Apparently the article I quoted from below was a
hoax; However the challenges I raised about the legalities and
the legal profession are real; just as Obama's fraud upon the public
has always been the case. When I wrote the article I did not know that
the "story" I based my comments on was false. This article
will be removed - because of the designed HOAX in the original story
- but the Actions of the Supreme Court, the White House and Obama himself
constitute the real deception here - if I had known in advance of course
I would not have written the article.
Jim Kirwan 6-18-9
- "In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama's
qualifications for the presidency, the group "Americans for Freedom
of Information" has released copies of President Obama's college transcripts
from Occidental College. Released today, the transcript indicates that
Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign
student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school. The transcript
was released by Occidental College in compliance with a court order in
a suit brought by the group in the Superior Court of California. The transcript
shows that Obama (Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a
fellowship for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship
program. To qualify for the scholarship, a student must claim foreign citizenship."
- This is the man now sitting in the oval office that we're
talking about above. He is also a lawyer; that is a sworn officer of the
courts system, and a member of the Bar that actually taught Constitutional
Law in Illinois, before running for the office he now occupies.
- This immediately brings up a number of direct conflicts
of interest that in themselves create several indefensible positions for
the fraud that Barack Hussein Obama, formerly Barry Soetoro, truly appears
to be. How could Obama the lawyer not know that he took grant money for
financial aid, from the Fulbright Foundation that was intended only for
foreign citizens? How then to square this with his supposed Naturalized
American-citizen status that he claimed in order to run for president?
He cannot be both things in the same person; especially not at the same
- Also Obama is a lawyer so how can he excuse himself,
from lying under oath, either as a president or as a candidate; not-to-mention
deceiving the public as to his actual qualifications for the office he
now supposedly holds?
- "This document would seem to provide the smoking
gun that many of Obama's detractors have been seeking. Along with the evidence
that he was first born in Kenya and there is no record of him ever applying
for US citizenship, this is looking pretty grim. The news has created a
firestorm at the White House as the release casts increasing doubt about
- Obama's legitimacy and qualification to serve as president.
When reached for comment in London, where he has been in meetings with
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Obama smiled but refused comment on
- There are far more lawyers in America than almost any
other profession-so how is it that as a professional body lawyers have
remained silent on so many aspects of this quagmire? For instance what
has the National Bar Association said about these apparent conflicts of
interest between Obama's oath as a lawyer vs. his oath as the president?
But there's an even more basic question which has to do with how does Obama
balance the lies he routinely tells the world, as opposed to his duty as
an officer before the National Bar of Justice? Internationally, our commander-in-chief
has placed himself and his administration even further beyond the laws
than even Cheney and George W. Bush dared to go-on top of all his campaign
promises that have been massively shattered at almost every turn!
- "Britain's Daily Mail has also carried the story
in a front-page article titled, "Obama Eligibility Questioned,"
leading some to speculate that the story may overshadow economic issues
on Obama's first official visit to the U.K. In a related matter, under
growing pressure from several groups,Justice Antonin Scalia announced that
the Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to hear
- arguments concerning Obama's legal eligibility to serve
as President in a case brought by Leo Donofrio of New Jersey.
- This lawsuit claims Obama's dual citizenship disqualified
him from serving as president. Donofrio's case is just one of 18 suits
brought by citizens demanding proof of Obama's citizenship or qualification
to serve as president."
- The interesting aspects of this quagmire concern the
following: How many times has Barack Hussein Obama lied to get where he
is today. If he was not a citizen; how was he able to pass the bar and
take the oath to enforce the law that he was breaking by swearing to uphold
the constitution of a country that he was not clearly a citizen of? When
he ran for and won an office in the State Legislature and again when he
ran for and won the office of US Senator for the State of Illinois-both
those jobs require swearing an oath of office that, if his birth certificate
was not valid; had to have been illegally held-yes?
- Moreover, as a lawyer now, and a former professor of
Constitutional law: how can he continue to do the massively illegal things
that he is doing each and every day as resident dictator from the oval
office? Why has Obama the man, not been disbarred for cause? Also in matters
of legality, the office has the White House Office of legal affairs that
comes with the job but as an officer of the courts: Obama is technically
not allowed to run roughshod over all the settled laws of the United States-which
he has been doing with intensity of late.
- Does Obama bear an even greater responsibility when as
Commander-in-Thief he orders things like illegal torture and expanded illegal
wire-taps; along with claiming for himself and the administration special
privileges when it comes down to abiding by the laws or crushing them under
the jack-boots of his 'administration's long term goals?
- Perhaps this glaring statistic might shed some real-time
light on that topic?
- "Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation
has released the results of their investigation of Obama's campaign spending.
This study estimates that Obama has spent upwards of $950,000 in campaign
funds in the past year with eleven law firms in 12 states for legal resources
to block disclosure of any of his personal records?"
- Mr. Kreep indicated that the investigation is still ongoing
but that the final report will be provided to the U.S. Attorney General,
- Mr. Holder has refused to comment on the matter".
- There is also the rumor that Michelle Obama's license
to practice law in the State of Illinois was revoked-but so far at least
no one seems to be able to get to the bottom of that additional bit of
current presidential folklore.
- Why should not Obama be prosecuted for fraud against
the people, and if this pans out, will this equal possible treason against
the country; depending on how deeply his lies have gone into the blood
and bone of the constitution that his directives have been aimed directly
at, on how many different occasions?
- In effect when Barack Obama was specifically asked about
what the change would look like, prior to being selected, he said: "I
AM THE CHANGE." The inference being that 'change' was not so much
about policies to be made, but rather it would be confined to his person
as the new face that is the holder of the title who had taken over from
the old face that was his predecessor. This goes a long way toward understanding
why the new face does not want to prosecute the old face; since they both
were and are working on the same unholy goals and illegal wars-but mainly
on the enslavement and destruction of this country as a viable nation.
That's why Cheney Bush are not being prosecuted; because in every instance
Obama has now exceeded anything that Cheney-Bush ever did before he arrived.
- We need the non-lawyers in Washington to investigate
the selection that sits in the Oval Office as resident dictator. The public
needs to get some straight answers about just what and who our lawyer-leader-dictator
really is. Most of all we need to know to what or to whom does he actually
owes his allegiance as president! If he cannot clarify these things then
he needs to be removed from office and publicly tried for what he has attempted
to do beyond the laws of this country and the constitution!
- NOTE: The quoted passages above are from Carl F. Worden
- IF ALL THIS IS TRUE, OBAMA IS IN REAL TROUBLE -- Worden