Instead of giving away Billions and Trillions of dollars to private companies as well as to Israel and investing in wars on foreign grounds, this lard-brick government should be dividing that money up and giving it back to individual US citizens

as Restitution. For almost 100 years, our meager wages have been extorted from us via taxes that we did not Constitutionally owe. After a Restitution refund, we the People, could then stimulate the economy. 

A Restitution would mean we would no longer all be broke as the result of a disgusting government that worships war, Zionism, banksters, and big business. With Restitution, we the People could then put our money into American products and services that deserve to be supported. 

Taxes should be derived from corporate profits. In this manner, the corporations 

give back a portion of their corporate profits to the government, which can then give that money back to the People who helped generate those profits in the first place.  This can all be repeated indefinitely, or merely when the economy needs stimulation.  The People can stimulate the economy again and again as long as they are not kept as paupers by a corporate-owned government that is hell-bent on providing welfare to private companies. 

According to a Government Accountability Office study, however, "about 25 percent of the largest US companies paid no federal income taxes in 2005 despite $1.1 trillion in sales that year." From 1998 through 2005, the study reports that 72 percent of all foreign corporations and about 57 percent of US companies paid no federal income taxes for at least one of those years.  

Adding salt to the enormous "bailout" wounds, it is now being reported that some of the companies enjoying the trillions in bailout funds owe overdue federal taxes in excess of $220 million. "Law" forbids releasing the names of the guilty companies, thus indicating that not only can giant companies get away with highway robbery (or murder), but they can do so while hidden in anonymity. It is time to hold companies accountable for their actions, not reward them for criminal activity and bad judgment. The bailout funds should be given to the People as Restitution, not forked over to businesses that are too big to be of honest benefit to anyone at this point.

A Restitution plan would give a voice back to the People, end welfare and socialism, people would not have to depend upon horrible jobs or handouts, and they could devote their time to lovingly growing their family's own organic foods if they wanted to do so. Giant corporations serving themselves rather than the public would deservedly fall apart. With Restitution, mothers could stay at home and raise their own children instead of paying strangers to do this most important job.  Dads could do the same. Restitution would give us a chance to pay cash for our purchases or barter. It would eliminate usury, encourage and create smaller businesses and healthy competition, re-establish the importance of the family, cut back government, keep jobs and production in America, and eliminate the need for health insurance. Restitution would also mean that funds going to support the Israeli military would be used here at home instead of in a land stolen from its ancestral owners, the Palestinians. Without funding, Israel would therefore be forced to stop its vicious and illegal military attacks on civilian refugees. 

Restitution would allow us to have a healthier, stress-free nation. But most importantly, it would allow us all to have our first taste of peace in about 100 years.

-----------------

Mary Sparrowdancer is an internationally published author of a bestselling book, The Love Song. As an investigative journalist, she is currently exposing a large, developing antitrust case involving Sean Dix vs. Johnson&Johnson, CNN and DOJ, which can be seen by typing  CNN J&J into a Google search.

www.sparrowdancer.com

References:

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1249465620080812

http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/daily-brief/2009/03/19/
next-scandal-unpaid-corporate-taxes

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=
/c/a/2008/11/26/MNVN14C8QR.DTL&o=0