- Young people would never have responded
to an invitation to join a Nazi Youth brigade. But they have responded
to social networks to be connected to their friends and are responding
in the millions to fun projects to save the world. But have they
looked closely at who is behind social networking and to what uses it is
being put already?
-
- Social networks are using knowledge of everyone's friends,
what everyone is doing, and now starting to use social networks for harm.
http://www.solarfeeds.com/yale-environment-360/17561-using-social-media-to-build-a-green-army
-
- A "vast green army" is being organized by Cornell
and IBM. Cornell is tightly bound to Monsanto, so its projects to
get young people to locate all plant and animal species in the world and
GPS map them, and even in backyards, appears anti-ecological. It
would help Monsanto to locate, patent and control even more - and all for
free, all under the name of "ecological fun" or saving the planet,
and using naive, caring young people to do the work for them. Meanwhile
Monsanto is presently defoliating the Brazilian rainforest and has been
doing that in Colombia for years, and is pushing laws to make it a felony
to whistleblow.
-
- As for IBM, they were the crucial element used by the
Third Reich to locate all Jews and their assets and to coordinate trains
to the concentration camps. The huge number of deaths during the
Holocaust were made possible only through IBM's collection of data.
(http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/) Now they are getting kids to
collect data and are using combined power of millions of their' computers to
do so, storing information not just on what is reported but on those reporting
it. This is global surveillance.
-
- The Rockefellers (connected to Monsanto and IBM) had
1/2 interest in this. Here is their connection to to the Bushes (http://www.rense.com/general7/gw.htm)
and plans for nature. Their history (http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/history_of_the_pharma_cartel.html)
and direction are grotesquely familiar. They run the UN and
WTO and WHO. Their UN plan (http://www.salem-news.com/articles/july182011/green-agenda-oc.php)
- billed as saving the world - laced with words like Eco and Green and
Sustainable - includes taking over all land in the US and everywhere. Meanwhile
the UN is letting place after place be plundered, without a word.
-
- Right now, farmers, gardeners, environmentalists, indigenous
people, around the world are working to save plants and animals and insects
and to protect diversity, many actually hiding organic seeds or knowledge
of where unique plants may be. As farmers producing organic food
or milk or meat are being attacked in the US by the FDA http://www.opednews.com/articles/Monsanto-and-the-big-fat-l-by-M-Gray-101031-319.html)
(run by this Monsanto VP http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-smith/youre-appointing-who-plea_b_243810.html),
and even gardens are threatened, people here are even going underground
to obtain fresh food, creating secret buying clubs and meeting in parking
lots at night.
-
- Will social networks be told how good it would be for
"sustainable" local food systems to map how many gardens there
are in the US, how many urban chickens, how many milking goats, how many
farmers markets (not matter how small or off the grid) and where they all
are? Agribusiness has been slaughtering animals in vast numbers for
decades and pushing into extinction rare animal breeds. (http://yupfarming.blogspot.com/2010/06/farm-animals-r-us.html)
It was only through Haitians hiding their special breed of Creole
pig that they managed to protect enough breeding stock to try to bring
back the breed. In the UK, tens of millions of farm animals were
slaughtered to "stamp out" FMD (foot and mouth disease), a non-threatening
disease, causing a number of breeds to go extinct. The two outbreaks
were caused by lab leaks (the USDA is moving a germ lab to the middle of
cattle country over the strenuous objections of cattlemen and scientists
who predict a in 10 chance of a leak). In Korea, 2 million
animals were destroyed after an FMD outbreak, hogs buried alive. (http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http%3A
- //www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DkbOMH19LKgY) Most
animals (90% - 99%?) were not sick at all and would have gotten over FMD
in a week or more. Were farmers able to hide any from the 70,000
military brought in to kill them, in an undeclared corporate war on animals?
Korea had been resisting imports of US cattle over fear of Mad Cow
disease, but now having lost 1/5 or their own livestock (with threats that
FMD might return), they are less position to be picky. In Brazil,
where JBS is the large meat producer in the world, rainforests are being
mowed down (or defoliated by Monsanto) to grow cattle and the GE-soy that
are fed, all for export to places like Korea (where they suddenly lost
their own livestock to UN/FAO rules of slaughter - not quarantine). There
are many states in Brazil with active FMD, but there has been no UN/FAO
call to slaughter any.
-
- This is not about health but about corporate globalization
of food and efforts to make sure none is in the hands of farmers or local
people.
-
-
- In the EU, the pharmaceutical industry (read Rockefellers)
under "food safety" have gotten all herbal remedies (http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/EU-confronted-on-
- herbal-medicines--chemicals-ban/articleshow/5932895.cms)
banned as unapproved drugs. From that position, they may ban gardeners
from growing herbs, which they are calling "green pharmaceuticals."
This is not far-fetched since in Australia there is a plan to ban
common garden plants.
-
- Social networks are already being used as corporate
tipsters. Young people, excited to help "save" the
earth by being enlisted as the eyes on everything, recorded by their
cell phone's GPS tracking. If asked, they would jump to locate every
animal, every beehive, every unique plant, every farm, every hidden garden,
not realizing they would be cutting their own and the earth's throat. Because
they would be turning in every living thing to corporations that are either
genetically engineering them to patent them or outright destroying them.
-
- Instead, they should be protecting the earth and everyone's
(even animals') lives by keeping secret where plants, animals, insects,
and even humans, are.
-
- The naivete of caring young people is an outcome of
their good hearts because they see good everywhere. it is not easy
to see what is going on (or to feel betrayed), but corporations have disguised
what they are doing to such a degree that the daughter of the founder
of Environmental Defense stormed the offices of ED with other real environmentalists
in protest of their supporting corporate predation through carbon trading.
(http://www.redd-monitor.org/2008/12/02/environmental-
- defense-office-invaded-in-eco-protest-against-carbon-trade/)
When words like "sustainable" and "eco" and ''green"
become PR for corporations, young people must see through to reality so
they can work with those like themselves who legitimately care. If
a group has a huge presence, such as ads on Hulu, or Care.org (using greeting
cards as a means to collect more names), they have big money coming from
somewhere.
-
- Corporately funded organizations rouse feelings to do
something positive, but usually for weak action in the wrong direction
at a critical moment. How many groups like CREDO or Food and Water
Watch have sent out messages for signatures for petitions against Monsanto's
rBGH? It is a way to say "We are with you, we are the good guys."
But did they send messages to alert people that the food safety bill
would put Monsanto in charge of all food? No.
-
- Oxfam and other NGOs have nice names but their
connections are not so nice. (http://www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net/print/Creative%20Destruction%20Part%20III.pdf)
And wanting to help other countries has even morphed into a new geopolitical
military strategy to override international law to "protect"
them, the UN demanding no votes before sovereign countries are invaded
based on "humanitarian" concerns. It is a new colonialism.
Previous financial powers went in to save souls from paganism. Whatever
they call it, it was and still is, about plunder.
-
- If young people in social networks want to help the earth,
they might watch the corporations and NGOs. For it is evidence of
corporate depredation that is needed. (http://www.survivalinternational.org/news/6986)
And it's clear the UN is not helping.
-
- Oxfam is but one NGO receiving Rockefeller funding. Below
is a list of organizations funded by rhe Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF).
Not one, despite their "caring" names, tried to stop the
Food Modernization and Safety Act (foot of page 5 for who supported it
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Food-Safety-Reform-and-t-
- by-Nicole-Johnson-100426-437.html?show=votes) though
it was obvious all food and farms in the US would be under the control
of Monsanto and what that threatened to land, water, plants, animals, people.
Perhaps they did not know, perhaps they were only persuaded to take
another course, perhaps they receive funding only to be watched.
-
- the Tides Foundation; the Tides Center; SeaWeb; Greenpeace;
the Environmental Media Services; the National Environmental Trust; Human
Rights Watch; the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy; Friends of
the Earth; the David Suzuki Foundation; the Natural Resources Defense Council;
theEnvironmental Defense Fund; the Ocean Conservancy; the H. John Heinz
Center for Science, Economics and the Environment; Alliance for Justice;
the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund; the Council on Foundations;
the American Oceans Campaign; the Sierra Club; the Rainforest Action Network;
the World Resources Institute; the Earth Island Institute; the Environmental
Working Group; the World Wildlife Fund; the Urban Institute; the Izaak
Walton League of America; the Open Space Institute; the Conservation Law
Foundation; the U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund; the
Wilderness Society; the Worldwatch Institute; the Union of Concerned Scientists;
Ozone Action; the Pacific Rivers Council; the Rainforest Alliance; the
National Wildlife Federation; Clean Water Action; Action Against Crime
and Violence Education Fund; the Pesticide Action Network; the Community
Action Project; the Consultative Group on Biological Diversity; the International
Forum on Globalization; Redefining Progress; Environmental Advocates; Public
Citizen; Conservation International; the Earth Day Network; Physicians
for Social Responsibility; Forest Ethics; the Biodiversity Action Network;
Consumers Union; the Center for Health, Environment and Justice; the Public
Media Center; the Environmental Research Foundation; the Environmental
Justice Alliance; the League of Conservation Voters; Oxfam America; the
Waterkeeper Alliance; the Resource Renewal Institute; the Foundation on
Economic Trends; the Environmental Grantmakers Association; the Center
for Science in the Public Interest; the Center for a New American Dream;
Green Seal; the Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides; the
New America Foundation; Friends of the Constitution; the Association of
Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN); the American Conservation
Association; the American Council for Renewable Energy; the Aspen Institute;
the Brookings Institution; the National Black Child Development Institute;
the Center for Clean Air Policy; the Center for Economic and Policy Research;
the Center for Media and Public Affairs; the Center for Policy Alternatives;
Earth Share; EarthRights International; the Wildlife Conservation Society;
the Brennan Center for Justice; the World Social Forum; the Women's Project
and Production; Ecologists Linked for Organizing Grassroots Initiatives
and Action; Environmental Aboriginal Guardianship Through Law and Education;
the Forest Trends Association; the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development,
Environment and Security; Global Justice, Inc.; the Institute for Policy
Studies; the Institute for Sustainable Communities; the Gay Men's Health
Crisis; Planned Parenthood; the Sentencing Project; the Lawyer's Committee
for Human Rights; Public Broadcasting Service; the International Peace
Academy; the Jewish Fund for Justice; the Meridian Institute; the National
Committee for Responsive Philanthropy; Amnesty International; National
Public Radio; the Nature Conservancy; the Organizing Support Center; the
New York University Institute for Education and Social Policy; the Wild
Salmon Center; the Pacific Environment and Resources Center; the Parks
Council; the Pinchot Institute for Conservation; the Ploughshares Fund;
Project Underground; theRockefeller Family Fund; TechRocks; the Third World
Network; and the United Nations Foundation.
-
- http://lists.mutualaid.org/pipermail/mgj-discuss/2005-April/004279.html
|
