- The attack upon Mr. Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of
Economics at the University of Ottawa back in August of 2005 by B'nai Brith
Canada and the present attempt by Harry Abrams and the League for Human
Rights of B'nai Brith Canada to silence the owner and publisher of RadicalPress.com
is worthy of greater additional historic perspective in order to delineate
further the modus operandi of these instruments of political propaganda
and social control.
-
- To assist in comprehending the breadth and depth of this
universal scheme to silence dissent and permit an unleashed, purposeful
program of pro-Israeli propaganda to emerge throughout Canada's mainstream
media, one affecting both the mass mind of the citizenry as well as the
nation's legal and social fabric, it's imperative that concerned individuals
be aware of the nascent beginnings of organizations such as the B'nai Brith
and one of its more controversial offshoots known as the Anti-Defamation
League (A.D.L.). The latter organization, while rarely appearing in today's
controlled press due to its own self-induced ill-repute, is still a force
to be reckoned with and one of paramount influence in the false proselytizing
of the absurd notion of "anti-Semitism".
-
- In order to define this illogical phenomenon and expose
its nefarious purpose it is necessary that the reader be furnished with
some extensively researched commentary from a book written over fifty years
ago by a once famed (and now defamed) British author by the name of Douglas
Reed.
-
- In his virtually unknown, yet massively documented and
scholarly seminal work on the history of Political Zionism and its effects
upon the past and present global political situation, The Controversy of
Zion, [1] Mr. Douglas Reed, former Chief European war correspondent for
the London Times and successful author of numerous popular books written
prior to, during and after WW II, gives us some pertinent contextual information
concerning both the B'nai Brith and the A.D.L. which places the 2005 assault
upon Mr. Chossudovsky and my own case in the current CHRCommission complaint
against me and my website RadicalPress.com by this same Zionist organization
in a more clearly defined light.
-
- Reed was no slouch when it came to covering historical
events of his time and his first book, The Reichstag Fire, which appeared
in 1934 was proof of his ability to discern the maneuverings of factions
working behind the scenes to manipulate public perception, thwart reasonable
analysis and control agendas for ulterior purposes.
-
- Having spent seven years in Berlin and adjacent European
countries throughout the 1930s observing and discussing political strategy
with Prime Ministers and Kings, Reed was able to accumulate information
and impressions that most journalists would not otherwise be privy to.
As the pieces of the puzzling times began to take shape before his analytical
eye Reed eventually concluded that the hidden hand behind paradigm-shattering
decisions of the period was none other than that of the Political Zionists
and those in high office whom they were able to solicit for support.
-
- In 1938, on the eve of WW II, Reed began to notice, with
growing concern, that his submissions to the Times (which by then was under
Zionist control) were either being altered or eliminated altogether in
favour of stories that were the exact opposite of the real conditions which
he was witnessing on the ground in Germany and elsewhere. This frustration
eventually resulted in Reed resigning from the paper and publishing his
second book called Insanity Fair which was a summation of all that he had
gleaned of political events over the past seven years. The book was an
instant success throughout Britain, Europe and North America and its prophetic
warnings were soon to be revealed as truth when the second great world
war unfolded.
-
- In order to facilitate this much-needed perspective one
needs to cast an eye back almost a full century to the period of U.S. President
Woodrow Wilson's years in office and the time of the first world war. It
was during this era that the original silent coup by Zionist forces usurped
the independence of the White House and placed its exclusive powers in
the hands of Wilson's chief 'Advisor' Mr. Colonel House, a pro-Zionist
proponent.
-
- In his book Reed describes President Wilson as "a
captive president" as the war drew nigh and states that after his
election "Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he
should see or not receive, told Cabinet officers what they were to say
or not to say, and so on."[2]
-
- Reed, who was born in 1895 just two years prior to Theodor
Herzl (Political Zionism's official founder) setting up the World Zionist
Organization in 1897, grew up during the early years of the 20th Century
and came of age, politically-speaking, while living in Europe throughout
the thirties and forties and witnessing in detail the intimate machinations
by the world leaders who were then rearranging the pieces on the world's
political chessboard.
-
- In his exhaustive analysis of how the Zionists slowly,
but surely, overtook the U.S. government's executive levels of command,
the better to gain control of policy-making for the exclusive purpose of
acquiring the lands of Palestine to create their 'State' of Israel, Reed
emphasizes the crucial role played by groups such as the B'nai Brith and
the Anti-defamation League in blocking all criticism of their efforts through
the use of blackmail, intimidation and public vilification of the sort
we're now seeing employed in the case of B'nai Brith Canada vs RadicalPress.com
and what occurred during the time of Michel Chossudovsky's attack.
-
- It was after this period of initiation into the inner
workings of intrigue by the Zionist forces that he began voicing his comments
on the B'nai Brith. He writes:
-
- "At that period (1913) [of Colonel House and W.
Wilson, A.T.] an event occurred which seemed of little importance then
but needs recording here because of its later, large consequence. In America
was an organization called B'nai Brith (Hebrew for "Children of the
Covenant"). Founded in 1843 as a fraternal lodge exclusively for Jews,
it was called "purely an American institution", but it put out
branches in many countries and today claims to "represent all Jews
throughout the world", so that it appears to be part of the arrangement
described by Dr. Kastein[3] as "the Jewish international". In
1913 B'nai Brith put out a tiny offshoot, the "Anti-Defamation League".
It was to grow to great size and power; in it the state-within-states acquired
a kind of secret police and it will reappear in this story."[4]
-
- In Chapter 43, aptly titled "The Invasion of America",
Reed describes to a tee the techniques presently applied to RadicalPress.com
in order to discredit my person and my work and at the same time expunge
from the mass mind the true motives of Israeli domestic and foreign policies.
Please witness the following comments:
-
- "While military invasions and counter-invasions
multiplied during the six years of the Second War, absorbing all thought
and energy of the masses locked in combat, a silent invasion went on which
produced more momentous effects than the armed ones. This was the political
invasion of the American Republic and its success was shown by the shape
of American state policy at the war's end, which was so directed as to
ensure that the only military invasions that yielded enduring "territorial
gains" were those of the revolution into Europe and of the Zionists
into Arabia . . ."[5]
-
- "The renewal of large-scale immigration formed the
background to the political invasion of the Republic. This was a three-pronged
movement which aimed at the capture of the three vital points of a state's
defences: state policy at the top level, the civil services at the middle
level and "public opinion" or the mass-mind at the base. The
way in which control over acts of state policy was achieved (through the
"adviserships" which became part of American political life after
1913) has already been shown, this part of the process having preceded
the others. The methods used to attempt the capture of government services
will be discussed later in this chapter. In what immediately follows the
capture of the mass-mind in America, through control of published information,
will be described; it was indispensable to the other two thrusts.
-
- This form of political invasion is called by Dr. Weizmann[6],
who exhaustively studied it in his youth when he was preparing in Russia
for his life's work in the west, "the technique of propaganda and
the approach to the masses". The operation so described may now be
studied in actual operation:
-
- "Far back in this book the reader was invited to
note that "B'nai Brith" put out a shoot. B'nai Brith, until then,
might be compared with such groups of other religious affiliation as the
Young Men's Christian Association or the Knights of Columbus; its declared
objects were the help of the poor, sick and fatherless and good works in
general. The little offshoot of 1913, the "Anti-Defamation League",
had by 1947 become a secret police of formidable power in America.*
-
- "In Doublespeak "anti-defamation" means
"defamation" and this body lived by calumny, using such terms
as anti-semite, fascist, rabble-rouser, Jew-baiter, Red-baiter, paranoiac,
lunatic, madman, reactionary, diehard, bigot and more of the like. The
vocabulary is fixed and may be traced back to the attacks on Barruel, Robison
and Morse after the French revolution; the true nature of any writer's
or newspaper's allegiance may be detected by keeping count of the number
of times these trade-mark words are used. The achievement of this organization
(usually known as the A.D.L.) has been by iteration to make fetishes of
them, so that party politicians hasten to deny that they are any of these
things. Under this regime reasoned debate became outlawed; there is something
of sorcery in this subjugation of two generations of Western men to the
mumbo-jumbo of Asiatic conspirators.
-
- "When the A.D.L. was born in 1913 it had merely
desk-room in the parent B'nai Brith office and a tiny budget. In 1933 Mr.
Bernard J. Brown [a Jewish Chicago lawyer. A.T.] wrote, "Through the
intervention of the A.D.L. we have succeeded in muzzling the non-Jewish
press to the extent that newspapers in America abstain from pointing out
that any person unfavourably referred to is a Jew". In 1948 the Jewish
Menorah Journal of New York wrote, "Should but one phrase in a reprinted
literary classic reflect unjustly upon Jews, the A.D.L. will promptly belabour
the innocent publisher until he bowdlerizes the offending passage. Let
one innocent movie-producer incorporate a Jewish prototype, however inoffensive,
in his picture and the hue and cry raised by the A.D.L. will make him wish
he's never heard of Jews . . .
-
- "These quotations show the growth of the A.D.L.'s
power in thirty-five years. It has imposed the law of heresy on the public
debate in America. No criticism of Zionism or the world-government plan
is allowed to pass without virulent attack; . . .
-
- "America has today a few surviving writers who fight
on for independent debate and comment. They will discuss any public matter,
in the light of traditional American policy and interest, save Zionism,
which hardly any of them will touch. I have discussed this with four of
the leading ones, who all gave the same answer: it could not be done. The
employed ones would lose their posts, if they made the attempt. The independent
ones would find no publisher for their books because no reviewer would
mention these, save with the epithets enumerated above.[7]
-
- "The A.D.L., of such small beginnings in 1913, in
1948 had a budget of three million dollars (it is only one of several Jewish
organizations pursuing Zionist aims in America at a similar rate of expenditure).
The Menorah Journal, discussing "Anti-Defamation Hysteria", said,
"Fighting anti-semitism has been built up into a big business, with
annual budgets running into millions of dollars". It said the object
was "to continue beating the anti-semitic drum" and "to
scare the pants off prospective contributors" in order to raise funds.
It mentioned some of the methods used ("outright business blackmail;
if you can't afford to give $10,000 to this cause, you can take your business
elsewhere"), and said American Jews were being "stampeded into
a state of mass-hysteria by their self-styled defenders.""[8]
-
- An interesting point which Reed made back in the 1950s,
and which today is probably more relevant considering the 1984ish times
we're living in, involved one of the current icons of anti-dictatorship
and anti-totalitarianism, Mr. George Orwell. According to Reed even Orwell
succumbed in some measure to the then pervasive pressures being exerted
on the general public by these agents of one world government. He states:
-
- "Mass-hysteria" is not only produced among
Jews and band-wagon politicians by this method; it produces another kind
of mass-hysteria among earnest but uninformed people of the "Liberal"
kind: the mass-hysteria of self-righteousness, which is a tempting form
of self-indulgence. The late Mr. George Orwell was of those who helped
spread "mass-hysteria" in this way. He was a good man, because
he did not merely incite others to succour the weak and avenge injustice,
but went himself to fight when the Civil War broke out in Spain, then discovering
that Communism, when he saw it, was worse than the thing which (as he thought)
he set out to destroy. He died before he could go to Palestine and experience
any similar enlightenment, so that what he wrote about "anti-semitism"
was but the echo of "anti-defamationist hysteria". It is so good
an example of this that I quote it; here a man of goodwill offered, as
his own wisdom, phrases which others poured into his ear.
-
- "He explored "anti-semitism in Britain"
(1945) and found " a perceptibly anti-semitic strain in Chaucer".
Mr. Hilaire Belloc and Mr. G.K.Chesterton were "literary Jew-baiters".
He found passages in Shakespeare, Smollett, Thackeray, Shaw, T.S. Eliot,
Aldous Huxley and others "which if written now would be stigmatized
as anti-semitism" (he was right without knowing it; if written now
they would have been stigmatized). Then he suffered what Americans call
a pratfall. He said that "offhand, the only English writers I can
think of who, before the days of Hitler, made a definite effort to stick
up for Jews are Dickens and Charles Reade". Thus he extolled one of
the A.D.L.'s "Jew-baiters" as a champion of Jews; in America
the film of Oliver Twist was banned because of Fagin! This was the work
of the A.D.L.; its representative, a Mr. Arnold Forster, announced:
-
- "American movie-distributors refused to become involved
in the distribution and exhibition of the motion picture after the A.D.L.
and others expressed the fear that the film was harmful; the Rank Organization
withdrew the picture in the United States". Later the picture was
released after censorship by the A.D.L.; "seventy two eliminations"
were made at its command and a prologue was added assuring beholders that
they might accept it as "a filmization of Dickens without anti-semitic
intentions". (In occupied Berlin the A.D.L. ban was final; the British
authorities ordered Dickens withdrawn from German eyes).
-
- "I was in America at this time and thus saw the
fulfilment of a prediction made in a book of 1943, when I wrote that, as
the secret censorship was going, Chaucer, Shakespeare and Dickens would
one day be defamed as "anti-semites". I thought to strain probability,
to make a point, but it happened in all three cases: a Shakespearean actor-manager
visiting New York was ordered not to play The Merchant of Venice, Dickens
was banned, and the defamationists put Chaucer on their black-list.
-
- "A private organization which can produce such results
is obviously powerful; there is nothing comparable in the world. Mr. Vincent
Sheehan wrote in 1949, "There is scarcely a voice in the United States
that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight
criticism of the Zionist high command is immediately labelled as anti-semitic".
. .
-
- "How is the oracle worked? By what means has America
(and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires
to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out
his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to Zion? How have presidents and
prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like
bridesmaids for the bride's bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves
to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for Zion, or to be herded
on to Zionist platforms to receive "plaques" for services rendered?
-
- "The power of money and the prospect of votes have
demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest
weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on
what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes,
and so to be able to give any selected person a "good" or a "bad"
press. This is in fact control of "the mob". In today's language
it is "the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses",
as Dr. Weizmann said, but it is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described,
on a famous occasion, by Saint Matthew and Saint Mark: "The chief
priests and elders persuaded the multitude . . . The chief priests moved
the people . . ."
-
- "In forty years the A.D.L. perfected a machine for
persuading the multitude. It is a method of thought-control of which the
subject-mass is unconscious and its ability to destroy any who cry out
is great . . .
-
- "The A.D.L. (and the American Jewish Committee)
"set out to make the American people aware of anti-semitism".
It informed Jews that "25 out of every 100 Americans are infected
with anti-semitism", and that another 50 might develop the disease.
By 1945 it was carrying out "a high-powered educational program, geared
to reach every man, woman and child" in America through the press,
radio, advertising, children's comic books and school books, lectures,
films, "churches" and trade unions. This programme included "219
broadcasts a day", full-page advertisements in 397 newspapers, poster
advertizing in 130 cities, and "persuasions" subtly incorporated
in the printed matter on blotters, matchbox covers, and envelopes. The
entire national press ("1900 dailies with a 43,000,000 circulation")
and the provincial, Negro, foreign-language and labour newspapers were
kept supplied with, "and used", its material in the form of "news,
background material, cartoons and comic strips". In addition, the
A.D.L. in 1945 distributed "more than 330,000 copies of important
books carrying our message to libraries and other institutions", furnished
authors with "material and complete ideas", and circulated nine
million pamphlets "all tailored to fit the audiences to which they
are directed". It found "comic books" to be a particularly
effective way of reaching the minds of young people, soldiers, sailors
and airmen, and circulated "millions of copies" of propaganda
in this form. Its organization consisted of the national headquarters,
public relations committees in 150 cities, eleven regional offices, and
"2,000 key men in 1,000 cities".
-
- "The name of the body which supplied this mass of
suggestive material never reached the public. During the 1940's the system
of "syndicated writers" in New York or Washington enveloped the
entire American press. One such writer's column may appear in a thousand
newspapers each day; editors like this system, which saves them the cost
of employing their own writers, for its cheapness. Through a few dozen
such writers the entire stream of information can be tinctured at its source
. . . By all these means a generation has been reared in America (and this
applies equally to England [and Canada. A.T.]) which has been deprived
of authentic information about, and independent comment on, the nature
of Zionism, its original connection with Communism, the infestation of
administrations and capture of "administrators", and the relationship
of all this to the ultimate world-government project." [9]
-
- In 1949 Douglas Reed travelled throughout the United
States prior to writing his book, Far and Wide, which was his first-hand
impressions of America and a final summation of the influences that Political
Zionism was having upon the nation to that point. It was to be his final
publication prior to the Zionists imposing a general ban on his works which
eventually led to a virtual annulling of his name in published circles
around the world.
-
- His conclusions though have, as in the case of Insanity
Fair again proven to be the most prophetic of the 20th Century in terms
of how the Zionist agenda functions and what its ends are designed to produce.
As he states in a chapter called "Zionism Paramount", America
suffers from "three servitudes": those being the influences of
Russian Communism (a product of Zionism) which had infiltrated the bureaucratic
levels of government during Roosevelt's tenure as president; the debilitating
effects of organized crime; and the greatest of all, Political Zionism.
He writes:
-
- "The three forces which weaken the whole structure
of American public life in effect serve the strongest among themselves,
Political Zionism, which stands behind the seats of the mighty while the
others work in lesser places, if to similar ends of power-over-politicians.
The proof of this supremacy is to be found by a simple test: the extent
to which public discussion is permitted . . . At the topmost level, a virtual
ban on public discussion of Political Zionism proves the paramountcy of
its sway in American affairs. As in England, the open expression of doubt
about this territorial ambition, and support for it, has been almost driven
underground in recent years. An imperial thrall has been laid on America
in this matter. Traditional Americans, whose forebears detested laws of
lese-majesty and the genuflections of courts, now find their leaders performing
an even humbler obeisance in this direction; like foremost politicians
in England, they thus emulate those Rumanian nobles who long bowed to the
Sultan's rule, vainly hoping to keep rank and possessions. The Soviet ban
on 'anti-Semitism' (which was in effect a veto on public discussion of
the origins of Communism) has in practice been extended to the British
island and the American Republic in the matter of Political Zionism. It
is lese-majesty [i.e. treason A.T.] in a new form and because of it present-day
Americans and Englishmen do not as a rule see the grave future courses
and penalties to which support of Political Zionism has committed them."[10]
-
- It takes little extrapolating to see that all which Reed
described in his foregoing comments dovetails smoothly with the apparent
convoluted, confusing and tumultuous period that we're now experiencing
in global politics where the blatant effort on the part of the Zionist
Jew Lobbies in Canada and the USA to censor free speech on the net is increasing
with furor. What is essential here is that readers note the connectedness
of events and the fact that the Political Zionists are still very much
alive and alert to their diligent and determined effort to destroy the
sovereignty of nation-states, serve the interests of Israel and bring in
the ill-fated New World Order under the auspices of their original plan,
the United Nations.
-
- To those end organizations such as B'nai Brith Canada
and the A.D.L. have evolved and continue to act as Zionist watchdogs and
public censors. It is not surprising therefore that they would eventually
attack writers such as Michel Chossudovsky and now myself for Political
Zionism's bold and ambitious plans for global dominance owes allegiance
only to its proponents and thus their exclusive and racial policies of
imperialism and apartheid as per Palestine continue to pose a direct threat
to both the Christian and Moslem world. Our ultimate freedom therefore
depends upon our ability to combat this censorship of free speech which
continually keeps the occult nature of Political Zionism hidden from the
public eye.
-
- ----
- Arthur Topham is the publisher/editor of the RadicalPress.com
. He lives in British Columbia, Canada and can be contacted at <mailto:radical@radicalpress.com>radical@radicalpress.com
-
- * In fact though not in form. The secret police in countries
where the institution is native (Hitler's Gestapo was copied from the Asiatic
model, which had a century-old tradition in Russia and Turkey) have their
entire power and resources of the state behind them; indeed, they are the
state. In America Zionism built the nucleus of a secret police nearly as
effective in many ways as those prototypes. It could only become equally
effective if it gained full control of the state's resources, including
the power of arrest and imprisonment, and in my judgment that was the ultimate
goal.
-
- Footnotes:
-
- [1] The book can be found in the U.S.A. at Abebooks.com
.
-
- [2] Controversy of Zion, Page 242
-
- [3] Dr. Joseph Kastein according to Reed was a "zealous"
Zionist historian who wrote the book, History and Destiny of the Jews,
(Eng. trans., London, 1933). He is extensively quoted by Douglas Reed in
his book Controversy of Zion.
-
- [4] Controversy of Zion, Page 243
-
- [5] Controversy of Zion, Page 339
-
- [6] Dr. Chaim Weizmann was a tireless proponent of Zionism.
Having supplanted Theodor Herzl as the leader of the World Zionist Organization
back in 1904 his influence throughout the formative years of the first
half of the 20th Century upon the creation of Israel is well documented.
He eventually became Israel's first Prime Minister in 1948.
-
- [7] Reed had first-hand experience of this practise.
In 1952 the Canadian Jewish Congress requested that Canadian booksellers
refuse to carry his books.
-
- [8] Controversy of Zion, Pages 340 - 342
-
- [9] Controversy of Zion, Pages 342-345
-
- [10] Far and Wide, Page 274.
|