- Let's face itthe only reason we are allowed (not
to mention willing) to talk about it these days is because it begins with
the letter 'z' and not the letter 'j'. That is the single barrier demarcating
the two itemsa simple issue of letters and pronunciation, despite
the fact that they are basically the same animal. Stay within that safe
'z' zone and all will be relatively fine. You will be championed as a friend
of humanity and a warrior for the truth. Venture into that other area though
and bring up that dreaded 'j' word and suddenly the same 'open-minded'
people who a moment before were erecting a monument in your honor start
to loosen their collars and clear their throats uncomfortably.
-
- 'Apples and oranges' they say, or, as one apologist-minded
writer on the internet once put it, 'apples and rocks' Two entirely different
creaturesOne the lion and the other the lambblack and whitegood and evillove
and hatred
-
- Oh, if only it were as simple as that. If only we could
take things at face value and not have to go any deeper. If only the bad
guys could 'play fair' as it were and dress in black all the time while
the good guys dressed in whiteWhat a wonderful world, as the old song goes.
-
- Unfortunately though it is not as simple as that. Unfortunately
the bad guys are a lot smarter than they are given credit for being and
know that victory is much easier achieved by deceiving their opponents
than by fighting them on a level playing field. They have no place in their
vocabulary for words like 'fair', 'honesty' or 'justice'. As far as they
are concerned, there is only one rule that applies when playing the game
and that is to win at any cost.
-
- And so with these things in mind, let's not spend too
much time celebrating this non-existent victory for free speech and intellectual
liberty. Nor should we be strutting around like some kid who thinks he
just scared off the schoolyard bully when in truth Bruiser just had better
things to do that day besides beating him up. As seemingly bold and brash
as we may envision ourselves being these days for daring to speak unfavorably
about the same 'z' word that has been kept sacrosanct for some 50 years,
the truth is that doing such nowadays does not carry the same kind of penalties
that it used to. What used to be a capital offense has now been downgraded
to a class b misdemeanor. Now it is like taunting a lion that is safely
behind metal barsit may snarl a bit, swipe its paws here and there,
but in truth there is no real danger associated with it.
-
- Nor should we get too enthusiastic about how it at least
appears as if the rules of debate are relaxing. The other side is not as
frightened as they may appear to be. We don't have them 'running scared'
as much as we might like to think, and we can dismiss the idea that they
are 'coming around' to our way of thinking. They are just as haughty, just
as heartless, just as arrogant and unconcerned with others' well-being
as were their murderous forefathers once called 'children of the Devil'
by one well-known man from Nazareth.
-
- No, the truth is that we are allowed to discuss the 'z'
word because doing such poses no real danger to the overall agenda. As
much as there are those who hate to hear it, the fact is that our being
allowed to notch up the rhetoric to the next level is a feint and a maneuver
on that part of our enemies. It is the sacrificing of some important piece
in a chess game so that the King can escape from what is an assured checkmate.
It is a way of releasing steam so that the kettle does not blow and a controlled
demolition of sortsvery dramatic in its appearance but which has completely
predictable results in the end, not the least of which is that the risk
of damage to surrounding real estate is minimized. Them permitting us to
speak somewhat openly about the 'z' word is part of this thing known as
'preventative maintenance' and not unlike what takes place every few years
when members of an unhappy electorate decide they are 'mad as hell and
won't take anymore' and who then replace one corrupt politician with his
twin. It is a fixed race, and no matter who comes out on top, 'they' come
out on top, a case of Heads, we win, tails you lose.
-
- So for now, let's just put away the champagne and party
hats. It ain't over yet folks, nowhere's near to being over, and as much
as we would all love to declare victory and go home, doing so would be
an unprecedented disaster
-
- Remember, no one ever killed a snake by cutting off its
tail.
-
- I must admit though that it is a very tempting proposition,
the business of simply stopping at the one and of going no further. After
all, it's not as if the one with the 'z' in the first part of its namemeaning
Zionismhasn't given us plenty to talk about for the next umpteen number
of centuries. As far as evil goes, it certainly suffices as a real-life,
genuine, fire-breathing dragon. The images it has brought before humanity
to consider have certainly been extreme enough to generate ample discussiontanksbombsinnocent
children with their brains or guts blown out all over the placeParents
wearing a mask of sheer agony as they embrace the remains of what was a
son or daughter given to them as a gift from Godthe snide, callous remarks
of those who perpetrated these crimes and who snicker without remorse and
say in effect 'Big dealWho gives a shit?'
-
- And so, I can understand why there are those who do not
see any reason in going further in this discussion. I understand their
reticence. I understand their reasons for asking in effect 'Isn't the one
enough? Isn't it satisfactory to simply say that what has been taking place
with regards to this little experiment in methodical terrorism known as
the state of Israel is bad? Don't the visible effects of it suffice in
our understanding of what the bigger picture is?'
-
- Unfortunately, the problem is that (as well-intentioned
as individuals may be with such statements) the answer is a definitive
'No, it is not enough'. It certainly is a good start, but in reality that
is all that it isa start. Remember, anything can be started. What
counts is whether or not something gets finished as well as how it gets
finished. It's like a person acknowledging that he or she has a serious
weight problem and who says with a voice seemingly full of conviction 'I've
got to get this thing under control' while reaching into the cupboard for
another box of Twinkies. Talk is cheap, as the saying goes.
-
- Therefore, with regards to the current goings on in the
Middle East (and in particular Israel) it is easy to say such things about
Zionism these days. They are obvious. The cold, hard realities of what
is taking place in the land that was once called home by Jesus of Nazareth
are right in our faces and not as easy to ignore as they were in years
past. Now the 'elephant in the room' that was cute when it was a baby has
grown to maturity and is not as cuddly. Now it is dangerous and quite mad
and impossible to tame. What began as a fight between 2 relatively small
entities has now dragged a billion Muslims and a billion Christians into
its orbit, and it hasn't really even begun yet.
-
- And so, making statements depicting what is the organic
ugliness of Zionism is tantamount to saying 'Lung cancer is a bad thing'
but then going no further. Of course Zionism (and more importantly, its
physical evidence) is ugly. This is a no-brainer and something that all
of us in the Christian West should have figured out 50 years ago when the
innocent victims of this vicious animal came forth bringing vivid descriptions
of what they had experienced first-hand. One would have to do some serious
mental and moral summersaults to avoid arriving at the conclusion that
Zionism is bad thing. And just in case we suffered from a certain sense
of unwarranted skepticism when it came to listening to their stories, then
some of the utterances slithering forth from the mouths of the Zionist
leaders themselves should have removed any lingering doubts. Describing
Arabswhether Christian or Muslim as 'cockroaches' and 'beasts
walking on two legs' and in general reducing Zionism's would-be victims
to some level of sub-humanity should have been an indication to the rest
of the world that this whole business was not something rooted in anything
good or humanitarian.
-
- The reason why condemning only Zionism (and then stopping
short of going any further) is not enough is thatas hideous as it
is and as much as it may be directly related to the problems the world
is facing todayin truth Zionism is only a by-product of something
else. Yes, that's right folks, as ugly as it is, it has an even uglier
side to it, hard-to-believe as that may be. If Zionism is Godzilla, then
imagine Godzilla on steroids and in a really bad mood from a splitting
headache. Zionism is a side-effect. It is not the action but rather the
reaction. Not the tree, but rather the fruit that the tree produces. Contrary
to what the gatekeepers would like us to believe, Zionism did not spring
forth out of nowhere. It was not just some ideological pimple that erupted
without warning. It, like all cancers, has a cause, and a very definite,
easily-definable one at that and which has been around for quite some time.
-
- And this is where things get hairy and people start to
get uncomfortable. You see, criticizing Zionism is safe these days (relative
to previous times) because it appears to be merely political, and by definition
that makes it fair game for examination and criticism. These days, given
the fact that the 'war to end all wars' is in full swing and not as easy
to spin as other wars have been in previous times, Zionism has fallen into
that category of other 'isms' that are political in nature and that have
been used as punching bags for many years. Now it is almost as fashionable
to condemn Zionism as it has been to condemn some of its ugly siblings,
including fascism, communism, socialism, Nazism, and now, lest we forget,
terrorism. 'Political' means that it falls within the category of 'business'
rather than personal and where one can expect that a lot of mud gets thrown
around. Criticizing people's political ideasas heated as they may
getdo not necessarily attack the person per se.
-
- Religion is another matter however. In a society where
there is at least the appearance of tolerance for other religionsof
'being fair' and of not playing favoritescriticizing another person's
relationship with the omnipotent being who created him or her is off-limits
in a certain sense. It is not something that takes place in the 'polite'
and 'enlightened' societies of the West. We are supposed to have gotten
past all that and figured out how to live in peace with each other and
to live by the 'golden rule' as it pertains to another's manner of communing
with his creator. Saying something critical about another person's religion
is considered crass and uncouth and as equally rude as remarking that another
person's kids are ugly or saying something nasty about someone's mother.
It is too much. It goes too far and is too personal. It cuts right to the
heart of that individual's identity, and no matter how much you may not
like someone, no one wants to be mean to kids or to moms.
-
- And the truth is, I can truck with this to a certain
degree, despite the fact that I have some pretty strong opinions concerning
issues of right and wrong and who I envision the captain of the universe
as being. For simple reasons of practicality I can see why people avoid
getting into hair-splitting discussions about religion, and particularly
in the midst of some crisis such as what's taking place right now. Dogmatic
arguments (that oftentimes when boiled down are nothing more than 6 of
one vs. half a dozen of the other) go nowhere and produce nothing but noise
when there are more important matters that need tending. It is like getting
into a knock-down-drag-out concerning the right color of paint to use on
the house when it is going up in flames. As far as I am concerned, if I
can agree with another person that there are certain things such as murder,
rape, theft, and lying that fall within the category of being morally unacceptable,
I can get along with such persons, at least for the time being.
-
- But what we have to keep in mind is that these days we
don't live as much in one of those 'polite' societies as we might like
to think. The 'appearance' of being tolerant of other religions and of
being 'fair' and of 'not playing favorites' is only an appearance and nothing
more. The truth be told, this unspoken rule of religion being 'off-limits'
for discussion or criticism is only sparingly applied and in a very finite
and discriminating manner.
-
- Anyone paying attention to what is going on these days
knows that certain religions are not just fair game for tarring and feathering,
but rather that an open season has been declared on them with neither bag
limits nor penalties for poaching. Islam has been painted as being 'this'
and 'that' for several years since the 'war against terror' (i.e. the war
on Islam) began. Defamatory cartoons are published in newspaper chains
around the world and done so for deliberate reasons of provocation. The
Koran is misquoted or else lied about out-rightly and news stories depicting
the manner by which it was flushed down the toilet in American POW camps
are made headline news.
-
- Standing next in line are all branches of Christianity
that have been made the centerpieces of a non-stop vaudeville/slapstick
comedy-number now on a daily basis for decades, and of those various branches,
Catholicism more than any other. Not just the religions themselves, but
the individuals around whom the religion itself is based are defamed and
degradedincluding Jesus, his mother Mary, Mohammed or whoeverwithout
any thought as to who might be offended.
-
- HOWEVER
-
- We do findpurely by coincidence, I am quite surethat
a certain amount of 'polite' censorship still exists when it comes to that
other Middle-Eastern religion that is at the center of so many things going
on today. We see quite a few people taking the 'high road' and showing
respect (fear) for other peoples' 'feelings' and going to ridiculous lengths
in living by that 'golden rule' of tolerance when it comes to the other
guy in the line-up.
-
- But before going any further, we need to fine-tune a
few of the definitions we are going to be using in this discussion. It
is not just 'tolerance' that this particular religion seems to enjoy from
the rest of us, but rather preference. It is treated with the same kind
of delicate, cautious concern that is usually reserved for an endangered
species of some type. It is never manhandled or pushed around but rather
is always managed as if it were TNT and would explode if handled too roughly.
It is the only one that is not fair game and which is never the butt of
daily jokes, or at least not in the West. You stand a better chance of
being kidnapped by a race of space aliens and whisked off to their planet
to be made king for life than you would see this religion defamed in the
same way as takes place with Christianity and Islam.
-
- Rather, in this 'fair and unbiased' world today, it gets
top-billing in terms of reverential programs on TV. Movies such as 'The
Ten Commandments' are aired year-after-year at religiously predictable
times and never at some obscure hour where they have to compete with things
like 'George Thurman's Super-Grill' infomercials. You will never see one
of its religious leaders (or even one of its laymen for that matter) presented
in a cynical, comical or diabolical manner as you might a priest, preacher
or imam. Its followers are always the salt of the earth, never a blemish
on their moral countenance or a bruised character, intelligent, soft-spoken,
trustworthy, reliable, funny, lovable and as honest-as-the-day-is-long
-
- No, I am not talking about any of the old guys on the
mantle such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism, or Animism, nor any of the
new punks who have come around in recent decades such as Materialism, Consumerism
or Pamela Andersonism. It's that other one, and you know what I am talking
about here so quit playing dumb.
-
- We all know what the score isThere is no reason to wait
around for the blank of this fill-in-the-blank exercise to be filled in.
It's as obvious as the 'elephant in the room' that was mentioned previously.
It's name is whispered with the same kind of quiet, timid respect that
people used to employ when talking about the 'Syndicate' or the 'Black
Hand' nearly a century ago. It is the most exclusive, the most clannish,
the most discriminating of all religions when it comes to dealing with
others on an eye-to-eye/man-to-man business, and it's name is Judaism.
-
- 'Oh, right, that one' they say, as if it weren't as obvious
as the odor emanating from an over-used public outhouse in mid-July. Yes,
that's right, I did say 'Judaism' and not Zionism. No, I did not mispronounce
anything. It was not a slip of the tongue. I meant exactly what I saidthe
dreaded 'j' word that no one wants to mentionthat 'thing' that causes people's
hearts to race and their eyes to dart from side-to-side and that causes
them to run for cover and find something heavy to which they can anchor
themselves when mentioned. Judaism, the thing that separates those who
are 'God's chosen people' from the rest of the 'Goyim'The religion of the
tribe of Judah that is said to be the basis of Western CivilizationThe
thing that brought monotheism, the Ten Commandments and, as we are told
on a minute-by-minute basis these days, Christianity
-
- And since we have now established that indeed there is
no equity in this discussion involving religion and that a system of obvious
favorites is unquestioningly in operation, let's just drop this 'we really
should do the polite thing and keep people's religious views out of the
equation when discussing world issues' business. Everyone knows that doing
so is a farce. It's like getting into the boxing ring with an opponent
who breaks every rule that the referee has laid down while you are trying
to play fair by neither biting nor hitting below the belt. No one takes
the feelings of Muslims or Christians into consideration these days when
it comes to 'laying it all out in the open' and not even when the combined
numbers of these people make up almost of the world's population. At best
the Jews (most of whom are not religious anyway, short of prostrating themselves
before the strange gods of money, comfort, and political power) make up
a few tens of millions, and yet we are supposed to treat the whole subject
of their 'religion' as if it were some kind of precious gem of incalculable
monetary value? This is 'fair and balanced'? This is freedom of speech
and freedom of thought?
-
- Give me just a small break, if you would please.
-
- Worrying about 'hurting people's feelings' is not good
enough anymore, if indeed it ever was. People are dying left and right
and the life of every human being on the planet has been put in real, direct
danger because of this over-blown/out-of-proportion concern over one group's
'feelings'. One grouponeand a tiny one at that. All traffic on
a 4-lane metropolitan highway that has been brought to a screeching halt
and all because of some tiny, eensy-weensy mouse that has decided to build
a nest there. There is no fair play in any of it and no intellectual honesty.
While the rest of usfor reasons of simple respecthonor the 'no
hitting below the belt' rule when it comes to the discussion of metaphysics,
a certain minority of people who have the lion's share of media, political
and economic power do not, and since they do not, why then should the rest
of us?
-
- This having been said, let's just lay it all out on the
table and let the chips fall where they may. What have we got to lose,
after all? Are we worried about making them mad? They already are mad,
and I don't just mean in the commonly-used manner indicating 'unhappy'.
Are we concerned that with the amount of power they possess that somehow
God's chosen people might do something to make life uncomfortable for us?
That they might start a war?
-
- Wake up and smell the Knishes, my friends, Judaism has
been at war with us for over 2,000 years, ever since this man named Jesus
of Nazareth came and blew the lid open on what Judaism's real agenda was.
Judaism is a declaration of war and manifested by thousands upon thousands
of acts of intentional malice directed by Rabbinical generals against the
rest within the non-Jewish world in matters involving money, business,
politics, and culture. For those of us in the Christian world who seem
to have forgotten, it would be wise to remember that it was our forefathers
who were being hunted down, imprisoned, tortured and killed for the crime
of abandoning the 'wise council' of the tribal leaders known as the Pharisees
and for daring to follow that 'other guy' who preached a message of complete
contradiction to Judaism, and it is a situation that has not changed a
bit since that time.
-
- Besides, if wanting to avoid a war is the reason for
side-stepping this uncomfortable discussion then we are 'big-time' wasting
our time. Armageddon is not only a done deal, it is well on its way to
being an heirloom that will be passed down generation after generation
after generation. Our kids and grandkids will be dealing with it in a way
that we cannot even begin to imagine. Because of the fact that we have
spent so much time wet-nursing the egos of one small minority of people
who are said to have had a rough time during WWII we have allowed WWIII
to be born. Because of our fear of the Jews we will be sacrificing our
life's blood and that of our children for generations to come.
-
- Therefore, let us say plainly then what it is that needs
to be said but which most people are afraid to state out loud. Let us finally
acknowledge the fly in the ointment and not pretend anymore that there
isn't the smell of something rotten in the air that it is making life on
earth as it presently exists an unbearable situation.
-
- Relax, take a deep breathWe can discuss thisWe are all
big boys and big girls and we can handle the truth, as ugly as it may be.
Besides, now is not the time for us to lose our composure. This discussion
of Judaism getting preferential treatment is small potatoes within the
context of the larger argument that must take place and will. It is just
the first birth pang of what is sure to be doozey of a labor, and there
is no avoiding it. This thing known as the truth has got to be born or
we are all dead.
-
- And with that in mind, grab onto something and brace
yourself for the next wave of contractions
-
- 'Judaism is nobody's friend'
-
- There, I said it and it can't be undone. It is out there
for everyone to see in all its naked truth. There is no taking it back,
and why should we? If we truly entertain the notion of dealing with these
problems in a realistic way, then that means boarding that shuttle bus
bound for the Hotel Reality.
-
- That's right, JUDAISM is nobody's friend, not 'ZIONISM
is nobody's friend', like the essay that bounced all over the internet
for months and which caused people to go absolutely gaga because of its
'gut-wrenching bravery'. As we said before, a good number of people already
know (or are coming to know) that Zionism is nobody's friend, that is obvious.
It is JUDAISM that is the real problem. J-U-D-A-I-S-M, the tree from which
Zionism sprung forth, the seedling that has brought the world to the brink
of extinction. JUDAISM, the cancer that is eating the body away and left
it a skeletonized hull of what it once was. JUDAISM, the root of all mankind's
present evils, and if not all of them, then what is certainly an impressive
number.
-
- I realize that hearing such unflattering things about
the religion of God's favorite children will come as a shock to a large
number of people, and particularly amongst gullible propagandized Christians
who are waiting to cash in on their divine pension plan known as the Rapture.
Given the fact that God's chosen religion seems to win hands down in every
beauty contest taking place today, it is easy to see why there will be
those who will swallow their tongues when such unflattering things are
said. There are two things I will say in my defense though, the first of
which is that these are not my words, but rather the words of the man I
most admire and revere, meaning Jesus of Nazareth. The other is that there
is only one thing that is truly sacred and beautiful in this fallen world,
and that is the truth and even when it is at its ugliest
-
- Keep in mind that a good portion of this thing we call
'human progress' has been realized because people decided to abandon the
fiat currency of fairy tales and decided instead to conduct their business
transactions with the refined gold of truth. Once upon a timemany,
many moons agopeople chose to venture into the dangerous intellectual
territory that the earth might be round instead of flat. They stopped using
leeches to cure people and they declared a moratorium on burning women
at the stake when these poor creatures suffered from mood swings due to
PMS.
-
- And with this in mind, I say that it is high-time we
got a second opinion about this little tribal cult known as Judaism whose
heavy hand is at the center of so much of what is going on in our world
today. It is time we took a second look at the idols on the mantle that
we have been forbidden to touch, or for that matter, even examine up close.
What are the guardians of these strange gods afraid of? Are they afraid
that some of the gold paint with which they have been covered will come
off in our hands and that we will be left with the inescapable conclusion
that they are all willing conspirators in a massive fraud? Why are we permitted
to ask all sorts of questions concerning other faiths such as Christianity
and Islam but yet we are not even allowed to glance curiously at Judaism?
If the guardians of public discourse are as devoted to free speech and
free inquiry as they say they are (and particularly when a new 'discussion'
has begun suggesting that Jesus was gay or that Mohammed was a violent
pedophile) then why do they suddenly become such fans of censorship when
it comes to asking questions about the religion of the Jews? While there
is time, let us re-consider the holiness of that sacred cow we have been
forbidden to eat, and particularly when we all stand a good chance of starving
to death for want of the truth. What have we got to lose? Our freedom?
It's gone anyway. Our wealth?dittos. Our peace and prosperity?
-
- All we have to lose by doing this is our own state of
delusion as well as a mountain of present and future misery that even the
imaginative genius of Stephen King couldn't conjure up.
-
- Judaism is nobody's friend, short of those few who profit
from it, and they are certainly small in number, as we have already discussed.
Whether these people are one of 'God's chosen' who do the bidding of their
overlord Rabbis or whether they are one of those lowly Gentile types who
were created for the purpose of serving 'God's chosen', it is the sameJudaism
is not their friend. It works to no one's real benefit, short of those
at the top who are giving the marching orders. It does not belong in the
same class with other faiths dedicated to improving the individual and
making him or her more pleasing to the one responsible for all creation.
It does not make people better, it makes them worse. It is like a highly
radioactive element that can bring nothing but sickness and eventual death.
It does not bring liberation but rather enslavement. It does not foster
humility (the first step in breaking down the spirit of haughtiness that
impedes the reform of the person) but rather feeds the ego. It is not about
God, right vs. wrong, or the 'thou shalts' and 'thou shalt nots' in a general
sense.
-
- Notice, it is not called 'Yahwehism, 'Jehovaism', 'God-Ism'
, 'Moral Behaviorism' or even 'Old Testamentism', but rather 'Judah-ism'.
It's primary concern is with the tribe of Judah and those who make up the
tribe, meaning the Jews. It is 'their baby' and the goose that laid the
golden egg. It is a winning lottery ticket that never expires, their 'get-out-of-jail-free'
card and their Genie in a bottle that grants them every material, monetary
and political wish. It is like a highway with no speed limits nor guard
rails and where there are no rules. This is why we find that in Judaism's
rule bookmeaning the Talmudthat everything is geared towards
what benefits the tribe, and in particular, the rabbis who 'cannot be punished
with Hell' and before whose writings and sayings 'God stands in awe'. It
is not as much concerned with bringing the soul to the paradise of the
next world it is concerned with making a paradise of this one, the rights
and well-being of non-Jews be damned in the process.
-
- While the other two Middle Eastern faiths that are Judaism's
organic enemiesmeaning Christianity and Islamelevate the virtues
of humility, charity and righteousness, Judaism not only elevates, but
institutionalizes and legislates the vices of haughtiness, supremacism
and callous disregard for other human beings. It is the codified mindset
of mankind's first murderer, Cain, who slew his brother Abel over reasons
of envy and economics. Gentiles exist to serve the Jews. Rape of gentile
children, murder, lying, theft, usury, all these things that have been
condemned in every other religion around the world are given full sanction
in Judaism when it benefits the tribe.
-
- Those who are the beneficiaries of this syndicate may
scream and holler about these statements all they want, but in the final
analysis, 'facts are facts,' just as ex-slave to the Judaic mindset Benjamin
Freedman once wrote. Thanks tonot only men such as he but to others
as wellthe cat is out of the bag for everyone to see. The testimonies
of men such as Freedman, Shahak, Vanunu and many others has been the equivalent
of Joseph Vallachi's testimony before the US Congress concerning the inner
workings of the Mafia. Now the perfume that has been used to hide the stink
of the Judaic agenda is no longer powerful enough, and the mascara has
become equally inefficient as well.
-
- What's that, you say? Judaism is the basis of Western
Civilization and Christianity? Humanity owes a great deal to this religion
for getting the rest of us 'back on track' when it comes to what the Almighty
expects from us? That it is the intellectual basis for all the progress
and freedom of the Western world?
-
- Bull biscuits. Judaism is no such thing. The creed of
the Pharisees is backwards and superstitious and totalitarian all the way
to its core, something that this man named Jesus of Nazareth tried to tell
us. Putting Judaism in the same class with other religions whose aim is
progress and the betterment of man's corrupt nature is like saying that
battery acid makes a good mouthwash. Trying to credit Judaism with all
of the accomplishments that have contributed to the betterment of mankind
and his human condition is like this friend of mine who actually claims
that the reason he is as healthy as a horse is because he has smoked 3
packs of cigarettes a day for 40 years. Judaism has brought nothing of
any good to mankind. It is a culture of death, a collection of 'white-washed
tombs, full of dead men's bones' just as Jesus described it. It is a den
of vipers and a hangout for thieves, liars and murderers. It has been a
source of misery for more people than God himself can count. If there is
any correlation that can be drawn between the religion of the Pharisees
and the enlightenment of mankind, it is that all of the things associated
with this enlightenment have been achieved in spite of Judaism's aims at
preventing them or at tearing them down.
-
- Let's see a show of hands hereDoes anyone in the
room remember that little thing known as the Crucifixion of Jesus? How
about the stoning to death of Stephen and the murders of Peter and Paul?
How about the scapegoating of the Christians after Rome was burned? Judaism's
involvement in WWI and WWII? Bolshevism? The destruction of the moral,
political and economic fiber of every country in the West? Hundreds of
millions of dead children through abortion? The destruction of families
and the elevation of sexual deviancy as a virtue?
-
-
-
- and of course, last but certainly not least, the war
to end all wars that is taking place in the Middle East and which bears
the fingerprints of the Pharisees all over it.
-
- As far as Christianity is concerned, it was obvious that
Jesus Christ was as interested in the haughty, elitist, immoral and callous
tenets of Judaism as Judaism was interested in His message of humility,
righteousness, and charity. This is the reason why Judaism put Christ to
death 2,000 years ago and why it continues to gloat over his ignominious
end to this day. If indeed Christianity sprang forth from Judaism, why
then does Judaism maintain to this very microsecond that Jesus was a sorcerer
and a sexual deviant who suffers in hell by being boiled in a caldron of
semen and feces for daring to oppose the Rabbis and that His holy mother
Miriam was a 'harlot who mated with carpenters' ?
-
- And yet, we are supposed to believe that Christianity
sprang forth from Judaism? That the wonderful fruit of Christ's teachings
were plucked from the poisonous, thorny tree of Judaism? If indeed the
apple does not fall far from the tree as the old saying goes, then there
is no way that a rational person can make such claims concerning the supposed
friendship that exists between these two creatures. It is all another ruse
to get Christians to fight Judaism's wars on the pretext that somehow the
peoples of the two faiths share something in common with each other when
in truth they do not.
-
- All of these and many, many more are just a small part
of Judaism's score card. These are just some of the testimonials to Judaism's
affectionsnot only for Christianity and the civilization that it createdbut
for any rival ideology, including that of Islam. Judaism is not about fair
play, it is about winning, and at all costs.
-
- 'But wait' they interject. 'My neighbor is Jewish, and
he doesn't treat me like a lesser being. In fact, I know a lot of Jews
who are good, upstanding people'
-
- And of course, the often-heard 'I am Jewish and I never
ran into any of these supposed teachings of the Talmud'
-
- I do not doubt that this is indeed the case. I know many
such persons myself, people who are as much victims of the scheming and
plotting of the Judaic priesthood as everyone else.
-
- But what we have to keep in mind is that they are good
people in spite of the fact that they were raised as Jews. They are good
people because of the fact that they chose to retain their humanity despite
the best efforts of their rabbis and other leaders to rob them of it. They
chose to follow the laws of God rather than the laws of men, because in
Judaism, the Rabbis are God and to disobey them is to disobey Him. It's
like a person being raised in a household whose father is an avowed racist
and card-carrying member of the KKK and yet this person does not grow up
hating blacks. If such people calling themselves Jews today are decent
and who do not submit themselves to the racist, immoral teachings of their
Talmudic rabbis, then it speaks more to their own personal strength of
character than it does to the beneficial attributes of Judaism itself.
It's like that friend of mine I mentioned previously who has been smoking
3 packs of cigarettes a day for the last 40 years and he is seemingly as
healthy as a horse, or at least he is now as we speak. He should have been
dead a long time ago.
-
- And as far as the average Jew being exposed to the teachings
of the Talmud, it should be obvious why the Rabbis would not want such
a thing taking place. There is an old saying that '3 people can keep a
secret if 2 of them are dead,' meaning that conspiracies oftentimes fall
apart because of someone's big mouth. The more moving parts there are to
a machine the more susceptible it is to breakdown. It is highly likely
that if the average Jew were schooled in the Talmud and its criminal agenda
that such personsfor no other reason than fear for their own liveswould
have nothing to do with implementing the agenda of their leaders, and thus
the Jewish agenda would be like a Man-O-War at sea with no sails, no ors
and no gunpowder.
-
- But all of this is part of what we are not allowed to
discuss. Out of 'respect' for another person's religion we are supposed
to only focus on the physical aspects of the things taking place before
our eyes todaymeaning the deeds of Zionismbut not ask questions
about the causes of them, meaning Judaism. We are supposed to buy into
the line of reasoning that says that Zionism just 'popped up' out of nowhere
or that it is Judaism that went haywire
-
- as if we were too stupid to see the obvious.
-
- Judaism hasn't gone haywire nor has it blown a gasket.
It hasn't 'morphed' from a beautiful, harmless butterfly into a vicious,
pitiless creature that would devour you in a minute. Judaism (and more
importantly, its teeth, meaning Zionism) is doing exactly what it is supposed
to do by its nature. It is a predatory way of thinking and this means that
it will behave in predatory ways. Those who are trying to say that the
ugliness of things taking place today have nothing to do with the holy
religion of Judaism are trying to make an argument similar to those who
would argue that smoking has nothing to do with lung cancer.
-
- Of course, those whose job it is to manage the flow of
information and who are running their own little protection rackets and
who make arguments such as these know these facts all too well. They knew
a long time agoor at least they suspectedthat the day would come
when people would get sick of all the bloodshed and turmoil and would then
begin questioning how it all came about. They knew that there was a timetable
to their being able to keep a lid on what was happening in places such
as Palestine, Lebanon, Syria and the rest of the Middle East that organized
Jewry has eyed with a covetous gaze since before Israel was created in
1948. This is why 'Plan B' was put on the shelf for later use.
-
- 'Plan A' of course was to deny the existence of the racist,
haughty, bloodthirsty character of this thing known as Zionism and its
demon-childmeaning Israelas long as possible, and when it became
something that was impossible to deny anymore, admit to it and allow it
to be discussedCAREFULLY. Let the people blow off some steamCAUTIOUSLY.
Throw the blame for all the turmoil on some nebulous, new-born political
ideology that was born in the late 19th century
-
- just make sure the discussion remains in that safe territory
where only this thing known as Zionism is discussed, and above all, make
sure that the real source of all the turmoil never sees the light of day,
meaning this thing known as Judaism
-
- And so, this is why we have this flurry of individuals
coming forth from the Judaic community voicing their opposition to Zionism
and its aimsAND BEING PERMITTED TO DO SO, WHEN IN YEARS PAST THEY
WOULD BE CASITGATED AND TREATED AS TRAITORS. Whether their names are Finkelstein,
Lowenstein or Chomsky or whether they have banded together in groups such
as Neturei Karta or 'Jews Not Zionists', the reasons are the same, which
is to throw sand into the eyes of those who are now beginning to see that
all is not Kosher with the world, or rather that all is Kosher, depending
on how things are viewed and understood.
-
- Is this something being consciously done by those who
are the voices of 'peace and reason' from the Judaic community? I don't
know and won't speculate. I certainly hope for their sake that they mean
what they say. I can't imagine a more miserable existence than living without
a conscience and not being able to feel compassion for the suffering of
innocent others. What could be a more hellish prison than being robbed
of the life-saving salves of humility and righteousness, the same divine
qualities of the human spirit that Judaism devours as if it were a cancer?
-
- I know this is not what people want to hear, and believe
me, as much as they don't like hearing it, I don't like saying it. I too
was encouraged when I first encountered these individuals coming forth
and daring to possess a conscience of sorts and to speak out against the
tribe. I thought there was hope that a person could be raised in the corrupting,
corrosive environment of Judaic thinking and still retain his or her humanity.
And I still hope against hope that it is possible, and if these individuals
are genuine, then God bless them.
-
- But it still doesn't change certain facts, now does it?
Judaism is nobody's friend, and if we assume for the moment that these
peoplethe 'anti-Zionist Jewish types' really are who they say they
are and that by some miracle they have retained their objective sense of
right and wrong after being raised in the moral sewer known as the synagogue,
that still does not mean that Judaism has passed the sniff test.
-
- 'But wait,' they interject in one last attempt at shielding
the beast, those who act as gatekeepers in this discussion. 'Israel started
with Zionism. It was founded on it. Without Zionism Israel would not exist.
If we can just do away with Zionism we will do away with Israel and then
everything will be okay and there will be peace'
-
- And again, it is a very thing tempting to 'go there'.
I dream of the day when there is no Israel and it has been 'wiped off of
the map' as the President of Iran once noted. No more dead Palestinians
and Iraqis. The western world going about its business of implementing
the principles taught by its founder, jesus of Nazareth. No threat of nuclear
holocaust and our children sleeping safely at night with a veritable future
ahead of them
-
- The problem, again, is this thing known as the Hotel
Reality. If weby some miraclewere able to get rid of this thing
known as Zionism as well as it's physical manifestationmeaning the
state of Israel, it would all be back in due time. We would only get a
small respite, but it wouldn't be gone for good. Like carving out a section
of a cancer-riddled lung, all you are doing is buying time if you don't
quit smoking, and that is because the thing that caused this cancer in
the first place has remained in tact, and it is that 'thing' known as Judaism.
-
- Israel exists for one purpose and one purpose only, which
is to function as a hideout for those who live in the same state of perpetual
war against everyone else that Judaism dictates. The situation is like
this greedy, lying, conniving sissy (whom we have all known at some point
in our lives) who steals people's lunch money (usually by swindling them)
and then when he is about to get clobbered for it, runs home to the protective
arms of coddling parents who have never disciplined him a day in his life
and who will not even ask questions as to what all the hubbub is about.
-
- Judaism is nobody's friend, and the sooner that the rest
of usJew and non-Jew alikecome to realize this, the better off
we will be. Get rid of it. It is a cancer. Cut is out and throw it away,
as Jesus instructed that we do. It has never and will never be of any benefit
to mankind. We cannot live in any kind of 'peaceful co-existence' with
it. It is a declaration of war, and as long as it exists out there, mankind
will never have peace.
-
- 2006 by Mark Glenn
-
- crescentandcross@gmail.com
-
- http://crescentandcross.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/judaism-is-nobody%E2%80%99s-friend/
|