potential of 54 votes.
-
- If that were not enough, I have long suspected that when
all the countries of the world signed on and became part of the international
infrastructure: the United Nations, the World Bank, etc. that they were
also signing on to some form of allegiance to the Crown. Providing me
with a major link is a book I recently came across a book, Dispute Settlement
in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by Natalie Klein,
published in 2005 by Cambridge University Press. To my shock, Ms. Klein
writes,
-
- "The Jay Treaty was a precedent for the settlement
of the Alabama claims."
-
- I recently became acquainted with the never discussed
and somehow forgotten Jay Treaty which every red-blooded American should
know about. During the Civil War, ships owned by the state of Alabama were
damaged by a British frigate. A Commission of Inquiry was set up so England
could settle the damage dispute with Alabama. Interestingly enough, the
procedure for the formation for International Commission of Inquiry go
back to the Jay Treaty of 1794. It appears that all U.S. foreign policy
comes out of the Jay Treaty and that all UN legal policy goes back to it.
From HYPERLINK "<http://www.yale.edu>http://www.yale.edu"
www.yale.edu, we find,
-
- The Jay Treaty. Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and navigation,
signed at London November 19, 1794, with additional article Original in
English. Submitted to the Senate June 8, Resolution of advice and consent,
on condition, June 24, 1795. Ratified by the United States August 14,
1795. Ratified by Great Britain October 28, 1795. Ratifications exchanged
at London October 28, 1795. Proclaimed [only kings proclaim]
February 29, 1796.
-
- Treaty of Amity Commerce and Navigation, between His
Britannick Majesty; and the United States of America, by Their President,
with the advice and consent of Their Senate. (Emphasis added)
-
- Furthermore, the Jay Treaty incorporates the concept
of the Commission of Inquiry which evolved out of the negotiating framework
that established the 1794 Jay Treaty negotiations. According to historian
Pitman B. Potter who wrote An Introduction to the Study of International
Organizations, published in 1922,
-
- The commission of inquiry originated in the 'mixed commission,'
which had bee extensively used since 1794, when the institution was adopted
by Great Britain and the United States for conducting certain arbitrations
provided in the Jay Treaty.
-
- He further states on page 206, that a Commission of Inquiry
is "[A] body of persons acting as a unified international governmental
institution." What?? That then means anytime we discuss or
have a meeting on the international level that a Commission of Inquiry
is being set up. He goes on to explain,
-
- "A great improvement has since been made by the
United States in this regard in concluding some thirty-five treaties with
different nations providing for commissions of inquiry to be appointed
in advance of the occurrence of any dispute between parties." (Potter,
p.209)
-
- Potter goes on to explain that the 1794 Jay Treaty established
the world's first recognized international government,
-
- "The year 1794 is frequently taken as a date from
which the history of modern international arbitration is to be traced.
In a sense this is accurate, for the Jay Treaty of that year, between
Great Britain and the United States, made provision for three arbitrations
and thus inaugurated that Anglo-American practice of arbitration which
has been the leading factor in promoting the development of arbitration
since that time." (Page 225)
-
- According to Potter, as a result of the Hague Peace Conference
of 1899, the Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes
was signed in July 1899 at The Hague. From 1899 to 1921, "arbitration
assumed the proportions of an international fad with the United States
and Great Britain still leading the movement but with all of the world
joining in vogue (page 226)." This is the legal basis for the Commission
of Inquiry which President Wilson convened to settle World War I.
-
- Interestingly enough the Versailles Peace Treaty which
established the League of Nations which came out of the Commission of Inquiry.
Furthermore, the Council on Foreign Relations-CFR came out of the Commission
of Inquiry, "The vision that stirred the Inquiry became the work of
the Council on Foreign Relations over a better part of the century"
( HYPERLINK "<http://www.crf.org/about/history/cfr/inquiry/html>http://www.crf.org/about/history/cfr/inquiry/html"
www.crf.org/about/history/cfr/inquiry/html). It should be noted that the
CFR has the same objective as Chatham House-bringing the world under British
rule. What Ms. Klein was explaining in her book is that the Commission
of Inquiry is part of the Law of the Sea Treaty! Is it as possible as
it looks that the entire global infrastructure comes from the Commission
of Inquiry process and the Jay Treaty of 1796? In other words, we never
broke with Britain as they created other ways to keep us in the fold. Using
multiple techniques, the British created the international level of government
they control. Tea anyone?
-
-
- The Women's International Media Group, Inc.
- www.womensgroup.org
-
-
|