- We have gotten to the point where the disinformation
teams Israel is fielding to heckle 9-11 and Kleptastrophe investigators
are becoming, to an awakening public, yet more proof of Zionist Jew involvement
in both covert-war sabotage atrocities.
-
- So let us swat this fly -- at the same time nailing
once again the conspiracy that sends him to us.
-
- Jack Stone is the typical Israel-can't-be-involved
heckler and chutzpadik fabulator dedicated to full-time service in
tossing verbal stink bombs at galen, Larry Lawson, Peter Wakefield
Sault and other intelligent and informed citizens honestly investigating
the 9-11 crime. Stone writes:
-
- Demolishing the WTC twin towers -- even if it could be
done at all -- would require 44,100 demolition devices all working perfectly
and detonating to split-second perfection without any mis-fires or mistakes.
(The reasons why it could be no less require explanation, but we have already
discussed it previous months.)
-
-
- Dick Eastman reply
-
- (Replies of Mark S. Bilk and Kevin Barret and John Machado
follow -- but here, first, is mine which includes some quotes from Alex James (not
Jones):
-
- And who is the physicsit or engineer who determined that
44,100 devices could be necessary, but 43,900 would not? How is this precision
so credible? How is it his assumptions are accepted without being known?
His assumptions about the strenghts and weaknesses of the building? Of
what various types of thermite might be used and what types of devices
and where applied? And of course there is always the college sophomore
way of doing a job and the most-efficient best way?
-
- How could an airplanes each carrying only a back-yard
9' diameter above-ground swimming pool equivalent quantity of
jet kerosene bring down the two tallest skyscrpaers in New York City and
a third building as well -- if 44,000 termite devices were required to
do the job? (What would 44,000 thermite devices look like in a 9' diameter
3 ft deep pool?)
-
- The videos show that once the building began to pancake
the collapsing floors got ahead (downward) of the core, the collapsing mass
pulling the core after it. We note that molten steel poured from
the floor where the pancaking collapse moments later initiated.
-
- Never trust a man who says couldn't. The thermite charges
were placed -- only thermite could produce the flow of molten metal we
saw -- plus all of the chemical residue and transformation into tiny beads
of metal as reported independently by Dr. Jones and the European physicists.
How many thermite devices were planted. Only one answer can be given
at scientific levels of confidence. That answer is: "Enough."
-
- All of the investigators I endorse, Jones, Bollyn, Honegger,
Valentine, Dewdney, Gage to name a few, present hard evidence and reach
conclusion which taken together tell a consistent story. There are still
matters that I have not looked into -- where charges built into the WTC
also employed or where all devices set later? (see Bilk letter below).
But the picture of the 9-11 conspiracy has been reconstructed -- like
a broken teacup being glued together -- and the pieces fit. The failure
of the "boxcutter" theory that has jet kerosene bringing down
all three New York skyscrapers is also glaringly obvious. The theory of
space based energy beams bringing down each skyscraper has aboslutely no
basis of support and is a transparent disinformation "red herring"
designed to take attention away from Larry Silverstein and the Bush brother
Marvin and his cousin Wirt Walker the 3rd.
-
- You've seen these links from Bollyn already:
-
- Israel's Super-Thermite Lab <http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11310
-
- Bollyn's Solving 9-11 Book - 9 Chapters Now Online http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11157
-
- Recipe for Making Super-Thermite
- http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11255
-
- Who Put Super Thermite in the Towers?
- http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11240
-
- But perhaps you haven't read this from Alex
James -- a perfect example demonstrating the kind of comprehensive
"global consistency" I am talking about:
-
- New evidence, collected by engineer Kevin Ryan, indicates
"fireproofing" installed in the structural core of the
World Trade Center in 1999 was actually a nanothermate spray, which
is a dangerous explosive. See: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2008/070108coincidence.htm
-
- Mr. Silverstein's first order of business as the new
owner was to change the company responsible for the security of the complex.
The new security company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec). George
W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of directors, and Marvin's
cousin, Wirt Walker III, was its CEO. According to public records, not
only did Securacom provide electronic security for the World Trade Center,
it also covered Dulles International Airport and United Airlines - two
key players in the 9/11 attacks.
-
- Lewis Eisenberg, chairman of the New York and New Jersey
Port Authority and head of its security from 1995 to December 2001,
was keen to sell 99 year leases on WTC1, 2, 4, and 5. Larry Silverstein
had already bought the lease on WTC3 (The Marriott Hotel) WTC6 (U.S.
Customs Building) and WTC7 (Solomon Brothers' Building). As the WTC
landlord, the Port Authority wanted to be rid of responsibility for
the building but faced a dilemma:
-
- * The WTC couldn't be demolished because
that would release asbestos fireproofing into the air and create
a major health hazard;
-
- * The cost for removing the asbestos was
prohibitive; and
-
- * Few people wanted to move into a toxic
building.
-
- Selling leases was the only way it could off load responsibility
to someone else. In early 2001, Vornado Realty Trust of Paramus,
N.J., was named the winning holder. On February 21, it entered into
exclusive negotiations with the authority, but by March 26 it could
not finalize its bid. Eisenberg then approached a group led by Silverstein
(Silverstein Properties) and Frank Lowy, the Israeli founder of the
Australian-based Westfield Holdings.
-
- On July 23, 2001, Eisenberg personally finalized
the deal. Silverstein got his deal and Lowy, through his subsidiary
Westfield America, got 425,000 square feet of retail space for $400
million, of which Westfield paid $133 million up front. Overall,
the deal cost $3.2 billion, even though the value of the WTC site
was estimated at $8.2 billion, far below the $5.1 billion estimated
for replacement and maintenance of lost revenue. 36
-
- Why the commission didn't question this fire-sale price
and Silverstein's low coverage is a mystery, especially since the
attack was extremely beneficial to him.
-
- Soon after the towers fell, Silverstein filed lawsuits
with his insurers contending that he was entitled to two payments
of $3.5 billion because each plane constituted a separate attack.
For its part, Swiss Reinsurance, which represents a consortium of
20 insurers, agued that Silverstein was only entitled to a payout
of $3.5 billion.
-
- A partial jury verdict handed down on April 28,
2004, sided with the companies. For all except Swiss Re, which itself
held a majority of 22 percent share of the coverage, the jury decided
that the companies were bound by a form from Silverstein's own insurance
broker, that stipulated that Silverstein could never recover more
than $3.5 billion. That decision was partly overturned on December
6, 2004, when a federal jury ruled the nine insurers who wrote the
policy for US $1.1 billion of the total $3.5 billion, had to pay
double. The companies are appealing.37 Even with the single claim
though, plus an $861 million payout for WTC7, Silverstein has already
made a profit.
-
- Now, with insurance money and funds raised through
taxpayer liberty bonds, Silverstein could start over. According
to New York City historian, Mike Wallace, Silverstein is eager to
provide even more office space even though the supply in New York
City far exceeds demand. Already, a 1,776-ft. "Freedom Tower"
is being built on the WTC site -- "All the designers for the
site were required to include in their plan millions of square feet of
office space, to accommodate him and millions more of shopping space, to
accommodate Westfield America, who had the rights to the old WTC underground
mall and wanted to restore the old status quo as much as possible."38
-
- "Why would terrorists take straight-down collapses
of WTC7 and the Towers, when "toppling-over" falls would
require much less work and would do much more damage in downtown
Manhattan? And where would they obtain the necessary skills and access
to the buildings for a symmetrical implosion anyway? The "symmetry
data" emphasized here [in my paper], along with other data,
provide strong evidence for an inside job."40
-
- Since Silverstein and Eisenberg were the only two people
to benefit directly from "straight-down collapses of WTC7 and
the Towers," could the attack have been, at least in part, something
as mundane as real-estate insurance swindle?
-
- Silverstein and Eisenberg should have also been investigated
because of their political connections. Eisenberg headed Bush's New
Jersey fundraising committee; was recently elected Finance Chairman
of the Republican National Committee; is a director of the Republican
Jewish Coalition; and is a former vice-president of AIPAC.
-
- Silverstein, like Eisenberg, held a top position in the
billion-dollar Zionist charity, the United Jewish Appeal, and each
has strong ties to Israel's leadership, a fact that was demonstrated
shortly after the attack: Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry
Silverstein.a close friend, to ask how he was. Since then, they have
spoken a few more times.
-
- Two former Prime Ministers - Benjamin Netanyahu who this
week called Silverstein a "friend," and Ehud Barak, whom
Silverstein in the past offered a job as his representative in Israel
- also called soon after the disaster.41
-
- sources:
-
- http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/browse_thread/thread/90aa02df99876dc7
-
- http://www.informationliberation.com/index.php?id=15459
-
- In truth I find the critics of solvers of the 9-11 crimes
to be the ones lacking cogent argument or anything else except profanity,
misrepresentation andchutzpah (a Yiddish euphemism for brazen sociopathic
effrontery in the face of totally exposed wrongness-- viewed as an admirable
business and social trait when practiced with success by any Jew
against any gentile.)
-
- Richard "Dick" Eastman M.S., M.A. Yakima, Washington
-
-
- P.S. My investigation of the Pentagon photo evidence
and witness statements offers similarly global consistency in establishing
that Flight 77 was not the cause of the explosions and deaths at the Pentagon.
-
- http://www.rense.com/general86/hight1.htm Highest Treason
Substantiated
-
- independent corroboration -- by credible witnesses,
found and interviewed by indpendent investigators Aldo Marquis and
Craig Ranke, saying exactly what my thesis would predict they would say
given their location -- sustaining the flyover thesis and putting
fresh nails of refutation into the coffin of the "boxcutter"
black-op deception.
-
- The "Citizens Investigation Team" findings
of Ranke and Marquis can be viewed here.
-
- http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html
-
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o
-
- The proof of the validity of Ranke-Marquis-Eastman flyover
thesis is that no mainstream or Fetzer-Group critic dares attack it by
baldly stating its unanswerable findings, or addressing its multiple lines
of conclusive evidence all poining to the same conclusion -- whereas the
claims of the critics, when not attacking straw men, are disproven at every
turn.
-
- The 9-11 conspiracy is proven, Zionist Jews with connections
to Israel and City of London merchant banking are inescapably implicated.
-
-
- On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:03:19PM -0400,
- Jack Stone wrote:
-
- No, no, it was MAGIC FAIRY DUST acquired from Leprechauns
in exchange for a tanker truck of beer. The Leprechauns got the magic fairy
dust from THE GOMBARS, how are interdimensional beings from another galaxy.
(Sorry, I did promise not to tell).
-
- THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH CONSPIRACY NUTS.... When their
theories are exposed as bullshit, they simply CHANGE their story. They
go through a never-ending cycle of different variations on the theme.
-
- But how can there be EVIDENCE "proving" something
THAT KEEPS CHANGING all the time?
-
- If there was any evidence proving theory X, then there
can't be proof of theory Y after the nuts change their story.
-
-
- The conspiracy theory depends on NEVER being specific,
so that the crazy theory cannot be logically examined.
-
-
- On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:00 AM,
- Kevin Barrett kbarrett@merr.com wrote:
-
- It looks like it was done with superthermitic nanocomposites,
which are the most highly explosive substances yet developed, and can be
painted on surfaces and detonated with high-heat charges. Just paint it
on -- looks like any other paint or sealant. Or it could be shaped like
plastique and disguised. Unmistakable traces of the huge amounts of this
stuff have been found in the dust, as Neils Harrit's paper demonstrates.
-
- Anything applied or attached to the core columns would
be invisible to WTC workers, and could have easily been placed by the ongoing
and heavily-guarded "elevator repair" operations in 2001. The
elevator shafts gave access to the core columns.
-
- For one hypothesis about how they might have been applied
and who did it, check out Chris Bollyn's brand new free book at http://www.bollyn.com Or
start with my interview with him: http://noliesradio.org/archives/category/shows/fair-balanced For
a different take on who did it, check out my interview tonight with Richard
Curtis: 5 - 7 pm Central, http://www.americanfreedomradio.com
-
- Kevin
-
-
- The demolition above ground of the WTC was accomplished
with conventional explosives. Dr. Steven Jones agreed with me on
this point on a radio show we were on a couple of months ago.
-
- The explosives were built into the towers when they were
constructed:
-
- http://cosmicpenguin.com/911/#CORES
-
- Please read the material at all of the four links in
that section before raising objections.
-
- Note particularly the section of
-
- http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11corexplosions.html
-
- beginning about half-way down with the paragraph beginning
"The last image is WTC 2" just above this picture that has
a red and a yellow vertical stripe:
-
- http://algoxy.com/psych/images/corefacesexplodinglines.jpg
-
- Presumably the explosive mixture employed additives to
keep it potent for many decades, and had been given thermal
accelerated life testing to assure this.
-
- I have been told about another large building in the
U.S. that has built-in demolition explosives, but have been asked
by the informant not to name it to avoid putting them in danger.
-
- The WTC towers were so strong that demolishing them at
the end of their useful life would have been extremely difficult and expensive
without the built-in explosives, which for legitimate demolition would
presumably have been detonated during a rainstorm to prevent the dust cloud
that occurred on 9/11.
-
- The detonators were installed shortly before 9/11. If
coded radio detonation commands were used, they could have been
issued from a repeater on each floor that had an unobtrusive thin wire
antenna in a window for unobstructed reception. Upon receipt of its coded
command its microprocessor would have issued the individual coded
commands by radio to the detonators on that floor. Custom LSI chips
could have made both types of unit much smaller than a pack of cigarettes.
-
- Alternatively, the detonators could have used very accurate
crystal-clock timers. For safety, there could have been three timers
in each detonator, with majority logic (2 of 3) needed to fire.
-
- Nanothermite is powerful, but not powerful enough for
a painted-on layer to cut through thick steel.
-
- A PBS video shown in 1990, stated that the welders doing
the butt-welds of the high-tensile 3-inch rebars in the concrete core had
to have a security clearance. The documentary showed that the resulting
slowdown of the work increased the cost to the public.
-
- The existence of the built-in explosives was discovered
by Chris Brown from the clues in that video and his research
into the design of the towers. Chris, please make any additions or
corrections that you wish.
-
- Mark S Bilk
- http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911
-
-
- On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:07 AM, John Machado
- mach499@yahoo.com wrote:
-
- As usual, the Stone premise is not correct
-
- with military grade thermate 4,800 locations in each
tower, most of it paint-on or strap-on in less than a minute ... most of
it done in the elevator shafts ... the deed is done ..
-
- controls would be by floor ... and set for successive
floors at less than 1/10 th second intervals .. once the key floor is determined
... by the beacon to which the plane is headed and then the actual strike
point ...
-
- plane strikes would have induced toppling in the real
world if anything ... but, the buildings withstood the impact and the fires
...... if not for the demoliton charges .. pre-rigged ... all the WTC would
still be standing .. which was not the desired end...
-
- 24 men in each tower .. get the job done in 30 hours
... and... lo ... didn't the WTC have a 30 hour shut-down shortly after
Silverstein took over..
-
|
