- Freedom-loving people believe they are entitled to publicly
identify and oppose those who would enslave them. Tyrants want to convince
them otherwise: that, as victims of forces beyond their power to resist,
it's foolish and self-destructive to resist their oppressors.
-
- Early in his career, Sir Winston Churchill set an example
of a free man who used his power of the pen to identify and argue against
those he viewed as the greatest threat to Christian civilization.
-
- In the Illustrated Sunday Herald, Feb. 8, 1920, <http://www.fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/WSC/WSCwrote1920.html>he
wrote:
-
- The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly
in the breast of man nowhere reaches such an intensity as in the Jewish
race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly
exemplifiedAnd it may well be that this same astounding race may at the
present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals
and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if
not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered
possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel
of anti-Christ were destined to originate among the same people; and that
this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestation
both of the divine and diabolical.
-
-
- Churchill describes revolutionary Jews as masterminds
through history of a "world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization
and for the reconstitution of society" He describes the conspiracy
as "steadily growing" and says activist Jews have:
-
- been the mainspring of every subversive movement during
the Nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities
from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America has gripped
the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically
the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
-
- There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the
creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian
revolution, by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews
-
- Wages of Silence
-
- Today, no prominent leaders of church and state speak
out like Churchill. Jewish supremacism reigns over "Christian America."
Fearful leaders are paralyzed to declare the obvious: Liberal Jews today
even more boldly lead subversive and corruptive movements of our time.
-
- Jewish media does not really fear the howls of evangelical
protest that periodically erupt after their latest movie or sitcom attacks
Christian values -- the Jews behind these outrages are never identified.
Jewish media may, in fact, be pleased that Christians let off steam and
think they are effectively protesting. But the past century shows that
unspecific protest does not effectively halt the corruptions of "Babylon
the Great," the Jewish media juggernaut.
-
- This week, Christian/conservative media decried a new
movie, "Hounddog," which promotes pedophilia. <http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75615>WorldNetDaily.com
quotes Donna Miller, of Concerned Women for America: "Its visual representation
of a child engaging in sexually suggestive behaviors and being sexually
assaulted opens the door for child pornography to be mainstreamed into
the entertainment industry."
-
- But does Miller respond like Churchill? Does she identify
"Hounddog's" veteran pedophilia-promoting moviemaker and producer
<http://www.polishforums.com/polish_jews_they_changed_their-34_6470_15.html>Deborah
Kampmeier as Jewish? No. Of course, just being Jewish doesn't indict Kampmeier.
However, the last century's overwhelming pattern is that Jewish filmmakers
and media executives are the most likely members of society to push values
that are Christian-unfriendly and morally destructive. 1
-
- Miller's suggestion to her millions of WND readers is
to protest to another Jew, US Attorney General Michael Mukasy. This is
a waste of time because, like all Orthodox Jews, he follows the Talmud
as his highest ethical and religious authority. It teaches the very pedophilia
that Christian America is protesting! My article at <http://www.truthtellers.or>www.truthtellers.org,
"<http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html>Pedophilia:
The Talmud's Dirty Secret," documents that the most authoritative
Talmudic rabbis endorsed sex with little girls-not just at the age of nine
as in "Hounddog" but beginning at age three!
-
- Orthodox Jews deny that today they accept Talmudic permission
for pedophilia. I am sure that is true for most. But there is no escaping
the influence on modern Judaism from such moral rottenness in Judaism's
deepest foundations.
-
- Wearing Out the Saints
-
- The strategy of the Jewish media since the beginning
of the 20th century is to shock the "goyim" toward moral decay
faster than they seem ready, relentlessly moving toward even greater shocks.
Christians must devote full attention to the latest media-induced moral
emergencies and repeatedly put aside past assaults. As a result, ever-increasing
moral abscesses pocket our national and spiritual corpus.
-
- Even in the 1920s, Hollywood films attacked millennia-old
standards of feminine modesty through big screen spectacles of nearly naked
chorus girls. A horrified Christian America recoiled and, until about the
early 1950s, forbade most fundamentalist believers to even enter a movie
theater.
-
- But the church should have done more. It should have
named and shamed the Hollywood and "big three" TV networks, embarrassing
the Jewish community into pressuring their media brethren to back off.
The church would have encountered the inevitable Jewish charge of "anti-Semitism;"
but it should have spoken the whole truth, with specific continuous reproof
of Jewish corrupters. It should have desisted only when Jewish media respected
Americans' rights and morals. Shamed by godly rebuke and threatened with
delay of their grandiose messianic dreams, Jewish media could have found
a way to use their communication skills to regenerate, not degenerate.
-
- If our Christian ancestors a century ago stood up and
shouted, "No!" and named Jewish media moguls by the dozens, we
would probably not have homosexuality pushed down our throats by the heirs
of those Jewish corrupters today.
-
- Silence Empowered Evil
-
- Why didn't the church speak out? Because even then, it
was considered anti-Semitic to criticize "God's chosen people"-even
when their media was trashing Christian America! Tragically, such Christian
paralysis continued in the early sixties when pornographer Hugh Hefner
thrust his brassy, upscale Playboy pornography empire upon the world. The
hippie rebellion soon followed as big media encouraged repeated shock after
moral shock in the 1960s. It encouraged living together in fornication
as an alternative to marriage. Radical feminism emerged, led primarily
by Jewesses like Abzug, Friedan, and Steinem; they demanded abortions to
dispose of the unwanted babies conceived from "free love." By
1970, media's insistent encouragement of homosexuality erupted full force;
it continues to this hour. Now, Jewish promoters of pedophilia like Deborah
Kampmeier shock us with wide-screen child sex, a shock we will eventually
coexist with as Jewish media moves on, almost certainly to bestiality.
2
-
- Today, an obedient Christendom unquestioningly accepts
the right of Jews behind media to exist above scrutiny. No one in the Christian
right will publicly identify activist Jews as the popularizing force behind
pornography, premarital sex, the drug culture, homosexuality and lesbianism,
the theory of evolution and occultry, etc. Christians will phone media,
write emails, even boycott. But most agree that what Billy Graham described
as the "Jewish stranglehold" on the media is unmentionable and
unopposable.
-
- The truth is, any form of evil can be resisted if we
unloose the hand we have voluntarily, misguidedly tied behind our backs
and raise it to declare the whole truth while there is time. The very fact
I speak such truth to you now, disseminated through a free internet, powerfully
testifies that freedom is not yet dead. My name, Theodore Winston Pike,
was given in honor of two "rough writers," Theodore Roosevelt
and Winston Churchill. Until that time comes that Jesus prophesied, when
darkness will be so pervasive "no man can work," I, like Winston
Churchill, will continue to identify those who mastermind our destruction.
-
- Will you join me?
-
-
- Endnotes:
-
- 1. The famous Lichter-Rothman poll of 104 top media
executives in America revealed that 59 percent were "raised in the
Jewish religion" and predominately in favor of homosexuality and even
adultery. Public Opinion Magazine, December/January 1983.
-
- 2. Talmudic Judaism had a long and even profitable relationship
with bestiality during its 1600-year stay in Babylon, the moral gutter
of antiquity. The Talmud teaches that bestiality, performed in a "normal"
way by men or women is punishable. However, if a man or woman has "perverted"
sex with a beast, it no longer comes under the biblical prohibition of
"adultery." (Sanh.55a) This self-serving formula guaranteed a
steady flow of tithes from Jewish prostitutes and brothel owners engaged
in the thriving bestiality trade in Babylon and the ancient world. The
Talmud gives an example of how, if bestiality occurs in a perverted manner,
there is no guilt: "It once happened at Haitalu that while a young
woman was sweeping the floor a village dog covered her from the rear (a
case of unnatural intercourse) and Rabbi [Judah Hanassi] permitted her
to marry a priest." (Yeb. 59b).
-
- Although Moses commanded that priests "shall not
take a wife that is a whore, or profane," (Lev. 21:7), the rabbis
agreed, "a woman who has intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry
a priest." (Yeb, 59b) The Talmud footnote for this passage says: "Even
a high priest, the result of such intercourse be regarded as a mere wound"
-
- In Sota 26b, the question is asked, "What is the
statement which the rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection
with an animal? It answers: "It has been taught the hire of a dog
and the wages of a harlot are permissible "
-
- Yeb. 59b confirms "harlotry is not applicable to
bestial intercoursewe learned that the hire of a dog and the price of a
harlot are permitted [to be devoted to the treasury]." The footnote
to this passage says the payment of a harlot for intercourse with a dog,
evidently an act spectators paid to see, may be "consecrated to the
altar."
|