Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!


Another Reason NOT To Eat
Pork - MRSA Swine/Human

From Patricia Doyle, PhD
1-27-9
 
Hello Jeff - We have warned people time and again for more than ten years about the risks of eating meat. The post below shows that colonization of swine by MRSA was very common in one of two corporate swine production systems in the study below.
 
Eating beef is just as risky when it comes to MRSA as MRSA can be found in cattle, horses, dogs, cats, and as demonstrated below, swine.
 
Corporate farming with its crowded conditions and its over-use of antibiotics set the stage for development of these antibiotic resistant pathogens.
 
It is simply not worth the risk to eat pork or any other meat product.
 
Patty
 
 
STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS (METHICILLIN-RESISTANT), HUMAN, SWINE - USA: (IOWA, ILLINOIS)
 
Date: Fri 23 Jan 2009 Source: BrightSurf.com [edited] http://www.brightsurf.com/news/headlines/42671/Study_
finds_MRSA_in_Midwestern_swine_workers.html
 
 
"Our results show that colonization of swine by MRSA [methicillin-resistant _Staphylococcus aureus_] was very common in one of 2 corporate swine production systems we studied," said Tara Smith, PhD, associate professor of epidemiology in the University of Iowa College of Public Health and lead author of the study. "Because ST398 was found in both animals and humans, it suggests transmission between the 2. Our findings also suggest that once MRSA is introduced, it may spread broadly among both swine and their caretakers. Agricultural animals could become an important reservoir for this bacterium," Smith added.
 
_Staphylococcus aureus_, often called "staph," are bacteria commonly carried on the skin or in the nose of healthy people. MRSA is a type of staph that is resistant to the broad-spectrum antibiotics commonly used to treat it. A recent study estimated that MRSA caused 94 000 infections and more than 18 000 deaths in the United States in 2005.
 
MRSA has been found in a variety of animals, including horses, cattle, dogs, cats, and swine. Previous studies have shown that many swine and swine farmers in Canada and the Netherlands are colonized with MRSA. However, the University of Iowa study was the first to investigate carriage of MRSA among swine and swine farmers in the United States.
 
For the study, investigators analyzed nasal swabs of 299 swine and 20 swine workers from 2 different production systems in Iowa and Illinois. At Production System A, the overall prevalence of MRSA was 70 percent in swine and 64 percent in workers. At Production System B, all swine and human samples were negative for MRSA.
 
The researchers could not determine why System A had a high prevalence rate of MRSA among its swine and swine handlers, but listed several differences compared to System B. First, the systems raised different breeds of swine. Second, System A was an older, more established operation that had approximately twice the number of animals as System B. Third, both systems imported sows from different sources, raising the possibility that ST398 may have been introduced via live swine or pork products.
 
Other research has shown that ST398 accounts for 20 percent of all MRSA detected in the Netherlands, demonstrating the importance of considering livestock and other animals when examining the epidemiology of MRSA. "Iowa ranks 1st in the nation in swine production," Smith said. "Transmission of MRSA on swine farms or in veterinary facilities could complicate efforts to reduce MRSA transmission statewide and beyond."
 
The investigators recommended that future studies assess the risk of MRSA disease among swine workers and their contacts, survey retail meat products for MRSA contamination, study larger populations of swine and humans to define the epidemiology of MRSA within swine operations, and assess MRSA carriage rates in other livestock.
 
-- Communicated by: ProMED-mail Rapporteur Susan Baekeland
 
[Terry Singeltary <<mailto:flounder9@verizon.net>flounder9@verizon.net> is thanked for originally bringing to ProMED-mail's attention the journal article that prompted this news release: Smith TC, Male MJ, Harper AL, et al: Methicillin-Resistant _Staphylococcus aureus_ (MRSA) Strain ST398 Is Present in Midwestern U.S. Swine and Swine Workers. PLoS ONE 4(1): e4258. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004258, available at http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0004258>.
 
In this study, MRSA isolates were not typeable by pulsed field gel electro-phoresis (PFGE) using Sma-1, but digestion with EagI revealed that the isolates were clonal. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) documented that the isolates were ST398. The isolates were, however, not related to common human types in Iowa (USA100, USA300, and USA400). The investigators suggest that additional studies in larger populations will be needed to identify risk factors among the swine workers for acquisition of MRSA ST398.
 
This is not the 1st time that MRSA ST 398 was found in livestock and livestock workers in North America. Colonization with MRSA ST398 has recently been reported in pigs and pig farmers in Ontario, Canada (see ProMED-mail posting 20071109.3640). The investigators of the recent study in the United States point out that "a portion of the sows at PSA [production site A, where ST398 was found], were imported from Canada, while those from PSB [production site B, where ST398 was not found], originated in Michigan. Canada is the most important exporter of live hogs to the US. Thus, it is possible that ST398 may have been brought into the US via live swine or pork products."
 
[From Mod.ML's comments in a prior ProMED-mail post archive number 20080605.1799:
 
"Non-typeable (NT)-MRSA by pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using Sma-1 and belonging to multilocus sequence type (MLST) ST 398 initially was detected in the Netherlands in pigs and pig farmers in 2003. This strain of presumably animal origin (nearly 40 percent of pigs in the Netherlands have been found to be colonized by this strain) is now reported to be responsible for more than 20 percent of all MRSA infections in the Netherlands (http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/568512 -- subscription required), and has been found in community-associated human infections in several European countries, North America, and Asia. Nosocomial transmission of this strain has also been reported recently among patients and health care workers in the Netherlands http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/eccmid18/abstract.asp?id=69352"
 
 
 
Patricia A. Doyle DVM, PhD Bus Admin,
Tropical Agricultural Economics Univ of West Indies
Please visit my "Emerging Diseases" message board at: http://www.emergingdisease.org/phpbb/index.php
Also my new website: http://drpdoyle.tripod.com/
Zhan le Devlesa tai sastimasa
Go with God and in Good Health 

 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros