Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com
 
Why They Hate Us 
By Professor Stephen M. Walt
12-6-9
 
THE PEACE AND JUSTICE FOUNDATION
11006 Veirs Mill Rd, STE L-15, PMB 298
Silver Spring, MD. 20902
 
DHUL HIJJAH 1430 AH Dec. 2, 2009
 
Assalaamu Alaikum (Greetings of Peace):
 
As many of our readers are aware, I've been working on a paper on the Ft. Hood tragedy (off and on) for some time now. My prayer is that this will be an in depth, Islamically-based analysis on what happened and why. While only Almighty ALLAH can ever know with certainty the answer to the question why, I'm hoping to explore, in as objective a way possible, some of the factors that led up to that human explosion on Nov 5, 2009.
 
My examination of this issue goes beyond intellectual curiosity, and/or the knee-jerk reaction that many Muslims experience whenever a tragic occurrence brings unwanted attention on Muslims in America. It has to do with the health and welfare of Muslims in America; and indeed, with the health and welfare of America itself.
 
Like most people reading this introduction to the thought-provoking commentary that follows, I have seen a significant number of Muslim leaders of varying stripes weigh in on this tragedy before a national audience. MOST have delivered dangerously poor representation on this issue.
 
It is with this in mind that I invite the reader to reflect deeply over what Professor Stephen Walt has to say. I believe Walt's analysis factors significantly into why Major Hassan's intellectual output was as it was in the months leading up to this tragedy, and why he ultimately did what he did. (It will also prepare you for my humble analysis which will come later, insha'Allah.)
 
As for the Muslim "leaders," or opinion shaping apologists, who have been doing their best to assure the powers-that-be that there is no problem with Muslims helping to fight America's imperialistic wars, I advise you to reflect even deeper on the painful analysis provided by Professor Walt (below). And then those of you who presume yourselves learned (in the "Islamic Sciences"), check the condition of your heart!
 
El-Hajj Mauri' Saalakhan
______________________
 
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/11/30/why_they_hate_us
 
The New ForeignPolicy.com Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call Why they hate us (II): How many Muslims has the U.S. killed in the past 30 years?
 
 
Mon, 11/30/2009 
 
Tom Friedman had an especially fatuous column in Sunday's New York Times, which is saying something given his well-established capacity for smug self-assurance. According to Friedman, the big challenge we face in the Arab and Islamic world is "the Narrative" -- his patronizing term for Muslim views about America's supposedly negative role in the region.
 
 
If Muslims weren't so irrational, he thinks, they would recognize that "U.S. foreign policy has been largely dedicated to rescuing Muslims or trying to help free them from tyranny." He concedes that we made a few mistakes here and there (such as at Abu Ghraib), but the real problem is all those anti-American fairy tales that Muslims tell each other to avoid taking responsibility for their own actions.
 
 
I heard a different take on this subject at a recent conference on U.S. relations with the Islamic world. In addition to hearing a diverse set of views from different Islamic countries, one of the other participants (a prominent English journalist) put it quite simply. "If the United States wants to improve its image in the Islamic world," he said, "it should stop killing Muslims."
 
 
Now I don't think the issue is quite that simple, but the comment got me thinking: How many Muslims has the United States killed in the past thirty years, and how many Americans have been killed by Muslims? Coming up with a precise answer to this question is probably impossible, but it is also not necessary, because the rough numbers are so clearly lopsided.
 
 
Here's my back-of-the-envelope analysis, based on estimates deliberately chosen to favor the United States. Specifically, I have taken the low estimates of Muslim fatalities, along with much more reliable figures for U.S. deaths.
 
 
To repeat: I have deliberately selected "low-end" estimates for Muslim fatalities, so these figures present the "best case" for the United States. Even so, the United States has killed nearly 30 Muslims for every American lost. The real ratio is probably much higher, and a reasonable upper bound for Muslim fatalities (based mostly on higher estimates of "excess deaths" in Iraq due to the sanctions regime and the post-2003 occupation) is well over one million, equivalent to over 100 Muslim fatalities for every American lost.
 
 
Figures like these should be used with caution, of course, and several obvious caveats apply. To begin with, the United States is not solely responsible for some of those fatalities, most notably in the case of the "excess deaths" attributable to the U.N. sanctions regime against Iraq. Saddam Hussein clearly deserves much of the blame for these "excess deaths," insofar as he could have complied with Security Council resolutions and gotten the sanctions lifted or used the "oil for food" problem properly. Nonetheless, the fact remains that the United States (and the other SC members) knew that keeping the sanctions in place would cause tens of thousands of innocent people to die and we went ahead anyway.
 
 
Similarly, the United States is not solely to blame for the sectarian violence that engulfed Iraq after the 2003 invasion. U.S. forces killed many Iraqis, to be sure, but plenty of Shiites, Kurds, Sunnis, and foreign infiltrators were pulling triggers and planting bombs too. Yet it is still the case that the United States invaded a country that had not attacked us, dismantled its regime, and took hardly any precautions to prevent the (predictable) outbreak of violence. Having uncapped the volcano, we are hardly blameless, and that goes for pundits like Friedman who enthusiastically endorsed the original invasion.
 
 
Third, the fact that people died as a result of certain U.S. actions does not by itself mean that those policy decisions were wrong. I'm a realist, and I accept the unfortunate fact that international politics is a rough business and sometimes innocent people die as a result of actions that may in fact be justifiable. For example, I don't think it was wrong to expel Iraq from Kuwait in 1991 or to topple the Taliban in 2001. Nor do I think it was wrong to try to catch Bin Laden -- even though people died in the attempt -- and I would support similar efforts to capture him today even if it placed more people at risk. In other words, a full assessment of U.S. policy would have to weigh these regrettable costs against the alleged benefits to the United States itself or the international community as a whole.
 
 
Yet if you really want to know "why they hate us," the numbers presented above cannot be ignored. Even if we view these figures with skepticism and discount the numbers a lot, the fact remains that the United States has killed a very large number of Arab or Muslim individuals over the past three decades. Even though we had just cause and the right intentions in some cases (as in the first Gulf War), our actions were indefensible (maybe even criminal) in others.
 
 
It is also striking to observe that virtually all of the Muslim deaths were the direct or indirect consequence of official U.S. government policy. By contrast, most of the Americans killed by Muslims were the victims of non-state terrorist groups such as al Qaeda or the insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan. Americans should also bear in mind that the figures reported above omit the Arabs and Muslims killed by Israel in Lebanon, Gaza, and the West Bank. Given our generous and unconditional support for Israel's policy towards the Arab world in general and the Palestinians in particular, Muslims rightly hold us partly responsible for those victims, too.
 
 
Contrary to what Friedman thinks, our real problem isn't a fictitious Muslim "narrative" about America's role in the region; it is mostly the actual things we have been doing in recent years. To say that in no way justifies anti-American terrorism or absolves other societies of responsibility for their own mistakes or misdeeds. But the self-righteousness on display in Friedman's op-ed isn't just simplistic; it is actively harmful. Why? Because whitewashing our own misconduct makes it harder for Americans to figure out why their country is so unpopular and makes us less likely to consider different (and more effective) approaches.
 
 
Some degree of anti-Americanism may reflect ideology, distorted history, or a foreign government's attempt to shift blame onto others (a practice that all governments indulge in), but a lot of it is the inevitable result of policies that the American people have supported in the past.
 
 
When you kill tens of thousands of people in other countries -- and sometimes for no good reason -- you shouldn't be surprised when people in those countries are enraged by this behavior and interested in revenge. After all, how did we react after September 11?
 
Stephen M. Walt is the Robert and Renée Belfer Professor of International Relations at Harvard University.
 
 
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros