- Preface by Ian Macdonald
- After 75 years of Zionist anti-German, hate-mongering
propaganda demonizing Hitler and National Socialism, it's high time that
the public be informed of the truth. Publishing this re-educational letter
by insightful Hans Krampe far and wide on the Net and elsewhere would be
a good way to start things off. Mackenzie King knew the truth, and was
an ardent admirer of the Third Reich and its Leader. He would readily agree,
were he alive today, that destroying Germany and sanctifying the genocidal,
anti-Christian Stalin at the instigation of scheming Zionist Jews was a
catastrophic betrayal of Western Christian civilization. He said that history
would record Hitler as the "Statesman of the 20th Century", a
prediction that could well become reality once the truth emerges.
- It pains me to think of what a marvellous, orderly world
we would have today had we joined Germany in 1939 instead of treacherously
attacking her - making war on our atheist communist enemies, not our good
Christian friends! I.V.
- Letter from Hans Krampe to Michael Hoffman II
- Dear Michael
- I have read with great interest your exchange with Prof.
Robert Faurisson and Horst Mahler, "Human Rights not Reich."
Some aspects in your responses, however, became very irritating to me and
here is why.
- I am a German Canadian, born during WW II, who for his
first thirty years was raised and educated in both, East- and West Germany.
- During my elementary schooling in East Germany, from
grade one through grade three - my most formative years - I was INTENSIVELY
indoctrinated with the glorification of communism and anti-Nazi hate propaganda
in the form of grammar, textbooks, and STORIES palmed off as history.
- The East German educators managed to weave the post WW
I treacheries, subversions and crimes of the Moscow dominated communists
into the degenerate and chaotic history of the Weimar republic, only to
pass it off as having somehow been the product of Nazism. Of course, this
re-enforced my positive attitude towards communism and my rejection of
Nazism. It formed a solid foundation for my continued anti-Nazi brainwashing
("education") in the West.
- As it turned out, East and West brainwashings occurred
entirely to Zionists' specifications and under their control. In it the
holocaust loomed large; not only in ours, but in all histories of WW II.
Worldwide, the above versions have been a roaring success!
- Grade four saw the continuance of my indoctrination in
West Germany, again in the form of anti-Nazi "history", only
now with anti-Communism added to it. The word "Nazi" was always
hissed with a disgusted sneer of political correctness to emphasize its
nasty nature. The intended guilt and shame to be a German materialized
somewhat, but only to a very faint extent.
- Additionally, my anti-Nazi indoctrination was positively
re-enforced throughout, and beyond, my education into a more or less solid
conviction of its truth by the West German media and the book publishing
- My grandfather was - and remained to the end of his life
- a dedicated communist, chairman of the communist chapter of Wanne Eickel
during the 14 years of starvation, hell and hopeless misery of the Weimar
republic. While this nurtured in me a sympathetic attitude towards communism,
it also served as another positive anti-Nazi re-enforcement even in my
- My grandfather spent most of WW II working underground
as a coal miner; which turned out to be somewhat of a blessing for him.
My father and my uncles, though, were soldiers of the Wehrmacht and, luckily,
- My parents were sympathizing with National Socialists
and admired Adolf Hitler; which contrasted with my education at school
and caused me to suspect them of a somewhat deranged and obstinate fanaticism.
Needless to say, my relationship with my parents was often less than harmonious
on that account.
- Initially, the "product" of my "education"
nestled firmly within my belief systemSuntil the Internet came about. Until
then I was never aware that I had been brainwashed. I felt vaguely ashamed
of Germany because of its Nazi past, but innocent of any personal guilt.
I considered this onerous subject as having been dealt with, ad nauseam,
- At age thirty, I immigrated to Canada. Many Canadians
(and Americans) I got acquainted with revealed in polite conversation a
warped, if any, perception of Germany's history of WW II, often constructing
bizarre, if not downright ridiculous, impromptu embellishments and excesses
in their effort to appear "knowledgeable" - and getting somewhat
testy when they were failing to obtain my unequivocal endorsement. It made
me wonder what the hell they had been taught in school.
- I couldn't help noticing a very subtle and deep-seated
hostility towards Germans suspected of less than utter rejection of Nazi
Germany's past, which surfaced either as strident and patronizing condescension
or ridicule. As a consequence, I began to develop a pronounced annoyance
with the popular perception that the Nazis - and Germans by extrapolation
- had been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a malignant breed and
would henceforth serve as THE ULTIMATE STANDARD OF EVIL, and therefore
had also deserved every atrocious horror that had been inflicted on them
as wellSand more.
- Thus it became clear that in the minds of North America,
with few exceptions, Nazis and Germans seemed to appear as synonymous,
equivocating rhetoric to the contrary - with WW II Germans as actual humans
only grudgingly trotted out to obscure the profoundly nasty hypocrisy,
if not ignorance, as it turned out, of North American versions of "historical
- Oddly to me, this was especially noticeable among academics
and the intelligentsia who, with dismissive arrogance, give Germans like
me to understand that my indoctrinated convictions WERE NEITHER SOLID NOR
NASTY ENOUGH. They knew much better.
- In other words, as a German I became suspect of nursing
sentiments of Nazi sympathies and therefore incapable of assessing my country's
history correctly. I was advised to open my mind to the much more realistic
perceptions of "North American experts", the only ones deemed
to have the requisite detachment, by distance in time and space, I suppose,
to know and appreciate the full extent of the evil of Adolf Hitler and
the Nazis - which they seemed to accept as a form of divine truth manifested
as earthly fact, based on "exhaustive investigations" and "incontrovertible
data"S convincing examples of which I have yet to find anywhere.
- Of course, they were (inadvertently) correct in pronouncing
my inability to assess the Nazi history correctly, but completely unconvincing
in that they were far more debilitated and misguided brainwashees than
- Although this increasingly grated on my nerves, I tried
to accept it as an understandable attitude, considering my country's past.
- Beginning with the U.S. war in Viet Nam, and its aggressive
interventions in Chile, its horrifying operations in Central America, all
supported and approved of by lyin' Brian Mulroney who had become prime
minister of Canada in the 80s- not to mention the ever more subversive
and sociopathic idiocies of successive administrations in the name of globalization,
privatization and free trade - I became far more politically informed and
aware than I had ever been before, realizing in the process my deplorable
ignorance in terms of historical accuracy, which kept me dangling at the
end of my rope in debates.
- Yet I kept learning by reading, and by debating in writing.
I became a critical observer, wrote letters, and was actively committed
to demand and defend such elusive concepts as truth, human rights, and
- I increasingly noticed, that whenever something evil
needed to be emphasized in public discourses, the "Nazis" and
"Hitler" and the "SS" had to rush hither to lend a
habitual hand when any other derogatory term wouldn't suffice to reach
the desired level of malice. This increasingly annoyed me to such a degree,
that I eventually felt compelled to look for the flip side of the anti-Nazi
coin to see for myself what's what.
- In short, I had it up to here with the constant German
- On the Internet I searched for, and found, all kinds
of factual and documented accounts, illuminating in their detailed historical
context, and therefore generating an ever more understanding and sympathetic
perception of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists. They also confirmed
the anecdotal events that my parents, my grandfather and uncles had been
talking about - which I had so far ignored - as more or less plausible.
I now was forced to accept their first hand experiences of the twenties,
the thirties, the war and the post war period as largely founded on real
- Thus began the gradual COLLAPSE OF MY ENTIRE ANTI-NAZI
HOUSE OF MANIPULATIVE CARDS; making short shrift of my brainwashed convictions.
- Though I sometimes found these accounts on white supremacist
websites (often in downright racist contexts) to lend an air of respectability
to themselves, they actually were based on REAL and EXHAUSTIVE investigations,
conducted at great personal sacrifices and at great danger and expense
to the investigating revisionists.
- Well, you know all about it.
- As I progressed with my Internet researches, I realized
that Canadians (and equally Americans) through their educational, info
and entertainment systems have been subject to a just as intense and sustained
anti-Nazi indoctrination than myself, if not more soSFOR OVER SIXTY YEARS!
- But, unlike me, they obstinately insist, with a nasty
form of self-righteousness, on their perceived prerogative to pass judgment
on something about which they only know hate propaganda; so much so, that
any unbiased form of critical questioning has become anathema, if not offensive,
in their minds.
- At this point let me clarify something important. I differentiate
between Nazis and neo-Nazis. The only thing the latter have in common with
Adolf Hitler and the Nazis are the accoutrements and symbols, which are
ignorantly use as an expression of the nasty propaganda image with which
they associate themselves. Nothing could be further from what the Nazis
were all about.
- When you state, willy-nilly, that you are "all for
defending human rights", but refuse to support any attempt to defend
or resurrect the "Third Reich", then it behooves you to explain
why. Standing by itself, it's a dead give-away of a blinkered view, not
to mention political correctness. And when you state that you never called
Germans criminal except those directly associated with the Nazis of the
time - then you have stated a contradiction. You accuse ALL Germans of
criminality, indeed, because all Germans were more or less Nazis, by your
definition, as you will see below.
- I therefore seriously question whether you have actually
made, or even been capable of, an UNBIASED investigation of what the Third
Reich ACTUALLY was, did and why. Judging by your tendency to view everything
Nazi as evil, your "knowledge" is based on literally billions
of tons of entirely negative distortions, spin and lies that Western historical
literature is teeming with on this subject. This makes your "knowledge"
irrational, fictitious and mendacious.
- The insidious nature of a brainwashed mind, particularly
as it pertains to National Socialism and Adolf Hitler, is such that it
presents a solid barrier to even WANTING TO BEGIN searching for the truth,
as opposed to the much more socially rewarding and easily obtainable confirmation
of its alleged evil.
- In your case, one can't fail to notice it clearly in
your exchange with Prof. Robert Faurisson and your reaction to Horst Mahler
(Rights not Reich). I suspect, that this stance accounts for the fact that
you are still at large and never had your face rearranged like Prof. Faurisson.
- My point is to show you on my own example that YOUR MIND
IS AS BRAINWASHED AS MINE ONCE WAS, and how this came about, and that it
corrupts your search for truth. After all, you're about the same age as
me and you did receive your education from the same North American institutions
that imposed their version of the Nazi era on the Germans, not to mention
the rest of the world, since 1945.
- You refuse to find out what National Socialism actually
was; presumably having proceeded in your lackadaisical "research"
under the faulty assumption that enough has been said about Adolf Hitler
and the Nazis (all negative) and that any further scrutiny on your part
would be superfluous. It's a common attitude, especially among the intelligentsia.
Any positive facts of Nazism can thus be dismissed as mere WHITEWASH.
- This, I suggest, is THE most common modus operandi in
the efforts of the proponents' of anti-Nazi/German hate, to prove the uniqueness
of the Nazi/Hitler "evil" as a uniquely one-sided "truth".
To this end everything needs to be revised in minute detail, EXEPT THE
COMMON PERCEPTION OF NAZISM. The reverse of it seems to be in essence what
you find annoying about Horst Mahler.
- Thus, let me remind you: What's good for the gander is
good for the goose.
- Concerning the history of German National Socialism,
neither the period BEFORE WW I, nor that war itself, nor the EXTREMELY
IMPORTANT interim period between 1918 and 1933, nor the period between
1933 and the outbreak of WW II can be avoided if one truly wants to know
and understand, WITH AN UNBIASED MIND, what moved Adolf Hitler and the
Germans/Nazis, as well as their choice of methods. All of it is inseparably
- PRACTICALLY ALL GERMANS WERE NAZIS BECAUSE THE REICHSTAG
VOTED IN 1933 UNANIMOUSLY TO GRANT HITLER TOTAL POWERS FOR FOUR YEARS.
- After those four years, ALL Germans approved him to carry
on by voting 99% in a plebiscite, INTERNATIONALLY SUPERVISED. SUCH A VOTER
TURNOUT AND SUCH A VOTE IS UNEQUALLED IN WORLD HISTORY.
- As a result, Germany, under the leadership of Adolf Hitler,
was quickly becoming a socially more equitable, more just and more humane
alternative to the sociopathic and predatory capitalist establishments
of war mongerers, scheming and conniving within the home bases of Germany's
enemies. The National Socialist alternative increasingly undermined the
criminal nature of capitalism's global economic hegemony by positive example.
It also inspired the basest and most sadistic instincts of capitalist bullies,
who were planning the biggest genocidal holocaust in the history of the
world AGAINST GERMANY, always prodded and needled by Jewish usurpers from
behind the scenes. As a historian you have to be deaf, dumb and blind to
overlook this glaring fact.
- Needless to say, THAT THIS GENOCIDE TOOK PLACE AS PLANNED
IS IRREFUTABLE. The evidence consists of reams of photographic and diplomatic
documentation, if one only looks for it with open and unblinkered eyes.
- Comparing the Weimar republic's performance (and that
of every other contemporary "democracy") with that of the National
Socialists, under the conditions of the Versailles Treaty, in terms of
the common indicators used to evaluate a regime -- homogeneity, prosperity
and health as a nation; standard of living; justice; freedom; integrity
of government; the general disposition of the people; the maintenance of
peace and order; and diplomatic efforts in relation to other nations --
have to be ALL taken into account IN THEIR ENTIRETY to produce a fair and
comprehensive record of either performances as a government.
- The Nazis will emerge from such a comparison with flying
colors. What the Bolsheviks promised to the German communists, but actively
prevented by violent subversion, namely SOCIALISM, Adolf Hitler and the
Nazis delivered, in spades and without violent bloodshed. National Socialism
was, and remains, the most significant unbloody revolution to have taken
place in history.
- To demonstrate its unbelievable effectiveness, consider
- While EVERY COUNTRY ON EARTH was suffering a deep depression
during the Dirty Thirties, including Roosevelt's raw "New Deal"
for the USA, NAZI GERMANY WAS ENJOYING UNHEARD OF HEIGHTS IN ITS STANDARD
OF LIVING, UNSURPASSED TO THIS DAY; with scarcely any resources of her
own, yet without needing to rob distant colonies of their resources.
- That seems to be something the detractors of National
Socialism have a hard time digestingSincluding you.
- The picture that you ASSUME to be the truth is a chimera
of the nastiest kind imaginable. Murderous Nazi Germany under the dominance
of a vile dictator (i.e. 99% of all German speaking people; plus, millions
of supportive sympathizers from other nations who were inspired by it,
including Russia, Hungary, Ukraine, Belgium, France, even England, ALL
NAZIS) has to remain evil incarnate in order for the "truth"
to be salacious enough for you. By obstinately adhering to the officially
promoted view of Nazi-Germany, you find exactly what you're looking for,
easily obtainable CALUMNY, dressed up as fact.
- Nastiness happens in every country, to a more or lesser
degree, but nowhere was, and is, it as prevalent and monstrous as in your
own back yard. Ignoring THIS fact endows you with the prerequisite lack
of humility in becoming an overbearing judge who enjoys condemning a victimized
- Revisionism doesn't need to be revised; in your case
IT NEEDS TO BE UNBLINKERED. What does need to be revised is the meaning
of the term NAZI. It's been grossly distorted, abused and misused for decades
and has ossified into a malignant burr within your reason.
- Whether you like it or not, in keeping with this hate
mongering propaganda against Adolf Hitler, that demonstrably began in 1933
and never ceased, YOU ARE TELLING A GIANT UNQUALIFIED LIE.
- I challenge you to produce evidence of a more popular,
benign and efficient system of social organization, of any nation and its
regime, anywhere on Earth, at any time in history, with a higher approval
rating by its people and a greater popularity than Adolf Hitler's.
- Hitler must have been a funny "dictator", because
he put every major decision to the people, in referenda, supervised by
international committees, and got consistent approval ratings of just short
of 100%; including the Anschluss of Austria - presumably an "invasion"
in your mind...right up until the outbreak of WW II.
- WW II was the beginning of the end in the development
of a great and promising nation. National Socialism was a nascent system,
extra-ordinary, and developing in circumstances that couldn't have been
more excruciatingly difficult in its beginning stages. Nevertheless, things
were looking good for Germany in every way from 1933 on. Contrary to Allied
hate mongering, Germany had no reason to go to war and Adolf Hitler demonstrably
made every effort to avoid it. It's amply documented.
- The Zionist dominated allied-to-be governments unabashedly
proclaimed their intent to DESTROY GERMANY AND THE GERMAN PEOPLE - not
Adolf Hitler or the Nazis, mind you ! - while clandestinely working out,
IN ADVANCE, the details of the phony SHOAH story, featuring NAZI GERMANY
as the villain, set up as justification for a Jewish state in Palestine,
and Germany's reduction to a future cash cow. Most of this homicidal conniving
and scheming took mainly place in your country.
- Had the war gone on somewhat longer, and had the Allies
had the wherewithal, it is absolutely no stretch to know that they would
have dropped atomic bombs on all of Germany and its people without batting
an eyeSenthusiastically applauded by intellectuals like yourself, no doubt.
- The arming up, getting only underway just before 1938,
and then necessarily with increased intensity, of Germany's practically
non-existent armed forces; and every military action since 1939 that Germany
undertook, was an answer to the Allies' intentions, the knowledge of which
Adolf Hitler passed on to his people. Every German knew that Germany was
going to be FORCED to fight for its very life, mortally threatened by a
world bent on its merciless genocide. Historical evidence has more than
amply confirmed this as well.
- The homicidal demons, as I see it, were not the Nazis
but THE ALLIES, including the Bolsheviks, but especially the Americans
and the Britons who have a long history that has never stopped their murder,
rape and pillage within and without their own borders. If you feel the
need to get down to the nitty-gritty of evil you haven't far to look. It's
right where you sit.
- As to your critique of Horst Mahler's use of the words
GERMAN REICHS - it's ridiculous nitpicking and word fencing about some
non-existing PR strategy.
- The GERMAN REICH is what Germans used to call their country
BEFORE THEY WERE TRAINED BY THEIR GENOCIDAL MURDERERS TO BE ASHAMED OF
IT. Just for that reason alone it's more than appropriate to INSIST on
re-invoking its name. At this point, as a German, I wouldn't care a farthing
what you, or any foreigner, might think in this regard.
- Your argument is similar to me telling you that, "the
U.S. is hated right now, worldwide, so when you travel abroad just call
yourself a Canadian, as a PR measure." Though it may be STRATEGICALLY
EXPEDIENT, it's also cowardly. All it does is undermine your self-respect
as an American.
- The self-respect of Germans has already been undermined
for over sixty years. IT NEEDS TO BE RESTORED BY ACCEPTING THE TRUTH AND
BY IGNORING ANY ATTEMPTS AT INTIMIDATION IN THE GUISE OF A PR STRATEGY.
- I agree with Robert Faurisson's stance of openness, simple
language and confrontational style (in the Celinian sense) because at this
stage you can't avoid confrontation. It's obviously being forced upon any
dissent anyway. What's more than anything convincing is PERSEVERENCE a
- Yet, I agree with you that PR savvy is more than indicated
at this stage. But I'm afraid it's lost on ordinary mortals whose understanding
and support is needed for revisionism to be successful. One of Hitler's
secrets of success was his PR savvy, when he spoke about the people's concerns,
loudly and clearly, in their languageSCONFRONTATIONALLY.
- Horst Mahler's style of rhetoric I find sometimes hard
to follow, and generally he seems to dwell too much on the spiritual aspect
of nationhood. But he has a brilliant mind and a strong backbone; and he
has a more correct, comprehensive and sympathetic understanding of National
Socialism and Adolf Hitler than you do. Therefore he has the courage to
envision the possibilities of such a model in the future.
- As to his statement about all Jews being at the forefront
of the attacks against Germany HE IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. Name ONE Jew who
does reject the holocaust as an historical fact. If you can, it will be
a miraculous exception.
- By the way, an atheist Judaist is an oxymoron. Noam Chomsky
is an atheist with Zionist proclivities, not a Judaist.
- You may argue in your defense that you've done massive
amounts of research and know what you're talking about, and that you don't
deserve to be lectured by an amateur such as me.
- To that I answer, yes, you've obviously done a lot of
research. But so have I. On the issue of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis you
seem to have wasted some fleeting glances with an extremely biased attitude;
looking for, and finding, the entirely corrupted "evidence".
- In conclusion, I suggest that you become MORE revisionist
in your revisionism in order to achieve some semblance of truth.
- Hans Krampe