- ' On the first Feminian Sandstones, we were promised
the fuller life, which started by loving our neighbour, and ended by loving
his wife. Till our women had no more children, and the men lost reason
and faith, and the gods of the copybook heading read, "The Wages Of
Sin Is Death." '
- Rudyard Kipling.
-
- This article is about how the Illuminati, through a multitude
of means and `methods` are engaged in a war against the rest of mankind.
It is a war unlike any other in human history insomuch as it is being conducted
without one of the sides in the conflict knowing about it. One of the major
objectives in this war is the culling of the population, some say by as
much as 80%. In this series of articles, I will attempt to show how it
is being done, and why.
-
- Contrary to what the Globalist Elite of the `Good Club`
(see Part One) will have you believe, we are not threatened by overpopulation.
<http://www.pop.org/briefings/robpoor.htm>We are now suffering from
underpopulation. The US birthrate has been cut from 4 down to 2 children
per woman, the European and Canadian is 1.5. (We need 2.2 just for replacement.)
Russia will see its population plummet from 145 million to 115 million
by 2015, and all the other Western nations face the same threat to their
posterity. The West is looking down the barrel of a demographic catastrophe
which has no precedent in human history, inasmuch as its population is
seemingly opting for its own extinction, by its pursuit of a humanistic,
hedonistic and sex- obsessed materialistic lifestyle, based on the insidious
machinations of Masonic Luciferianism.
-
- "Any society is free to choose either to display
great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom. The evidence is that it can't
do both for more than one generation." Anthropologist J.D. Unwin.
-
- In this, the second part of `To Kill A Tree,` we will
look at how the `Power` has used the women's movement to further its agenda,
and how, in doing so, it has debased the feminine, alienated women from
men, been instrumental in the collapse of the family, and been a major
cause in the plummeting birth rate here in the West. We will look at the
effects of contraception and abortion, and then, in the next in the series,
examine how, on a global scale, women have been the victims of an all-out
assault on their persons, via the use of propaganda, pharmaceuticals and
other science-based methods which have brought them, mostly unwittingly,
into the very eye of the Depopulation Agenda storm.
-
- Feminism: Feminism and feminists have played a front-line
role in the Illuminati's war against humankind. I think I must have been
around twenty-three years of age and fresh out of the military when I began
to realize that Feminism had very little to do with women's rights. Instead,
it appeared to me, even back then, to have more to do with population control.
One of the most obvious results of societies adopting feminist ideals is
a decline in the birthrate. In 1990 author Katerina Runske wrote a book
entitled `Empty Hearts and Empty Homes,` in which she addressed the inevitable
result of the feminist's anti-male anti-marriage rhetoric, along with a
damning indictment on abortion: "Feminism is a Darwinian blind alley.
In biological terms, there is nothing that identifies a maladaptive pattern
so quickly as a below replacement level of reproduction. An immediate consequence
of feminism is what appears to be an irreversible decline in the birthrate.
Nations pursue feminist policies at their peril."
-
- With the advent of the welfare state and the promise
of a `cradle to grave` social security net, children were no longer regarded
as a necessary insurance against want and need in old age. If women earned
enough to to gain financial independence, then marriage was no longer essential.
And, with contraception made freely available, along with the ever-present
backup of abortion waiting in the wings, the modern feminist could behave
as immorally as she wished, have as much sex as she wanted, and avoid all
those unnecessary complications of being a wife and mother. By `liberating`
women and consequently men of the burden of family, the `Illuminists` have
in essence made the family redundant. Families as we knew them have begun
to disappear and when they go, our civilisation goes with them.
-
- In his article `The Devil's Work,` Henry Makow writes:
` Feminism fits the elite's depopulation agenda. Since 1963, when "The
Feminine Mystique" was published we have experienced an unprecedented
breakdown in the family. More than half of all children are now born out
of wedlock; the number of single parent households has tripled. Reproduction
requires the most delicate care. In the case of human beings, the female
must be prepared for motherhood and honored for her contribution to society.
The male must be shown that the standard of manhood is to provide leadership
and sustenance for mother and children. Both mother and father must be
able to give their children intellectual and spiritual guidance. Instead,
in schools and universities, the tender shoots of feminine sexuality are
crushed under the feminist jackboot. Young women are taught that heterosexual
sex, marriage and family are inherently oppressive. Homosexuality on the
other hand is an act of rebellion that is "chic" and "normal."
Friedan's comparison of mothers with the concentration camp inmates is
pertinent. Betty Friedan, agent of the elite cabal, has put mothers in
the concentration camp. Mothers!? <http://www.conceptual.net.au/~jackc/depopulation.htm>The
ultimate aim is genocide. The Elite want the world's population to be much
smaller. Can there be any question that this is the devil's work?`
-
- In the sixties, something fundamental occurred which
altered the way women viewed their lives and degraded in them the desire
to be wives and mothers. That something was `Second Wave Feminism` inspired
by the likes of Communists Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem, along with
the editor of `Cosmopolitan` magazine, Helen Gurley Brown and Britain's
Germaine Greer, all coordinated by the CIA and provably bought and paid
for by the Rockerfeller Foundation (see Henry Makow's Book `The Cruel Hoax`
and the links below). With a new generation hitting the university campuses,
these Marxist demagogues in disguise had a fresh and naive crop of young
women to mold and manipulate. All restraint seemed to collapse, and a `new`
unbiblical gauge for measuring morality appeared in order to justify the
explosion in promiscuity and immorality.
-
- Women, having been told by the demagogues that they were
`slaves` in their own homes, chose en masse to sell themselves to employers
instead, who then used them as little more than `wage slaves` or mere commodities.
Rather than fulfill their divinely appointed mission as wives and mothers,
both loved and cherished by their husbands and children, women today have
been guided into turning their backs on all that was once considered rich
and rewarding in exchange for pandering themselves to the `gods` of the
marketplace.
-
- In `The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the
State,` Marx and Engels wrote: " The first condition for the liberation
of the wife is to bring the whole female sex into public industry and this
in turn demands the abolition of the monogamous family as the economic
unit of society." It is no coincidence that global capitalism today
views women as units of production, liberated from husbands, family and
home in exactly the same terms as did the two fathers of Communism.
-
- In his article `When men become women and women become
men,` the Danish writer Kjeld Heising writes: "The modern career woman
is labour - flexible, change ready, committed and willing to learn. A resource
to be utilised, compliant, fitting in easily wherever needed, ready to
share a desk with both men and women. As such, she has become the `worker
ant` for the global market."
-
- Contrary to what the `High Priestesses` of Feminism have
been propagating for decades, their ideology has not liberated women. It
has enslaved them completely. The role of the modern career woman appears
to me more akin to that of a `serf,` a `bondwoman,` tied to the state through
her taxes, and to her employer through her labour. Somewhere in between,
if married, she juggles her remaining `freedoms` between her often neglected
husband and her children, parents, and what friends and leisure pursuits
she has time for. True freedom is about having control over one's life;
the freedom to pursue personal fulfillment through love, joy, creativity
and a sense of familial duty. Slaves are there to work! Mothers are free
and nurturing souls.
-
- Feminism has caused a huge fracture in society. Young
women are kept busy with their education and careers, and they content
themselves with the illusion, that there awaits for them, once they have
proved that they can be all that they can be, a life of excitement, romance,
husband and children. They can have it all, they are told. But it's a marketplace
illusion. Many are in reality destroying any chance they may have of finding
true happiness through love, marriage and family, by their casual and often
promiscuous sexual behavior and their disrespect for themselves and their
bodies.
-
- Young men today are also occupied with their education
and career and unfortunately all too often treat women in the same way
they do other consumer products: a commodity to be consumed and discarded.
They too may also have some far-off non committal idea of someday having
a family, but it doesn't run so deeply, and is low down on their list of
priorities. Having a good time is the main thing. Most seem to accept their
newfound socio-political impotence, and due to an uncertainty of what their
role in the great scheme of things is, content themselves with a life of
hedonistic irresponsibility. Those who are politically conscious, and there
aren't that many, lay the full blame for their emasculation on women, and
they hate them for it.. This does not a fruitful generation make.
-
- Henry Makow, in his book `The Cruel Hoax,` explains that
Feminism was created in order to destabilise society and create dysfunctional
people. Feminism working indirectly on social norms creates isolation,
rootlessness, breaks down communities, and denies our nature as men and
women. It has been fatal where families and reproduction are concerned.
Few if any young women today place a very high priority on being wives
and mothers. For years before I had any knowledge of the `Depopulation
Agenda,` I had been able to equate the decline in the birth rates here
in the West with the so-called `women's movement.` Now I see it for what
it truly is: A form of `Final Solution` to what the Illuminati term `the
population problem.` But for the moment, let us continue to unravel the
Feminist `ball of string.`
-
- Feminists demanded the same `rights` as men. But nature
designed men and women differently and a solution to the reproductive issue
had to be found. Enter the contraceptive pill, or as Pat Buchanan terms
it, `The Suicide Pill Of The West.` First licensed in 1960, 43% of married
American women were using it by 1970.
-
- On its website, the UN Population Fund states: `Forty
years after oral contraceptives were first introduced on May 9, 1960, more
than 100 million women rely on them, making them the most popular contraceptive
method in 78 of 150 surveyed countries, according to a new report from
the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Outside of China and India,
the pill is the most popular contraceptive method, used by some 12% of
married women, according to the latest issue of Population Report, the
quarterly journal published by the Johns Hopkins Population Information
Program. (In China and India family planning programs have emphasized long-term
or permanent methods.) Outside Eastern Europe and Asia, an estimated 36%
of sexually active unmarried women in developed countries use this method.
(For country-by-country statistics on oral contraceptive use, see link
http://www.overpopulation.org/birthcon.html).`
-
- Abortion: As the article on the examiner.com site (http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-3515-Denver-Political-
Issues-Examiner~y2009m5d16-m5d16) , that inspired this series maintains,
there are now annually 46 million abortions carried out worldwide. For
those Danish readers out there, that's the equivalent of 9.2 Denmark's
being killed each year. This makes abortion by far the most common and
oft performed surgical procedure in modern medicine. It was in 1973 that
the landmark case known in US legal history as Roe v Wade opened the floodgates
that have lead us to this most deplorable situation, where innocent human
life is regarded as disposable. I do not argue that there are circumstances
where abortion may be the only humane recourse, such as in rape cases where
the victim falls pregnant. But we have now reached the point where abortion
is considered a `failsafe` or a backup to the `Pill` and, what's more,
it is being encouraged and used as a major weapon in the global war against
populations, causing the wholesale slaughter of the most vulnerable members
of our species.
-
- What has made Western women so hostile to the idea of
being mothers? Thankfully, when I was born in 1958, in what was regarded
back then as a state of illegitimacy, abortion was still regarded not only
as a crime, but as a gross act of immorality, otherwise you might not be
reading this article. Yet fifteen years later, the US Supreme Court ruling
which declared abortion a constitutional right was extolled as a landmark
in social progress.
-
- Today, to be `pro life` is regarded by most where I live,
at least, as being reactionary and, in the case of a man, sexist. Yet the
need to procreate is mankind's most intrinsic and basic instinct, which
the Illuminist-backed Feminists and their full entourage of fellow travellers
are interfering with; and, as we supposedly `progress ' into this 21st
century, we are treading upon very thin ice indeed. To deny our God-given
nature, to turn our back on all that is moral and decent is a slippery
slope towards oblivion.
-
- A Woman's Right? Recently I read an emotive story in
a British newspaper which caused a very disturbed reaction within me, as
it told of a fifteen-year-old girl who had an abortion. The poignant handwritten
diary entry in its childish, rounded letters says it all: 'I had my termination.`
. Then in brackets underneath: "[killed my baby].` Through these few
words, one can only guess at the turmoil in the mind of this young girl
as she struggled to come to terms with what she had done. After noting
the event in the impersonal jargon used by the professionals who handled
her case, she revealed in simple terms how it actually felt to her. Not
a 'termination,' but the killing of her baby. Tragic as this was, the really
appalling thing was her isolation from her parents. In need of parental
guidance and support more than at any time in her life, she had been effectively
abandoned to make this decision and cope with its aftermath on her own.
-
- For the doctors who dealt with her had not told her parents
on the grounds of 'patient confidentiality.' The girl, frightened of what
they might say, had said she didn't want to tell her mother. So her GP,
who took a mere 15 minutes to see her, simply referred her on to the hospital
which carried out the abortion. The first her mother knew of what had happened
was when she read the entry in her daughter's diary. What have we come
to when a girl barely out of childhood herself can have an abortion, a
procedure with huge physical, emotional and moral ramifications, without
the advice and care of her parents, because they have been deliberately
kept in ignorance of what is happening?
-
-
- On every count, this incident illustrates either a widespread
breakdown of responsibility, care and common sense, or a deliberate severing
of `roots` by disconnecting the girl from her parents. It also shows how
far we have allowed the now commonplace practice of abortion to degrade
our own sensibilities. An abortion is traumatic for any woman, let alone
a child. It is an event of great significance and difficulty, requiring
a balance to be struck between the needs of the mother and respect for
the early life she is carrying. When that mother is herself effectively
a child, it takes on a further dimension altogether.
-
-
- Under UK law, a girl under 16 years of age can have an
abortion without her parents' consent, if her GP thinks she is mature enough
to make the decision herself. That means understanding the moral, social
and emotional implications of what she is about to do. But the teenager's
behaviour in this case illustrates what should be blindingly obvious to
anyone with an ounce of compassion or common sense, that such young girls
are too immature to make decisions of this kind. The girl has since commented
that if her mother had been told, she might have kept the baby. I cannot
help but wonder if there is a conspiratorial aspect to this. Are doctors,
when dealing with such matters, aware that there is a hidden conspiracy
at the very top to encourage women to choose abortion, or under instruction
to bear in mind that if a patient's parents are fully involved in the process,
there is more likelihood of the unborn child being kept alive and any planned
abortion cancelled?
-
-
- The girl's parents in this particular case are understandably
distraught. As the mother says, she was expected to be by her daughter's
side when she had her tonsils out. Yet when it came to an abortion, with
its momentous physical and emotional consequences, she and the girl's father
were deliberately kept out of the loop. They would have supported their
daughter if she had decided to have the baby. But instead, says her mother,
she herself was made to feel 'so useless' as a parent. And indeed, one
of the worst aspects of this whole business is the undermining of parental
responsibility. Although they remain legally responsible for their children's
welfare, parents are seeing their rights taken away and given to their
children instead. This deliberately severs a child from her parents by
telling her, in effect, that she is now grown-up enough to do without them.
-
-
- Behind all of this lies the totalitarian Marxist mindset
and the belief that children are now in truth the property of the State;
and that officialdom knows better than parents how to deal with their children.
Instead of parents providing guidance and support, that role is to be performed
instead by agents of the State. In so doing, they replace parental values
by their own belief system, and move us ever closer to Huxley's vision
of a Brave New World.
-
-
- `To destroy a people, you must first sever their roots.`
Alexander Solzhenitzyn.
-
-
- Measuring Success: How many ardent feminists, I wonder,
will read the above and say, "It was all worth it and there are always
casualties in war." Make no mistake about it, feminism is not about
`women's rights.` It is a war against God, nature, the family and men.
Identicality, not equality, is the goal, and they are more than halfway
there if present Western societies are the gauge by which success in this
war is to be measured.
-
-
- To be `pro choice` on abortion is today almost the defining
mark of the modern woman. Many Feminists regard the phrase `women's liberation`
as meaning liberation from all things traditional, including a woman's
appearance, along with what they see as being the unrewarding and male-imposed
roles of wife and mother. Margaret Sanger, the Feminist `birth mother`
of Planned Parenthood and a virulent eugenicist, wrote before the second
world war that " the most merciful thing a large family can do to
one of its infant members is kill it." Sanger is an icon of Feminism,
and was an open and vocal admirer of Hitler's eugenics program. It is a
recorded fact that the eugenics movement was born in the US and in Great
Britain, long before Hitler grabbed power in Germany, and, following the
end of the war, simply went home again in the shape of the organisation;
Planned Parenthood.
-
-
- The Collapse Of Morality: The above example of the chaos
caused to a young life by the breakdown in the moral order should be reason
enough for the reader to stop and look around his or her self and ask the
question: "How did we come to this point?" They say you can judge
a tree by its fruit. I think it fair to say that the fruits of our new
`humanist` lifestyle are very poisonous.
-
-
- What people consider right and wrong can be more properly
determined by how they live their lives than by what they say they believe.
That being the case, the old Christian moral order appears mortally wounded.
I grew up in a working-class environment back in the sixties and seventies,
when divorce was still to a great extent considered a scandal. Cohabitation
was looked down upon, abortion thought abhorrent and homosexuality deplored.
Today, half of all marriages end in divorce, `relationships` come and go
and, to quote Pat Buchanan, "The love that dare not speak its name
won't shut up."
-
-
- The collapse of marriage and marital fertility appears
to be due to a long-term shift away from Christianity and the values it
affirms, towards a militant and secular individualism focused on the self.
With promiscuity running amok, divorce the norm, the proliferation of pornography
and tax payer-funded abortion on a massive scale, (barely considered newsworthy),
the world predicted by Pope Paul VI in 1968 in his `Humanae Vitae` is upon
us. In his encyclical, the Pope envisioned four consequences of what he
termed the `contraceptive mindset`:
-
-
- 1. Widespread infidelity and a lowering of morality.
-
-
- 2. Women would cease to be man's respected and beloved
companion, and serve only as an instrument of his selfish enjoyment.
-
-
- 3. It would place a dangerous weapon in the hands of
the state, which took no heed of moral exigencies.
-
-
- 4. The treatment of people as mere objects and unborn
children akin to a disease to be prevented, resulting in the dehumanisation
of the species.
-
-
- I think it fair to say, as the sad example given above
depicts very well, that the Pope's vision was close to prophetic. Our society
seems to be progressively stripping out the human-ties of family and parents,
trust and responsibility, authority and dependence, and replacing them
with an impersonal bureaucracy that seeks to regulate, licence and ultimately
control human relationships and what they produce. Throughout history,
the surest defence against state control of our personal lives has been
the family unit. Slice by slice, this is being dismembered and its roots
are being severed.
-
-
- Ref: `The Death Of The West` by Patrick J. Buchanan
-
-
- `The Cruel Hoax` by Henry Makow.
-
-
- http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/archives/vol6no2/DevlinTOQV6N2.pdf
- http://www.heising.dk/content.asp?Id=107
- http://www.savethemales.ca/180302.html
- http://www.henrymakow.com/000185.html
- http://www.henrymakow.com/200202.html
- http://www.savethemales.ca/150801.html
- http://www.henrymakow.com/130103.html
- http://www.gillistriplett.com/rel101/articles/destruction.html
- http://www.overpopulation.org/birthcon.html RU-486 -
The Abortion Pill.
- http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/030406massculling.htm
|