- FALSE STATEMENT ISSUED
-
- From Clifford E Carnicom
http://www.carnicom.com/minnis1.htm
3-8-01
-
- A statement by a Mr. Patrick Minnus follows at the end
of this page.
-
- Let it be known for the record that:
-
- Any statements, implications, or insinuations made by
any individuals, including a Mr. Patrick Minnis, that I have received monetary
compensation for personal gain for participation in any video documentary
projects are PATENTLY FALSE and are herein refuted. Monetary compensation
for personal gain is excluded as a factor in any research that I have conducted,
am conducting, or will continue to conduct on the aerosol operations that
are occurring without informed consent."
-
- Those that wish to research this issue may wish to contact
the publisher of any video or informational sources that are referred to.
In addition, let it be known that I specifically did request that a written
statement of non-compensation be included within the recent documentary
that is most likely being referred to. I have not produced any videos to
date, but I have contributed information to various sources for the public
welfare.
-
- Clifford E Carnicom Mar 08 2001
-
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- The following is an excerpt from a recent relayed posting
on the Jeff Rense internet site (rense.com). The link to this page is entitled
"Nasa Scientist Quoted in USA Today Talks About Chemtrails".
-
-
- "Date 2-28-01
- From: Patrick Minnis <p.minnis@larc.nasa.gov
- Subject: Jet aerosol spraying
- CC: g.g.gibson@larc.nasa.gov
-
- Dear xxx,
-
- Your email, copied below, was forwarded to me because
I conduct research on contrails. I am sorry to see that you have been misinformed
about the nature of contrails. Unfortunately, there is an ample supply
of people who are ready to spread rumors and propaganda to upset people
simply to draw attention to themselves or to make a buck (e.g., Carnicom
video). Because the origin of the secret plots promoted by these people
is the government, it is automatically impossible for anyone from the government
to refute the accusations."
-
- -----
-
-
-
- Note - The following two inquiries and responses were
sent in from a concerned citizen who wishes to remain anonymous. The responding
scientist, Dr. Patrick Minnis, is quoted in the USA Today story about Chemtrails
also posted in Headlines.
-
- 3-7-1
-
- First letter to NASA and response from Dr. Patrick Minnis
who works at NASA Langley Research Center.
-
- (Note - the letter was originally sent to 'Mr. Gibson'
and was forwarded to Dr. Minnis whose response follows below...)
-
- From xxxx 2-28-01
-
- Dear Mr. Gibson,
-
- I am wondering how the American people can get any truthful
information about the obviously classified aerial operations going on above
our heads.
-
- I have been observing this distressing phenomonon for
3/4 of a year now. It is pretty straight forward that the emissions from
these mostly military aircraft are not just ice crystals and the planes
that are emitting these substances are not flying regular aircraft routes.
At this moment there are jets outside my house systematically working at
hazing over the whole sky. This seems to happen alot before a front passes
through. Whether this has to do with weather modification, biological neutalization,
HAARP, solar shielding or other more sinister plots, oh yes, lets not forget
some sort of missile defense, is what we are trying to find out. When the
outdoor reflective conditions are just right, heavy fallout of different
types can be observed, including highly charged metallic looking particles.
Asthma and other illness are on the sharp increase.
-
- I feel the American people deserve answers. I realize
certain information must remain classified for national security and hopefully
it's national security we are talking about. I guess I really don't expect
the whole answer but am hoping for at least some sort of hint or guidance
that could direct our laymen's research. There has to be better ways to
approach whatever this aerial operation is supposed to remedy. I sincerely
hope I will hear back from you and would look forward to any input you
could offer.
-
- Respectfully, John Smith _____
-
- Date 2-28-01 From: Patrick Minnis <p.minnis@larc.nasa.gov
Subject: Jet aerosol spraying CC: g.g.gibson@larc.nasa.gov
-
- Dear xxx,
-
- Your email, copied below, was forwarded to me because
I conduct research on contrails. I am sorry to see that you have been misinformed
about the nature of contrails. Unfortunately, there is an ample supply
of people who are ready to spread rumors and propaganda to upset people
simply to draw attention to themselves or to make a buck (e.g., Carnicom
video). Because the origin of the secret plots promoted by these people
is the government, it is automatically impossible for anyone from the government
to refute the accusations.
-
- If I refute the notion that the government is spraying
people, then I will be accused of lying and covering up. If I agreed to
the idea of spraying, then I would be saying what you want to hear, but
I really would be lying and would have to make up something. It would sure
be exciting if there was something sinister about contrails. But, it really
is just not very exciting, just a meteorological phenomenon. Then again,
I find the study of these human-clouds very interesting.
-
- Truth is, contrails form from the exhaust of high-altitude
aircraft, commercial and military, whenever they fly into air that has
the proper humidity and temperatures. The mixing of the hot moist exhaust
with the cold air cases the formation of ice crystals that will either
grow or sublime (evaporate). Sometimes, they will make short, short-lived
contrails. Sometimes they will make long, long-lived contrails that spread
out and cover the sky. It all depends on the meteorological conditions
at the flight altitude. The reason you see the heavy duty contrails most
often prior to a frontal passage is that the air ahead of a cold front
is rising and is moist. Rising cools the air and increases the relative
humidity. The higher the relative humidity, the more likely you will see
spreading contrails. Often these spreading contrails ahead of a front are
followed by cirrus clouds generated naturally without the extra oomph provided
by aircraft exhaust.
-
- Ait traffic is increasing, so contrails are increasing.
Because contrails are increasing, cirrus cloud cover is increasing. Thus,
it could be said that air traffic is modifying the weather. However, the
modification is not planned, nor is it desired. It is an artifact of the
technology, just like air pollution in the city occurs because of the autombile
exhaust.
-
- For more information, I would recommend that you check
out my web site, www-pm.larc.nasa.gov, click on SASS.
-
- If you need any copies of the article listed in the references,
let me know.
-
- Sincerely, Patrick Minnis
-
- Dr. Patrick Minnis MS 420 NASA Langley Research Center
Hampton, VA 23681-0001
-
- 757-864-5671 fax: 757-864-7996 p.minnis@larc.nasa.gov
http://www-pm.larc.nasa.gov/pages/minnis_home.html
-
-
- ***************
-
- Second letter to and response from Dr. Minnis
-
- From xxxx 3-2-01
-
- Dear Dr. Minnis,
-
- I want to thank you for taking the time to answer my
e-mail. Some of what you said makes sense to me however there are still
many questions. Obviously you have a much more extensive knowledge of atmospheric
conditions than I do.
-
- Either the components of our atmosphere have changed
drastically in the past couple of years or the fuel mixture of some jets
has been altered. Granted, air traffic has increased and this can account
for the large number of trails. However my observations are more centered
on the characteristics of the contrails and the manner in which they are
laid down. Many of these "contrails" have a very specifically
different texture, quality and brightness than the old fashioned contrails.
I have taken some truely bizarre photos which will be presented at a scientific
conference in Toronto in March.
-
- Can you tell me anything about titanium dioxide?
-
- I have come across a patent for Powder Contrail Generation
that appears to have been issued to the Secretary of The Navy back in 1974.
This patent describes the apparatus used to disperse light scattering pigment
powder particles in a manner that would prevent them from clumping together.
Here are a few excerpts Pat. no. us3899144
-
- CLAIM:
-
- 1. Contrail generation having maximum radiation scattering
ability for a given weight material.
-
- 9. The method of producing a light scattering contrail
comprising.
-
- a. surface treating light scattering powder particles
to minimize interparticle cohesive forces.
-
- b. deagglomerating said powder particles in two stages
prior to dispensing into a jet tube by subjecting said powder particles
to a hammering action in the first stage to aerate and precondition the
powder, and by passing said powder through a jet mill in the second stage
to further deagglomerate the powder.
-
- c. dispensing the deagglomerated powder from the jet
mill directly into a jet tube for exhausting said powder into the atmosphere
thus forming a contrail.
-
- The present invention is also suitable for use in other
aircraft vehicles to generate contrails for any desired purpose.
-
- Titanium dioxide pigment was selected as the primary
light scattering material because of it's highly efficient light scattering
ability and commercially available pigment grades.
-
- Other type powder compositions can also be used with
the apparatus described herein. For example, various powder particles which
reflect electromagnetic radiation can be dispensed as a chaff or the like
from the contrail generator.
-
- Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present
invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. It is therefore
to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention
may be practiced otherwise than specifically described."
-
- If this technology was available in1974, I can only imagine
what is now available.
-
- There are also patents for scattering aluminum particles
into the atmosphere for the purpose of solar shielding. If contrails are
an increasing cause of global warming, as you say, then it would make sense
that to counteract this they could be spraying aluminum particles or other
reflective elements to direct the radiation back out of the environment.
I believe the goal at one point was to reduce this problem by at least
1%.
-
- Do you think the reflective and at times highly charged
particles I am seeing in the atmosphere can be attributed to the above
or could what I'm seeing be connected with metallic particles produced
from jet fuel combustion?
-
- I spoke to Lisa Chang (jet exhaust researcher) whom you
may know, and she suggested that somehow we collect samples of the fallout
we're seeing. She said that in order for them to investigate, the samples
would have to be collected first. I would think that this would be their
job. If she has any clue as to what I'm seeing, she would know that we
would have to have access to very expensive high tech equipment. To begin
with some of the particles we are talking about are submicron in size and
also this particulate matter can only be observed under highly specific
reflective conditions. Once the fallout passes through this zone, it is
invisible to the naked eye.
-
- I have spoken to several commercial airline and recreational
pilots. A couple of them assured me that what they were observing was not
normal aircraft activity.
-
- I have also spoken with a retired military official and
showed him some info about TARFOX. His reply was "I see the good ole
boys are still at it." and he proceeded to tell me all about aircraft
shielding.
-
- So, I am sure there are still some normal contrails left
somewhere but it cannot be said that all the ones we are seeing are just
composed of ice crystals. If anything there has to be experimentation going
on and it would be ludicrous to deny an absolute absence of that. Even
on the news the other night they were beginning to admit work with weather
modification. That aspect is almost a given fact.
-
- I don't know how much information you are privy to but
it would seem impossible for you to be aware of every classified operation.
I am not trying to be antagonistic but I feel and I want to convey to you
that people have very legitimate reasons for being suspicious. We are seeing
very different patterns of jet activity than a few years back and as I
mentioned before, the texture, quality, brightness and dispersion of the
trails are also very different from what has been observed in the past.
-
- Many of us do remember, we don't all have Alzheimer's
yet, despite the fact that aluminum, in quite a few rainwater samples has
been found to be 7 times the accepted limit.
-
- I want to thank you again for responding and I appreciate
the opportunity to talk this over with you. I'm impressed that time is
taken to explain things to the common person. If you have any more thoughts
on the subject I would enjoy hearing from you.
-
- Sincerely, xxxx _____
-
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 To: xxxx From: Patrick Minnis <p.minnis@larc.nasa.gov
Subject: Jet Aerosol Spraying
-
- Dear xxxx,
-
- Thanks for your courteous and rational letter. I have
had plenty that were not.
-
- I understand your concerns about the increase in contrails
and why you may be skeptical that they are not "regular" contrails.
-
- I will be the first to admit that I do not know everything
about every government program, especially those conducted by the Air Force.
I am well aware, however, of the cost, manpower, and complexity involved
in conducting even a small-scale experiment in the upper troposphere where
jet aircraft usually cruise.
-
- I am also aware that the Air Force is extremely interested
in protecting their aircraft and have long sought methods for shielding
them from detection or tracking by missile systems designed to knock them
out of the skies. Most of those efforts have been to produce short-term,
immediate protection like chaff.
-
- Obviously, development requires testing of various materials
and there are probably numerous other materials that have been examined
for such purposes. I believe aluminum foil flakes have been established
as one of the primary chaff types. Titanium dioxide has long been used
as the pigment of choice for making white paint because of its light scattering
properties as noted below. However, because of the weight constraints on
airplanes and the type of dispersal patterns, I would suspect that foil
flakes would be preferable. However, I don't know if TiO2 or any other
chemical types are used for chaff. But remmeber, chaff is designed for
protection from an immediate threat. It would not make any sense to be
spraying it for anything other than a short burst during training exercises
or real combat. Therefore, I would have to rule out the chaff aspect.
-
- I would also rule out the climate modifcation aspect.
The effort would be too expensive, require too much manpower and equipment
and probably would not work. Large, climate-changing programs have been
hypothesized and written about for years, but inevitably they are pie in
the sky. Maybe pies in the sky would change climate. Man's efforts to affect
the weather are typically unplanned, like air pollution, city heat islands,
contrails, etc. Weather modification is something that people have been
trying for years with mixed success. It will continue to go on. But at
the scale that would be associated with climate change? I doubt very seriously.
-
- By the way, TARFOX was an experiment designed to study
atmospheric aerosols. It was conducted off the east coast durign the summer
so that they woul dbe sure to get lots of nasty aerosols coming off the
continent. The "good ole boys" were just a bunch of NOAA, NASA,
University, and foreign scientists interested in various aspects of measuring
aerosols and their effects.
-
- The reasons that you are seeing more contrails and more
bizarre-looking contrails now than before are many. Primarily, I believe
that awareness of contrails is the biggest factor. Honestly, how closely
did you or anyone else look at the skies before being made aware of "chemtrails"?
I have been studying clouds for 25 years and did not really become aware
of the vast variety of contrail shapes, spreadings, colors, etc. until
I heard there was going to be a NASA-sponsored study of them bac in 1993.
Then, I started looking in the skies with an eye for contrails, and lo
and behold, there is a lot of wierd-looking stuff going on. But that wierd
stuff is simply nature taking its course after the aircraft exhaust mixes
with the ambient air.
-
- The process of contrail formation is lot like a snowflake.
The course of a contrail's existence is uniquely determined by humidity,
temperature, winds, and nucleation (in the case of contrails: aircraft
type, engine type, fuel, acceleration, and state of the engine). Thus,
an incredible array contrails can and does form. There is really no such
thing as an old-fashioned contrail. They have been doing this stuff all
along but were not noticed. Another factor is the increase in air traffic.
Have a look at the flight frequencies plotted on my web page. There are
a lot of planes out there.
-
- Another factor causing more contrails is an increase
in jet engine efficiency. More of the engine energy is being converted
to thrust, so there is less heat in the exhaust making contrail formation
easier (a cooler mix, sam e amount of water vapor). Thus, contrails are
forming more frequently even without an increase in planes.
-
- I went on a bit long here and need to return to my work.
I spend far too much time answering emails like these and not documenting
my results in papers. But keeping the public informed is part of what the
taxpayers expect for their money and I don't mind doing it.
-
- I hope I have answered some of your concerns.
-
- Sincerely, PM
-
- ***************
-
- Third letter to and response from Dr. Minnis
-
- From xxxx 3-2-01
-
- Dear Dr. Minnis,
-
- You are right, aircraft shielding would be a short term
manuever and wouldn't account for what we are seeing. I guess i mentioned
that aspect because of the following. I had spoken to a Major Bigelow (Air
National Guard) who had informed me that he had been an airforce pilot
and assured me that" the airforce doesn't spray ( then he hesitated
and said they don't spray anything", which I know is an untruth because
the airforce does spray different substances for varied purposes.
-
- I'm going to give you more credit than I think you give
to yourself. As you have mentioned you have been studying clouds 25 years
prior to the 1993 NASA study. I would place a bet on it that if the "unusual"
contrails had been around before that , you would have noticed them. The
obvious contrails we are talking about are not hiding in some other dimension
until you are alerted to observe them. It seems to me that, again, if you
have been observing the sky so closely , with a scientific eye, for 25
years prior to this NASA study and only noticed the bizarre trails when
they basically told you to look for them, then to me this raises a bright
red flag.
-
- It does seem that climate engineering would be a very
expensive operation but according to The National Center for Policy Analysis
" deliberately introducing fine particles into the atmosphere in order
to scatter sunlight and heat back into space, it would cost as much as
1 billion a year or just 100 million if technology advanced options were
employed that would be between 0.1% and 1% of the 100 billion a year it
is estimated would be required to price ration fossil fuel usage down to
the 1990 levels in the United States alone.
-
- The Global Change Research Coordination Office has been
promoting geoengineering for 3 decades. Teller and his colleagues presented
their proposal for geoengineering at the 22ond International Seminar on
Planetary Emergencies in Aug. 1997". It was around this time or shortly
after that the public began noticing the contrail phenomonon on such a
massive scale.
-
- The Global Climate Change Digest- Aug. 1996 - "The
Economic Diplomacy of Geoengineering" - "Geoengineering projects
can probably be accomplished by exo-national programs, not depending on
the behavior of populations, not requiring national regulations or incentives
and not depending on universal participation. It will involve merely deciding
what to do, how much to do and who is to pay for it."
-
- This past fall I went on a trip to Costa Rica. I thought
it was very interesting that despite all the air traffic, there was not
1 contrail to be seen the whole 10 days I was there. The clouds seemed
normal size, texture and shape and it turned out to be truely a vacation
in more ways than one. :=) Only certain countries seem to be reporting
the unusual contrails. I would be interested in hearing your observations
in relation to this aspect.
-
- One of the points you brought up made sense to me and
was very interesting. It gives me something to think about and that was
the fact that the efficiency of the jet engine has increased and as a result
there is less heat in the exhaust which makes it easier for contrails to
form. My husband tests jet engines and may know something about this.
-
- I'm really not writing you for sparring purposes but
I really feel that sharing ideas and other perspectives gives any of us
a broader outlook on certain situations. Even though I am not a scientist,
I have had certain experiences and am working with certain institutions
which help give me insight and enable me to see how some of the puzzle
pieces fit together. I am not claiming to have answers but in order to
get answers we all have to challenge our preconcieved ideas of reality.
I think one of society's problems is that everyone is too specialized and
as a result we really only see a small piece of the puzzle. This is very
evident in the medical community and through personal situations I have
experienced the problems and politics in this area. This in turn has led
me to observe similar deception in other areas.
-
- Over the past year an anonymous team of organized professionals
from scientific, military and security backgrounds, have been researching
these aircraft emissions and their possible applications. From the information
they've gathered, some of the emissions appear to be composed of a base
barium salt mixture. Several types of experimental polymer fibers have
been repeatedly found subsequent to observed aerosol discharge. DARPA documents
describe research into electroactive polmer fibers. This may have something
to do with the electrically charged particles I am seeing. It is thought
that the combination of these airborne particles is contributing to the
very sharp increase rate of asthma and other respiratory illnesses.
-
- Through the study of military and scientific documents
this investigative team has come up with several apparent applications
of the barium salts and polymer fibers. These applications include (a).
aircraft cloaking when irradiated. (b) Advanced radar applications (c)
Biological applications - delivery, decontamination and detection. (d)
communications applications (e) Military weather modification (f) other
applications including VTRPE propagation.
-
- There seems to be military projects and experiments going
on at every level of the atmosphere and therefore it is very difficult
to separate out what is causing what. This amy also explain why 1 explanation
doesn't seem to fit what we are seeing.
-
- In closing, I just want to say that there is a deliberate
and systematic manner in which the mostly military jets haze over the sky.
When apparently finished whiting out the sky in a specific area with trails
that are formed basically at the same time ( this can be determined by
the width of each trail) they move on to the next patch of blue sky. After
the whole sky is complete( which sometimes only takes a short while), blue
patches will appear during the day.
-
- More jets will reinforce these areas. Complete cloud
or haze cover is often the obvious goal. There are usually no military
air shows going on so there would be no reason for the vast amount of military
jet activity in each concentrated area.
-
- I appreciate your comment that my last letter was rational.
I have had chronic neurologic Lyme Disease for the past 10 years which
has affected my cognitive and organizational abilities. I have to work
very hard at writing so that I am understood.
-
- You seem like a very reasonable person and I hope you
will continue to keep an open mind. The information I've presented is not
proof of anything but I feel there is enough evidence out there that should
cause us all to take a deeper look into this issue. We also need more accountability
from some of these unelected Global Think Tanks and the UN which may be
the main forces behind these operations. I visited your website briefly
but want to go back when I have more time to look it over well. I am very
grateful for you correspondence.
-
- Thank you again, xxxxx _____
-
-
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 From: Patrick Minnis <p.minnis@larc.nasa.gov
Subject: Jet aerosol spraying
-
- Dear xxxx,
-
- Thanks for your thoughtful and interesting email.
-
- I do try to keep an open mind, but then again, I have
a lot of trouble with the notion of the observed trails being the result
of spraying for climate purposes or for imbuing the populace with some
sort of toxin/vaccine/microchip/etc.
-
- Because of my experience with meteorology, I am continuously
baffled by the complexity of our atmosphere and of man's attempts to conciously
alter it successfully for a particular goal. As I think I mentioned in
the last email, the theories such as those you mention below (Teller) are
still pie in the sky.
-
- The best way to get a scattering effect that wil do anything
is to load up the stratosphere with submicron sized particles. To accomplish
anything noticeable in terms of a climate effect you would have to loft
material equivalent in weight/particle number to that injected by a volcano
of the magnitude of El Chichon or greater, more like Pinatubo in size.
-
- That would mean the planes would have to deposit 20,000,000
tons of material in the stratosphere every 2 or 3 years. To keep it up
there, it would be best to place it in the Tropics meaning they would have
to reach altitudes of 55,000 to 60,000 ft. To match the Pinatubo output,
this means for the miltary's C-141B Starlifter with a capacity of 34.3
tons, it would require only 20,000,000 / 34.3 = 582,030 flights in the
course of say, 3 years or roughly 195,000 flights each year or 531/day
just to go up and spray a bunch of junk into the stratosphere. How much
fuel do you think that would require?
-
- If the military had 747s, then the number would drop
by a third. But here is the problem. The volcanos put the material at altitudes
above 60,000 ft. There are very few planes that can reach those altitudes
and cargo planes are not included in that bunch. Most of them fly below
45,000 ft.
-
- They could only reach the stratosphere in polar regions
and over the US during the winter.
-
- As far as the apparent start of contrail spreading during
1993 and the public awareness after 1997. AS evidenced by the large numbre
of people who upon being told to look at the sky and notice contrails finally
notice them, I have put myself in that same category. I have not been researching
the details of the clouds but rather have been using relatively low-resolution
geostationary satellite data that make it difficult to track contrails.
And believe me, if you don't have some otion of what you are looking for
in satellite imagery, you won't see it.
-
- Watching the History Channel last night reminded me once
again how long the "megasprayer" has been around. Even the bombers
during WW-II produced massive spreading contrails. No, spreading contrails
have been around a long time.
-
- I believe the heightened public awareness was set off
by the SUCCESS experiemnt which was conducted during 1996. It received
a lot of press coverage, especially my study of spreading contrails that
demonstrated for the first time just how easily contrails spread into cirrus
clouds. It was covered by a variety of environmentalist type magazines,
NPR, NBC, CNN, USA Today, and a number of other newspapers. That type of
coverage will get the attention of a few people who will try to verify
for themselves what is going on. We were able to track contrails then because
the new geostationary satellites have much higher resolution than earlier
ones. Then we were able to develp a predictive model for determining when
they will spread and when they won't. We are currently tesing it. Teller
had nothing to do with public awareness of contrails.
-
- Why do you not see contrails in Costa Rica? First, air
traffic over Costa Ria is relatively light. Second, and more important,
the conditions for contrail formation are generally too high for most commercial
air traffic (the old tropics vs polar effect). Temperatures at flight altitudes
in the US are usaully low enough during the fall, winter, and spring but
much less frequently dutring the summer. That is why we have a dramatic
decrease in contrails during the summer. In the tropics the temperatures
at flight altitudes are like our summer (southern US anyway), so we do
not see too many contrails in places like Costa Rica.
-
- I agree that we are all very specialized and cannot see
the big picture. I am not convinced that anyone really has a good sense
of the big picture. Perhaps, the Air Force is conducting some tests likeyou
have suggested. evenso, they don't have the bucks to do anything on a massive
scale unless it is to fight a war.
-
- Thanks for the thoughts. Pat M
-
- Comment
-
- From Robert Johnson 3-8-1
-
-
- The two recent articles attempting to explain away CHEMTRAILS
is a crock of nervous sh*t. I have been watching high and hard for more
than fifteen years and I've noticed the evolution...a contrail is a contrail
and a chemtrail is SICK. Any observant idiot can tell the difference between
WHITE ...and, say, BROWN, PINK, OILY looking..POWDEROUS, completely DENSE...and
lets not forget...way to low to be 30,000,40,000 foot high formations...REAL
clouds are now a rare event.
-
- There are jets ridiculously circling cities spewing a
trail or cutting off trails to just do immediate U-turns. I have heard
the local weather men LIE about much of what is going on, attempting to
cull the daffy public eye. According to Glen Burns in Atlanta(in 1993,BTW,
on a day when a sunbow was quartered by three HOT sun dogs)...he said "Sun
dogs are a rare event. They only happen once in every five hundred years
or so"...give me a break! And what about the dance they do in front
of RADAR LOOPS, that I KNOW contain ANOMALIES, to block the viewer...Better
yet..what about all the new graphics on the weather maps that EMULATE radar
anomalies...how dumb do they think we are?
-
|