EMP has been around since about 1945 and
over the past decade discussed as a very potent tactical weapon. This
I believe is the first time I am discussing the subject, but do so
because I have channeled into the portal that the Moabites do intend
to foster a false flag attack and they intend to deploy an EMP field
to actuate what is nothing less than another 9-11.
The reason they have played up Iran and the
inspections and Iran's progress is because they want it globally
accepted that Iran could effectuate an EMP attack on the USA and also
they recently have played up that Homeland Security has detected a
plethora of Iranian agents all over the USA.
The reason I see for the EMP attack is that
it like 9-11 affords the Moabites moral justification to address all
global realities linked to nuclear weapons. It also when implemented
gives the Moabites third party cover for attesting to an economic
depression for the USA something they have adeptly masked all along,
including keeping up the facade for the US dollar. Needless to add
that all real estate under the umbrella of any EMP attack will
lose half its value, instantly.
Of course the EMP attack will allow the
Moabites to fully trigger and implement the police state reality,
which they have prepared for all along. When local police find
themselves unable to contain the riots and carnage resulting from it,
then US military personnel will find a home in the USA and I have no
doubt that many of these assigned personnel will be of Mexican
descent, hiding here since Bush 43 as a enemy military always ready to
act when signaled but now they will be upgraded to wearing US military
gear.
Please recognize that even among TSA and
Homeland Security agents you have a plethora of personnel who have
served hard time. Our lives will be at the mercy of people who should
not hold the power over us they will hold -- as those in WWII had
to bow and bend to the unabated power and abuse of the Nazi SS and
similar organizations.
I tried to channel into the states where
the EMP field will be deployed. I could not see it but there is little
doubt that it has to be an area that has a significant economic impact
on the nation. The Moabites detest New York and most other eastern
areas and of course by impacting both New York and the tri state area
and possibly also Washington, the battle cry for warfare against Iran
will be heard globally and actualized.
It is hoped that this email helps thwart
this stratagem from proving itself a reality. They have held this ploy
a long time and the Moabites love it because it serves their global
design while allowing them to effectively attack the USA without
anyone knowing the truth that this is an attack the Nazis relished
since giving up on WWII.
I include material below on EMP. It really
is an ideal false flag providing the Moabites with the same platform
of moral outrage seen with 9-11. If they could get away with 9-11 they
have no doubt they can get away with an EMP attack as a similar false
flag dynamic.
==== emp material
Take a look at this 2006 article implanting into the Iranian
strategic mindset an effective way to deal with the USA, to punish the
USA for its involvement in Iran and the Middle East. The message to
Iran is go for it, and also whenever you need it here is something to
undermine the USA. The point of course is that the Moabites do
position the USA as an inviting target because it is in itself a
Moabite target (as long is proven the case).
===THE FOLLOWING IS AN INTERNENT COMMENT FROM JUNE 2011
Ah -- here is what you need first to understand: nuclear weapons
can be TAILORED to produce a large EMP burst over a nation (the height
can be selected to cover more or larger areas) WITHOUT producing ANY
fallout on the earth's surface.
Russia, China and the USA (and probably others) have super-EMP
weapons.
No fallout. Essentially all that garbage goes off into space --
since the bomb is detonated at a height of 250-300 miles. You would
not even be able to HEAR the nuclear blast! You might see a
flash.
It is true that all nuclear weapons produce SOME EMP -- but that
is not relevant here. We are talking about a weapon TAILORED to
produce a huge, devastating electro-magnetic pulse, without producing
fallout or blast effects on the earth's surface.
Again -- it is cheap (less than $50 million to cripple the US
economy and electrical grid and computerized vehicles)-- and thus
accessible to multiple groups. VERY likely because it would be so
devastating to the US (also Europe if deployed over Europe). It would
leave buildings, bridges, roads, dams etc. untouched...
I don't think an EMP blast would provoke an all-out nuclear war
(on the surface) if the agent behind the EMP blast was not
knowable.
We're not talking about a car accident that might take a few
lives.
We're talking about an EMP weapon that would send the US back to
1880 in less than a second, and cause widespread famine. Conservative
estimates place the death-total in the US at around 250-300 Million,
after about one year, mostly due to lack of transported medications
and food, and concomitant gang-killings for food, drugs,etc.
====FROM WIKI
Post-Cold War nuclear EMP attack scenarios
The United States military services have developed, and in some
cases have published, a number of hypothetical EMP attack scenarios.
[44]
The United States EMP Commission was authorized by the
United
States Congress in Fiscal Year 2001, and re-authorized in Fiscal
Year 2006. The commission is formally known as the
Commission to
Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse
(EMP) Attack.
[45]
The United States EMP Commission has brought together a group of
notable scientists and technologists to compile several reports. In
2008, the EMP Commission released the
Critical National
Infrastructures Report.
[34] This report describes, in as much detail as practical, the
likely consequences of a nuclear EMP on civilian infrastructures.
Although this report was directed specifically toward the United
States, most of the information can obviously be generalized to the
civilian infrastructure of other industrialized countries.
The 2008 report was a followup to a more generalized report
issued by the commission in 2004.
[22][46]
In written testimony delivered to the United States Senate in
2005, an EMP Commission staff member reported:
The EMP Commission sponsored a worldwide survey of
foreign scientific and military literature to evaluate the knowledge,
and possibly the intentions, of foreign states with respect to
electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack. The survey found that the physics
of EMP phenomenon and the military potential of EMP attack are widely
understood in the international community, as reflected in official
and unofficial writings and statements. The survey of open sources
over the past decade finds that knowledge about EMP and EMP attack is
evidenced in at least Britain, France, Germany, Israel, Egypt, Taiwan,
Sweden, Cuba, India, Pakistan, Iraq under Saddam Hussein, Iran, North
Korea, China and Russia.
. . .
Many foreign analysts-particularly in Iran, North
Korea, China, and Russia-view the United States as a potential
aggressor that would be willing to use its entire panoply of weapons,
including nuclear weapons, in a first strike. They perceive the United
States as having contingency plans to make a nuclear EMP attack, and
as being willing to execute those plans under a broad range of
circumstances.
Russian and Chinese military scientists in open source
writings describe the basic principles of nuclear weapons designed
specifically to generate an enhanced-EMP effect, that they term
"Super-EMP" weapons. "Super-EMP" weapons,
according to these foreign open source writings, can destroy even the
best protected U.S. military and civilian electronic systems.[19]
Clarification of common
misconceptions
In non-technical writings about nuclear EMP, both in print and on
the Internet, some common misconceptions about EMP are nearly always
found. These widely-repeated misconceptions have led to a very
considerable amount of confusion about the subject. In 2010, a
technical report written for the US government's
Oak
Ridge National Laboratory even included a brief section addressing
some of those EMP myths.
[47] Here are some further clarifications on common areas
of confusion that have already been discussed (with references) in the
above sections of this article:
1. Most
nuclear weapons effects vary greatly depending upon the altitude of
the detonation. This is especially true of nuclear EMP. The standard
reference text on nuclear weapon effects published by the U.S.
Department of Defense discusses this relationship extensively in the
first two chapters, and provides mutually-exclusive definitions for
phrases such as "air burst" and "high-altitude burst."
[48] As explained in above sections of this article, nuclear
detonations at all altitudes within the Earth's magnetic field will
produce an electromagnetic pulse; but the magnitude of the EMP and
area that is affected by the EMP are strongly affected by many
factors, and is especially strongly dependent upon the altitude of the
detonation. (See the discussion above in the "Weapon altitude" and "Weapon distance" sections.) A nuclear explosion
in deep space and not in a strong planetary magnetic field would be
ineffective at generating EMP.
2. EMP is not
a new kind of weapon effect. As stated in the "History" section above, nuclear EMP from a nuclear air
burst has been known since 1945. The unique characteristics of
high-altitude nuclear EMP have been known since at least 1962.
Non-nuclear EMP has been known since at least 1951. Electromagnetic
pulse is a prompt secondary effect of a nuclear explosion, and
nearly all of the nuclear EMP is produced outside of the
weapon. All nuclear weapons can produce EMP as a
secondary effect, but the effect can be enhanced by special weapon
design.[19][22]
3. The E3
component of nuclear EMP that produces geomagnetically induced currents in very long electrical
conductors is roughly proportional to the total energy
yield of the weapon. The other components of nuclear EMP are less
likely to be dependent on total energy yield of the weapon. The E1
component, in particular, is proportional to prompt gamma ray output;
but EMP levels can be strongly affected if more than one burst of
gamma rays occurs in a short time period. Large thermonuclear weapons
produce large energy yields through a multi-stage process. This
multi-stage process is completed within a small fraction of a second,
but it nevertheless requires a finite length of time. The first
fission reaction is usually of relatively small yield, and the gamma
rays produced by the first stage pre-ionize atmospheric molecules in
the stratosphere.
This pre-ionization causes the gamma ray emission from the high-energy
final stage of the thermonuclear weapon (a fraction of a second later)
to be relatively ineffective at producing a large E1 pulse.[33][34] (See the blue pre-ionization curve in the "Peak
Electric Field at Ground Zero" graph above.)
4. It has
long been known that there are many ways to protect against nuclear
EMP (or to quickly begin repairs where protection is not
practical); but the United States EMP Commission
determined that such protections are almost completely absent in the
civilian infrastructure of the United States, and that even large
sectors of the United States military services were no longer
protected against EMP to the level that they were during the Cold
War. The public statements of the physicists and engineers
working in the EMP field tend to emphasize the importance of making
electronic equipment and electrical components resistant to EMP -
and of keeping adequate spare parts on hand, and in the proper
location, to enable prompt repairs to be made.[22][34][49] The United States EMP Commission did not look at the
civilian infrastructures of other nations.