- If we want to understand what is going on, then we must
begin to deconstruct what is meant today by 'The NOW.'
- 'NOW' has no place in it for history, for time or place,
or family or religion. It has no place for sovereign nation-states, for
humanity or especially for 'individuals and their private thoughts.'
- In The 'NOW', no actual 'responsibility' is ever accepted
for any of the most evil crimes against humanity. The War-Crimes being
committed by US troops all over the planet are not seen as what they are;
anymore than the political and financial coup's worldwide have been allowed
to be seen for the treasons they are, against their own peoples and the
ideals of humanity on the global scale.
- Instead, 'The NOW' demands that everyone stop thinking
and just 'enjoy the positives,' believe always in 'the future,' and 'NEVER-EVER-LOOK
- "The business of the capitalist is the management
of capital, and this management is generally handled through the mediation
of banks and brokerage houses. It should not be surprising that investment
bankers came to occupy the top of the hierarchy of capitalist wealth and
power. And in fact, there are a handful of banking families, including
the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, who have come to dominate economic
and political affairs in the Western world.
- Unlike aristocrats, capitalists are not tied to a place,
or to the maintenance of a place. Capital is disloyal and mobile
it flows to where the most growth can be found, as it flowed from Holland
to Britain, then from Britain to the USA, and most recently from everywhere
to China. Just as a copper mine might be exploited and then abandoned,
so under capitalism a whole nation can be exploited and then abandoned,
as we see in the rusting industrial areas of America and Britain.
- This detachment from place leads to a different kind
of geopolitics under capitalism, as compared to aristocracy. A king goes
to war when he sees an advantage to his nation in doing so. Historians
can 'explain' the wars of pre-capitalist days, in terms of the aggrandisement
of monarchs and nations." (1)
- If we were to "look back" we could see that
no matter how many times a real national health-care plan has been proposed
we have never received one. No matter how many times any politician has
screamed about 'JOBS' since 1973 our wages have been going backwards
while the compensation of those that supposedly "own" the businesses
that have reached stratospheric heights.
- (Indeed, that point was actually reached by about 1970.
Since then capital has not so much sought growth through increased production,
but rather by extracting greater returns from relatively flat production
levels. Hence globalisation, which moved production to low-waged areas,
providing greater profit margins. Hence privatisation, which transfers
revenue streams to investors that formerly went to national treasuries.
Hence derivative and currency markets, which create the electronic illusion
of economic growth, without actually producing anything in the real world)
- Of course if we were to 'look-back' we would see that
the true "owners" of all those companies have always been the
people that 'work' there. And always these people have had to sacrifice,
to 'give-back' just to keep their pitiful jobs: 'Jobs' that no longer carry
with them any real benefits.
- The exact opposite is true of their employer's because
their stock-options, their health-care plans and their bonuses alone outweigh
in one day what their employees could expect to earn in five years of sweat
and blood for pennies on the dollar. But apparently this was not enough
now-the BANKS & the Corporations and the government want to own all
your money, property, assets and your time and your dreams as well. The
only thing that any of us will get out of any reorganization of anything
that currently exists will be more slavery and more DEBT.
- This government & all its lies needs to be GONE!
- "In pre-capitalist days warfare was like chess,
each side trying to win. Under capitalism warfare is more like a casino,
where the players battle it out as long as they can get credit for more
chips, and the real winner always turns out to be the house the bankers
who finance the war and decide who will be the last man standing. Not only
are wars the most profitable of all capitalist ventures, but by choosing
the winners, and managing the reconstruction, the elite banking families
are able, over time, to tune the geopolitical configuration to suit their
- Nations and populations are but pawns in their games.
Millions die in wars, infrastructures are destroyed, and while the world
mourns, the bankers are counting their winnings and making plans for their
post-war reconstruction investments.
- Capitalism is a vehicle that helped bring the banksters
to absolute power, but they have no more loyalty to that system than they
have to place, or to anything or anyone. As mentioned earlier, they think
on a global scale, with nations and populations as pawns. They define what
money is and they issue it, just like the banker in a game of Monopoly.
They can also make up a new game with a new kind of money. They have long
outgrown any need to rely on any particular economic system in order to
maintain their power. Capitalism was handy in an era of rapid growth. For
an era of non-growth, a different game is being prepared.
- Thus, capitalism was not allowed to die a natural death.
Instead it was brought down by a controlled demolition. First it was put
on a life-support system, as mentioned above, with globalisation, privatisation,
currency markets, etc. Then it was injected with a euthanasia death-drug,
in the form of real-estate bubbles and toxic derivatives. Finally, the
Bank of International Settlements in Basel the central bank of central
banks pulled the plug on the life-support system: they declared the
'mark-to-market rule', which made all the risk-holding banks instantly
insolvent, although it took a while for this to become apparent. Every
step in this process was carefully planned and managed by the central-banking
- Our world has already been captured (again).
What is left of it is now just another aspect of a game being played by
a very small group of individuals that believe that we are nothing but
pawns that cannot, in the end, resist their overwhelming forces that are
entitled to control exactly what "the NOW" shall be for both
now and forever after.
- The End of Liberty The Global Police State
- "For the past four decades, since about 1970, we've
been experiencing a regime-change process, from an old global system to
a new global system. In the old system, first world nations were relatively
democratic and prosperous, while the third world suffered under police
state tyranny, mass poverty, and imperialism (exploitation by external
powers). As discussed above, the transition process has been characterised
by 'crossing the Rubicon' the introduction of policies and practices
into the first world, that were formerly limited, for the most part, to
the third world."
- If we were to be able to do this then metaphorically,
this is what we should be able to do to the House of Cards at the beginning
of the article.
- "Thus debt bondage to the IMF crossed the Rubicon,
enabled by the collapse-bailout scam. In turn, mass poverty is crossing
that same Rubicon, due to austerity measures imposed by the IMF, with its
new bond-holding powers. Imperialism is also crossing the Rubicon, as the
first world comes under the exploitative control of banksters and their
bureaucracies, a power nexus that is external to all national identities.
Unsurprisingly, police state tyranny is also crossing the Rubicon: the
imposition of third world poverty levels requires third world methods of
- Our world is in need of a true revolution in thought
and deed. We need to RISE and wipe out the elite's by ending the power
of their banks, and we must crush their system of control by arresting
the leaders of every facet in this society and deporting every single Zionist
from this country; and we needed to do that yesterday! The attached article
is the reference point for this thought-it is longish, but it is more than
- 1) The Elite Plan for a New World Social Order
- PS - Also part of the same article
- The Post-Capitalist Era New Myths For A New
- "2012 might not be the exact year, but it's difficult
to see the endgame lasting much beyond that and the masters of the
universe love symbolism, as with 911 (both in Chile and in Manhattan),
KLA 007, and others. 2012 is loaded with symbolism, eg. the Mayan Calendar,
and the Internet is buzzing with various 2012-related prophecies, survival
strategies, anticipated alien interventions, etc. And then there is the
Hollywood film, 2012, which explicitly portrays the demise of most of humanity,
and the pre-planned salvation of a select few. One never knows with Hollywood
productions, what is escapist fantasy, and what is aimed at preparing the
public mind symbolically for what is to come.
- Whatever the exact date, all the threads will come together,
geopolitically and domestically, and the world will change. It will be
a new era, just as capitalism was a new era after aristocracy, and the
Dark Ages followed the era of the Roman Empire. Each era has its own structure,
its own economics, its own social forms, and its own mythology. These things
must relate to one another coherently, and their nature follows from the
fundamental power relationships and economic circumstances of the system.
- Whenever there is a change of era, the previous era is
always demonised in a new mythology. In the Garden of Eden story the serpent
is demonised a revered symbol in paganism, the predecessor to monotheism.
With the rise of European nation states, the Catholic Church was demonised,
and Protestantism introduced. When republics came along, the demonisation
of monarchs was an important part of the process. In the post-2012 world,
democracy and national sovereignty will be demonised. This will be very
important, in getting people to accept arbitrary totalitarian rule
- In those terrible dark days, before the blessed unification
of humanity, anarchy reigned in the world. One nation would attack another,
no better than predators in the wild. Nations had no long-term coherence;
voters would swing from one party to another, keeping governments always
in transition and confusion. How did anyone ever think that masses of semi-educated
people could govern themselves, and run a complex society? Democracy was
an ill-conceived experiment that led only to corruption and chaotic governance.
How lucky we are to be in this well-ordered world, where humanity has finally
grown up, and those with the best expertise make the decisions for the
- Capitalism is about growth, progress, and change. Under
capitalism the virtues of ambition, initiative, and competitiveness are
praised, because those virtues serve the dynamics of capitalism. People
are encouraged to always accumulate more, and never be satisfied with what
they have. Under capitalism, people need to have a bit of liberty, and
a bit of prosperity, so that the dynamics of capitalism can operate. Without
some liberty, ambition cannot be pursued; without some prosperity, how
could accumulation be pursued? In the post-capitalist world, the capitalist
virtues will be demonised. This will be very important, in getting people
to accept poverty and regimentation
- The pursuit of money is the root of all evil, and the
capitalist system was inherently corrupt and wasteful. Anarchy reined in
the marketplace, as corporations blindly pursued profit, with no concern
for human needs or for the Earth. How much more sensible are our production
brigades, producing only what is needed, and using only what is sustainable.
Capitalism encouraged greed and consumption; people struggled to compete
with one another, to 'get ahead' in the rat race. How much wiser we are
now, to live within our ration quotas, and to accept our assigned duties,
whatever they might be, in service to humanity.
- In this regime change, ushering in the post-capitalist
era, we're seeing a conscious orchestration of economics, politics, geopolitics,
and mythology as one coordinated project. A whole new reality is
being created, a whole new global culture. When it comes down to it, the
ability to transform culture is the ultimate form of power. In only a single
generation, a new culture becomes 'the way things are'. And what, we might
inquire, might stand in the way of any future manipulations of the cultural
regime that the bankster royal family might contemplate?
- Ever since public education was introduced, the state
and the family have competed to control childhood conditioning and
it is in childhood that culture is transmitted to the next generation.
In the micromanaged post-capitalist future, we'll most likely see the 'final
solution' of social control, which is for the state to monopolise child
raising. This would eliminate from society the parent-child bond, and hence
family-related bonds in general. No longer is there a concept of relatives,
just fellow members of the hive. The family must be demonised. Already,
here in Ireland, there are daily TV spots dramatising the plight of children
who are being abused or neglected by their parents
- How scary were the old days, when unlicensed, untrained
couples had total control over vulnerable children, behind closed doors,
with whatever neuroses, addictions, or perversions the parents happened
to possess. How did this vestige of patriarchal slavery, this safe-house
den of child abuse, continue so long to exist, and not be recognised for
what it was? How much better off we are now, with children being raised
scientifically, by trained staff, where they are taught discipline and
healthy values. "
- The above article appeared in New Dawn No. 128 (September-October