Our Advertisers Represent Some Of The Most Unique Products & Services On Earth!

 
rense.com
 

If Japan Is Sinking Who's Responsible? 
By Mary W Maxwell, PhD
5-13-11
 
It is at least possible that Japan is sinking.  Two months after the quake, some coastal cities are reportedly getting 'normal' high tides twice daily in the form of knee-deep flooding.  The explanation -- which we can hope to be not true -- is that the earthquake, causing the tectonic plates to move, has changed the sea level.
 
Hmmm.  Maybe it's a hoax. Maybe the whole thing was photoshopped.  As I said, we can hope for the worst to be 'not true.'  There's always that human tendency to hang onto a belief that a piece of bad news does not really augur what it appears to augur.  Some degree of optimism is a necessity of life.
 
However, that tendency to discount problems is becoming quite a major problem itself!  And people are self-censoring because they'd just hate to say something publicly that might prove to be incorrect.  It's as though embarrassment were the worst fate anyone could ever suffer.  Worse than death.  Isn't it strange that pride has such a hold over us?
 
We are also petrified, understandably, of admitting a truth that might amount to disloyalty to our group ­ especially to our social class. Note: these various kinds of reluctance to face reality should be factored in, when one is trying to figure out if Japan is or is not sinking.  They could be worth up to 70 points in the balancing!
 
Did someone deliberately harm Japan?  In my layman's opinion, yes.  I think 'someone' -- likely the same party -- also harmed Haiti (and I wish I had been more vocal at the time). One undisputed fact is that the US military  -- which does not, in my opinion, work for the US!!! -- scheduled an exercise in Haiti for "dealing with a quake," just a few days before the need arose.
 
The logic to follow here is:  If, in 2010, a military performed an earthquake against Country A (Haiti) and then, a year later, Country B (Japan) experienced a quake, it is likely that B was done by the same party as A.  (To repeat, I am only guessing about Haiti.)
 
On the website <http://juscogens.com>juscogens.com, there is a pertinent article written by Avraham Zuroff in the Israel National News on August 25, 2009.  He says the current simulations of earthquakes being carried out in Israel are financed by the US Department of Defense, and that it is a joint project with ­- oh dear ­- the University of Hawaii.
 
Zuroff also said: "In the last few years, the Geophysical Institute has created several earthquake simulations in order to calibrate its equipment. In June 2004, the institute detonated 32 tons of explosives in the southern Negev.  In June 2005, the institute detonated 20 tons in the Beit Alfa quarries in the Jezreel Valley south of the Galilee."  My God, is no place sacred?
 
While I cannot know for sure that the US is conducting weather war, I do find some of the amateur videos on Youtube.com pretty persuasive. The sky, just prior to the earthquake in Japan (and similarly during the earthquake in Chile) shows telltale signs of Tesla technology, better known as HAARP.  Even that does not necessarily make the United States the guilty party; other 'nations' may have ways of making earthquakes.
 
By putting sarcastic quote marks around the word 'nations,' I mean there are non-state actors today that are as capable as any Great Power ever was, of creating havoc around the globe. Come to think of it, the East India Company, which trafficked in wickedness, was not a Great Power either.  It was not coterminous with the British nation-state.
 
But it may have felt British enough, to the British people, to inhibit them from addressing the Company's cruelties.  We in the 'Have' section prefer not to speak openly about what we do to the 'Have-Nots,' as it would plainly work to our disadvantage.  After all,  the natural resources of the world are, to some extent,  a zero sum game. (Note: I do not rule out that Japanese 'leaders' participated in the current disaster. It often happens.)
 
That said, it has clearly stopped being to our advantage to hide the truth.  Hiding it became a central enterprise of Western culture, but we are failing to see how this endangers good old un-endangerable us. (Try crooning that word to the tune of "Unforgettable," a la Nat King Cole.)
 
We are facing major hazards, and the way out is to strap down our irrational side, including the irrationality of xenophobia. This can only be done by encouraging our rational side to come out and play. Can you do that?  If so, please do it.  Pleasie, please.
 
There is no organization for you to join. (Sure there are organizations with nice-sounding names but they have mostly been hollowed out.) The thing is to deploy your rational talents in your own locale. Of course, even when approaching only the members of your own social circle, you will get a lot of rejection.  But so what? That's the situation we're in and that's what you've got to put up with.  Big dingo.  Buy some Kleenex.
 
Allow me to suggest some steps we should probably be taking as soon as possible. (Plenty more appear in my book "Prosecution for Treason: Weather War, Epidemics, Mind Control, and the Surrender of Sovereignty," published in 2011 by TrineDay.)
 
1. Identify who is doing the wicked stuff
 
Some of the baddies are well known. Rupert Murdoch, Dick Cheney, and David Rockefeller (age 95) come to mind.  But there are hundreds of thousands of people participating at lower levels. The lower ones can be asked to reveal for whom they work. Look at the names of columnists and news reporters in your city's paper. Phone or write, cordially, to ask who gives them directions.
 
Maybe they'll say they take news stories straight off the wire from Associated Press. So call or write AP.  Before long, you'll hit a wall of silence.  AP is part of a semi-concealed group that involves both the US government and the big corporations. Well, then, at that point -- when you've reached the barrier where folks refuse to tell you what's going on -- you have successfully identified the guilty!  There's no reason other than guilt to account for their secretiveness, is there?
 
In regard to the sinking of Japan, one can simply go to any person who was involved in the making of the movie "The Sinking of Japan," which was released in 2006.  It involved both an earthquake and a tsunami.  Be prepared for the fact that some will say "But everyone knows that such things do happen ­- there was a tsunami in Indonesia in 2004, remember?" Pay no attention to this put-off.  The movie was specifically about Japan, and the scenes in it look remarkably like the real thing. (See the trailer on Youtube.)
 
Indeed, with 'special effects' about the comings and goings of the ocean, the tectonic plate, and so forth, the movie must have had some MIT-quality scientists as consultants.  Who were they? In yesteryear we could have asked Congress to call these people in for a 'Congressional investigation.' Today that is not going to happen. Therefore it is wrong to put your eggs in that basket.  Trying to get the courts to help is likewise a losing strategy. (Never dreamed I'd say that!)
 
Go instead for any type of investigation you can cook up.  Even publicizing your thwarted efforts will help a lot. The bigwigs will run for 'crisis management' cover, but it just won't be there once the public starts to get on this bandwagon. And don't worry about being repetitious in your statements.  Repetition is an indispensable tool for teaching, is it not?
 
Note:  In the suggestion "Identify who is doing the wicked stuff," the real point is to nail down the fact that wicked stuff is being done at all.  A colorful way to flesh it out happens to be the naming of names.  Frankly, I think every one of us is doing the wicked stuff.  But I'm willing to settle for Cheney (or -- bipartisanly, bi-genderly -- the horrendous Hillary, America's Foreign Minister, descendant, in that job, of the awful Albright and the conniving Condi).
 
2. In spite of the daily dose of bad news, concentrate on the normal and the positive
 
Start your mini-project by emphasizing the pleasantness of talking with good people about good things. Ah, so nice. Recruit anyone who is known to have a sense of social responsibility.  These people can be located in the community -- there are 'lists ' of such people!  Last night I attended a fundraiser for Japan and was surprised to find that the people seated near me had the same past connection with Japan as myself, namely, none.
 
I guess we are on a list, but we are middle-aged.  The young have not gotten their names onto lists yet. So an ad on a bulletin board, nominating an open place where interested people can show up ­- McDonald's is not to be despised  -- may bring a few souls.  "Few" is the key to success. Huge numbers are not needed, and are an encumbrance.
 
Money should be left out of the story, in my opinion. Everyone should simply be asked to imagine what might be feasible to do to get off the trajectory we are on.  Short-term goals are needed.  The younger the participant, the more he or she is entitled to choose those goals.  It is the twenty-somethings who will have to live longest with the decision that are made today, not the oldies.
 
3. Reward your defenders with a thank-you or an electronic trophy
 
 
In the present atmosphere, those who are fussing about Haiti, Japan, loss of civil liberties, bailouts to Wall Street (the last one was for $750 billion, you'll recall -- more than petty cash), have a sort of stigma. They are 'way out.'  They are impudent ­- impudent! -- in the way they deal with persons of authority.  Why, they may even be Americans telling the world that America is committing sin (as if the world did not already know that, practically to a man).
 
If you list the names of these dissidents, you will get the automatic side benefit of re-reading their speeches and writings.  Just email them a quick thank-you.  Will that get you onto a no-fly list?  Will it mean your car license plate number is flagged for a speeding ticket? Will it mean your aunt gets mugged, as a warning to you? Gosh what a list. Find out who does these things and mark them for identity in the Number One category above.
 
Meanwhile, keep on identifying, and thanking, the persons who have done anything in the last ten years to get us out of our mess.  Are they now deceased?  Then create a 'virtual cemetery' for them (see Virtual Cemeteries on the Internet).  Are they still alive?  Induct them into a virtual Hall of Fame. I am sure this will not only please them, but add to the 'positive' for all onlookers. We need the positive.  Can you write a song that is uplifting or genuinely motivating? Go for it.
 
4. Ask certain people to earn their pay
 
 
Fortunately there are many people drawing a large salary for doing just the things we need to get done. There are professors of Earth Science at many of the big universities.  Why aren't they doing what people would expect them to do:  analyze the strange weather events. Historically, have we ever had a rash of tornadoes like the recent one? Don't think so. So what's up, guys?
 
Then there is the fact that doctors have gone all scared. Don't they know that folks agreed to let them be wealthy because they carry extra social responsibility? Naturally, you can't put that to the doc when you are there for an appointment about your bad back.  But a few patients could jointly sign a letter asking the GP to comment on the radiation coming from Japan.  By the way, don't bother with any official physicians' group, especially if it has a goody-goody sounding name. (Ahem.) Get down to the individual.
 
Remember, your state legislature can do what Congress won't do in the way of holding investigations.  And there's no need to beg for an 'audience' with your local legislator.  Invite him to your home to meet with a handful of neighbors. He actually wants that to happen; he needs you. Upon his arrival, don't tell him that his (abysmal) performance is abysmal. Ask him what you can do to make it possible for him to start talking about the really scary stuff.
 
The foregoing set of suggestions may seem to be far from the matter of Japan sinking, but they are ways to broach a subject that is so overwhelming it can't be mentioned.
 
I suspect you've been hoping I would say "The sinking of Japan -- if it be malicious -- is the greatest outrage of all time."  Hmm. Have you got a larynx?  Then say it yourself.  Stop worrying that maybe it's not the right thing to say.  Even if it's NOT the right thing to say, you could try saying it, just for the sake of "testing 1-2-3."  Rehearse what it feels like to articulate these amazing words:
 
"The sinking of Japan -- if it be malicious -- is the greatest outrage of all time."
 
Say it to your sibling.  Isn't that why we have siblings? Perhaps you could solicit a teacher's opinion (though of course she may think you are just asking whether the subjunctive 'be' is correct).  In my day we could dial 411, 'Directory Assistance' (then known simply as 'Information') to try out a phrase on a captive Operator.  Alas, 411 nowadays is just a voice machine.
 
But don't give up: there ARE actual humanoids lurking out there.  Three hundred million of  'em in the USA -- not an insubstantial number. And a fair percentage of them need to hear anything you may have to say on the subject of Japan. They may very well be dying to hear it.
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
POSTSCRIPT - On March 13, 2011, two days after '3/11,' the New York Times wrote: "The earthquake was a result of thrust faulting [cough cough], a violent movement of the Pacific plate compressing underneath the North American plate, forcing it upward."
 
Now look back to two days after 9/11 to see what the New York Times said then (in an article by Steven Lee Myers and Diana Jean Schemo, in case you want to phone them): "As hundreds of firefighters continued to fight tenacious fires through the Pentagon's slate roof, military and civilian personnel returned to a building where the principal business today was drawing up plans to retaliate. 'We are, in a sense, seeing the definition of a new battlefield in the world, a 21st-century battlefield,' Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said this afternoon. 'And it is a different kind of conflict.'"
 
You see?  This person, Rumsfeld, had just caused those 'tenacious fires' at the Pentagon. The New York Times surely knew that, since it had to provide a lot of the script.  It probably even composed the words in which Rummy advises us to accept the new '21st century battlefield.' Corporate officers at the Times can be jailed for this.
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
Mary W Maxwell, PhD, hopes to hear from you, or about you, after you have made some headway. Her email address is: her first name spelled out "at" <http://prosecutionfortreason.com>prosecutionfortreason.com
 
 
 
Disclaimer
 
Donate to Rense.com
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At Rense.com
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros