Is Another 9/11 In The Works?

By Devvy Kidd


A few short months ago headlines dominated the Internet and some cable network shows over the massive surge of illegal minors coming across the border. An open border by design. Now many are wondering if terrorists can come across the border? Will there be another 9/11 in one or more big cities to kill as many infidels (that would be us) as possible?

Well, I hate to tell folks, but they've been crossing the border for years, blending in with the hordes. If any form of amnesty goes through, likely some will be rewarded with citizenship while plotting to kill as many infidels as they can. Whether you're talking 8 million liars, cheats and thieves or 20 million, there is no way to do background checks on all of them; not even a fraction.

The latest flavor of savages and barbarians are known as ISIS or ISIL. Animals who have no humanity left, only extreme hatred. Evil in human form who take great delight in murdering other human beings and raping women and children regardless of ethnicity or religion. Satan awaits each and every one of them.

But, are they here?

Four Terrorists Captured on US Border on September 10 ­ Day Before 9-11 - "Congressman Jason Chaffetz broke this shocking news Wednesday that four known terrorists were apprehended at the US border in Texas on September 10 ­ the day before the 13th anniversary of the 9-11 attacks." Now, which organization do those known terrorists about to slip into Texas belong?

Military Experts: With ISIS in El Paso, Ft. Bliss in Danger of Terrorist Attack: "The recent increase in security at a key Army base near a Mexican border city where Islamic terrorists are confirmed to be operating and planning an attack on the United States indicates that the facility is a target, according to senior military experts contacted by Judicial Watch." Those are just the ones they know about.

Isn't this just grand and why were they not immediately apprehended and questioned? Dem Rep: 40 American ISIS fighters have already returned to the United States

Well, we should all feel safe since the FBI is tracking them! But, somehow in the convoluted games played by FBI and the CIA, those agencies manage to entangle themselves with bad guys who should never, ever have been allowed into this country in the first place.

Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast (6 people killed and more than 1,000 injured)

"Mr. Salem, a 43-year-old former Egyptian army officer, was used by the Government to penetrate a circle of Muslim extremists now charged in two bombing cases: the World Trade Center attack and a foiled plot to destroy the United Nations, the Hudson River tunnels and other New York City landmarks. He is the crucial witness in the second bombing case, but his work for the Government was erratic, and for months before the trade center blast, he was feuding with the F.B.I. Supervisor 'Messed It Up' . "After the bombing, he resumed his undercover work. In an undated transcript of a conversation from that period, Mr. Salem recounts a talk he had had earlier with an agent about an unnamed F.B.I. supervisor who, he said, "came and messed it up."

"He requested to meet me in the hotel," Mr. Salem says of the supervisor. "He requested to make me to testify and if he didn't push for that, we'll be going building the bomb with a phony powder and grabbing the people who was involved in it. But since you, we didn't do that."

"The transcript quotes Mr. Salem as saying that he wanted to complain to F.B.I. headquarters in Washington about the bureau's failure to stop the bombing, but was dissuaded by an agent identified as John Anticev. "He said, I don't think that the New York people would like the things out of the New York office to go to Washington, D.C.," Mr. Salem said Mr. Anticev had told him. Another agent, identified as Nancy Floyd, does not dispute Mr. Salem's account, but rather, appears to agree with it, saying of the New York people: "Well, of course not, because they don't want to get their butts chewed."

True? Not true? I ask again: Why are dangerous individuals with known terrorist ties even brought into this country?

The 1993 World Trade Center Bombing: Decoys, Aliases and NeoConspiracy Theories

"Towards the end of the 1980s, as the Soviet-Afghan war was coming to its inevitable conclusion, the Blind Sheikh escaped from house arrest in Egypt and paid several visits to the US. Specifically, he fostered a following at the Al-Kifah Refugee Centre at the Al Farooq moseque in New York. Al-Kifah was the local branch of the Maktab Al-Khidamat or Services Office for the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, and was central to the process by which young men were recruited, moved around the world for training and ultimately deployed against the Soviets.

"The CIA has remained tight-lipped about their involvement in Al-Kifah but given the timing of its development, its location and the fact that their agents posing as consular officials arranged the visas that allowed the Blind Sheikh to enter the US, it is obvious that they were at the least happy about Rahman’s growing influence there. In April and May 1989 US officials secretly met with followers of the Blind Sheikh in Egypt, including a lawyer representing the group. The cables recording these meetings were signed by Frank Wisner — the US ambassador to Egypt and the son of the veteran of CIA black ops. A year later the Blind Sheikh moved to New York permanently.

"Six months after that El Sayyid Nosair, a follower of Rahman, assassinated prominent rabbi Meir Kahane, founder of the Jewish Defence League and a former FBI informant. A few weeks later the State Department revoked all of the Blind Sheikh’s visas, but nothing else happened to him. Nosair was arrested but the investigation didn't reach into the question of what was going on at the Al-Kifah. Rahman was never arrested or deported."

Now that the new player on the block, ISIS/ISL, has shown the world they are little better than savages, it's time to bomb, bomb, bomb and and send hundreds of millions of our money to groups we don't even know for sure won't walk away or use the money and weapons they buy with our money against us over there:

Dem Senator: Obama's Plan To Train Syrian Opposition Would Cost $100,000 Per Rebel

"On September 16 Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) blasted President Obama's request for $500 million to train 5,000 Syrian rebels, saying the breakdown on the money works out to "$100,000 per [rebel]" for one year. He said that even after all that money is spent the U.S. has no guarantee that the rebels will not side with ISIS for religious reasons, and fight Bashar al-Assad instead of the ISIS insurgency. "According to The Hill, Manchin said: "I have a hard time understanding why all of a sudden we are going to convince these 5,000 [rebels] to turn and fight ISIS, who is fighting the same religious war they are fighting against the Assad regime."

And fighting is what those people over in the Middle East do best- century after century after century. Religious and tribal squabbles. Murder and mayhem, this one funding that group and some other group funding one faction or another: Top U.S. Military Official Admits: Our Arab Allies Are Funding ISIS

In that piece above, the allegation is made: "As we have exhaustively documented, innumerable examples prove how Washington-backed FSA fighters and ISIS militants were moving closer even before the two groups signed a non-aggression pact last week. In July it emerged that “several factions within the FSA, including Ahl Al Athar, Ibin al-Qa’im” had “handed over its weapons to the Islamic State in large numbers” and pledged allegiance to ISIS. Three leading Syrian rebel commanders also announced back in December that they had relinquished ties with the Free Syrian Army's Supreme Military Council, the military wing of the western-backed Syrian National Coalition, in order to join ISIS.

"Islamic State fighter Abu Atheer also told Al-Jazeera, “We are buying weapons from the FSA. we bought 200 anti-aircraft missiles and Koncourse anti tank weapons. We have good relations with our brothers in the FSA. For us, the infidels are those who cooperate with the West to fight Islam.” In addition, a recent study by Conflict Armament Research revealed that Islamic State militants obtained U.S. supplied weapons, including M16 assault rifles, which were originally smuggled out of Jordan and provided to so-called “moderate” FSA rebels.

"ISIS terrorists also acquired M79 rockets which were initially given to FSA rebels by Saudi Arabia. The rockets, “were part of the arms shipments from Croatia that were meant for the Free Syrian Army. The weapons were either captured, or acquired by former FSA fighters as they joined ISIS,” reports LJR Review."

However, denial of such an agreement came swiftly: Syrian Opposition Blasts Reports It Signed a Truce With ISIS. Who do you believe? None of the players over there in my opinion. Neither the Outlaw Congress nor the criminal impostor in the White House has any constitutional authority to keep throwing our money at foreign groups engaged in endless conflicts within their countries. All borrowed debt slapped on our backs. Enemies created by different governments - including the U.S. government. Let me quote Jeri Lynn Ball, a meticulous researcher and author of several fully documented books who hits the nail on the head:

Opposition to Invasion of Iraq Based on Emotion or Facts?

"In Stalin's Russia, notes Mikhail Heller, enemies were blamed for everything; they were used to justify the invasion of Czechoslovakia (1968), the invasion of Afghanistan in 1980, and so on. The Soviet Communists were thus able to manipulate Soviet citizens into supporting government hunts for "terrorists," "traitors," and spies, for "liberation wars" for humanity.

"Using Marxist-Leninist strategies, the Russian, Chinese, and U.S. ruling elites have sought to frighten Americans and other populations with the specter of ruthless mass terror. They have created enemies and blamed them for everything including terrorist acts. They have used them manipulate Americans into supporting government hunts for "traitors," "terrorists," and these never ending "wars of national liberation." Their aim is to manipulate whole populations into supporting "wars of national liberation" and achieving not only the sovietization of "liberated" underdeveloped countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq, but also the full altruization and sovietization of the United States and other Western nations."

How many more enemies are "we" going to create as a result of bombing the hell out of countries in pursuit of one world government and control of oil and natural resources?

ISIS “Made in USA”. Iraq “Geopolitical Arsonists” Seek to Burn Region: "Despite an open conspiracy to drown the region in sectarian strife, the US now poses as a stakeholder in Iraq's stability. Having armed, funded, and assisted ISIS into existence and into northern Iraq itself, the idea of America “intervening” to stop ISIS is comparable to an arsonist extinguishing his fire with more gasoline. Reviled across the region, any government ­ be it in Baghdad, Tehran, or Damascus ­ that allies itself with the US will be immediately tainted in the minds of forces forming along both sides of this artificially created but growing sectarian divide."

Ron Paul: War on ISIS is Foolish Continuation of 24 Years of US War in Middle East

"Ron Paul, speaking Monday with Erin Ade on RT, explained that it is “foolish” for the United States to wage war on ISIS in Iraq and Syria, noting that the new war is a continuation of 24 years of foolish US war in the Middle East. Instead of extending the war another six or more years, Paul says "it's time to quit” and bring the US military back home. Paul, who is RPI’s chairman and founder, minces no words in explaining his opposition to the US war on ISIS:" Rest at link above.

An opposing opinion comes from Larry Klayman in a WND piece, September 21, 2014: Best ISIS strategy: Nuke 'em

"Let us finally face it and stop pussyfooting around. We are in a religious war! In the end, it is either them or us. If we intend to have any chance of survival, it is also time that we face reality. Either we kill these radical Muslim ISIS cockroaches ­ all of them ­ before they spread like cancer and infest the globe, or in time they will kill all of us. It is survival time, boys and girls. No time for the weak at heart....

"Indeed, in taking on the Muslim caliphate, now being spearheaded by ISIS, we need to take a lesson from President Harry Truman in ending World War II. Showing real grit and leadership, Truman and his advisers correctly concluded that even if thousands of Japanese civilians had to be sacrificed in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, this seemingly unthinkable strategy would save countless lives in the end. And, not just the lives of U.S. servicemen who were then fighting in the Pacific theater, but by bringing the war to a close quickly also countless Japanese lives as well."

Seems to be I remember someone else talking about sacrificing civilians: 'We Think the Price Is Worth It': Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: "We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?" Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it." And Americans wonder why people in those muslim countries hate us? Some may be too young to remember, but following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the anger by Americans was a huge roar with tens of thousands signing up to "get the Japs". Americans instantly hated the Japanese because of what political leaders did, not innocent civilians in Japan who had no power to do anything.

Pat Buchanan on Syria plans: 'Are we again creating more enemies than we are killing?'

And, FDRs famous day of infamy: FDR and the Pearl Harbor attack

"Stinnett spent 16 years doing his research and fighting in the courts to obtain a plethora of shocking documents under the Freedom of Information Act ­ their authenticity cannot be denied. This link to a .pdf file provides a few of the official documents, i.e., “It (official document) directs the Hawaiian U.S. Army commander, Lt. Gen. Walter Short, to follow an official U.S. government desire: ‘The United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act.’”

"Pearl Harbor was no surprise. “Day of infamy,” indeed.

"While Stinnett should be commended for his commitment to expose the truth and help clear the names of those military officers wrongly blamed, I was shocked by his comment on page 259: “As heinous as it seems to families and veterans of World War II, of which the author is one, the Pearl Harbor attack was, from the White House perspective, something that had to be endured in order to stop a greater evil ­ the Nazi invaders in Europe who had begun the Holocaust and were poised to invade England.”

"There were 2,403 Americans who died at Pearl Harbor. According to Stinnett, who backs up FDR, those 2,403 Americans were acceptable casualties in order to take America into war. Stinnett goes on to say (same page), “Had the facts uncovered in this book been known immediately after the war ended, and had Roosevelt explained his war strategies and tactics to the families who lost their sons at Pearl Harbor, how different American history might be viewed today.”

"I feel confident in saying that the families of those 2,403 Americans slaughtered at Pearl Harbor with the full knowledge of a sitting president of the United States would not have been very understanding. I was further shocked by Stinnett’s next comments (same page), “The truth that has been told here does not diminish FDR’s magnificent contributions to the American people. His legacy should not be tarnished by the truth. As with all American presidents, Roosevelt must be viewed in the total context of his administration, not just Pearl Harbor.” Quite frankly, I would be ashamed to say such a thing.

"Allowing Japan to “commit the first overt act” ­ military aggression against America on our own soil ­ can hardly be called anything but murder."

One could go on to write millions of words about the tragedies on-going in the Middle East, who is arming who, but the bottom line is the Outlaw Congress - both parties - have allowed the borders to remain open to terrorists crossing over as well as the scum of the earth, rapists, murderers and gang members. Texas State Senator: 100,000 Illegal Immigrant Gang Members in State

What do we do? Depend on the joke called the Department of Fatherland [Homeland] Security? No. Homeland Security is OUR responsibility and if this isn't the time in history to revitalize the constitutional militia, I don't know what is. After the latest, massive surge of illegal alien minors crossing the border, good intentioned Americans brought their 'militia' groups to the border. The only problem is they have no legal authority to do anything other than observe and perhaps detain some scared illegals until border patrol agents can arrive. They have been vilified by nitwits in the media who have zero understanding of the Second Amendment or the constitutional militia. The author of the piece below refers to them as vigilantes. However, he does make a valid point:

Armed ‘militias’ unnecessarily raise the danger threat along the border

"Just a few weeks ago, a Border Patrol agent pursuing a group of immigrants along the border opened fire on an armed man. It turned out the man was a militia member. Not only did the incident pose a threat to the militia member, who dropped his weapon, but the gunfire could have been interpreted by that man as justification for him to shoot back, meaning he put the Border Patrol agent's life at risk. In addition, the confusion caused by the confrontation with the militia member caused the agent to lose track of the immigrants he was pursuing. So they got away....

“We really don't need the militia here,” said Cameron County Sheriff Omar Lucio. “It just creates a problem from my point of view, because we don't know who they are.”

It is just that type of situation that has worried me since the news broke about 'militia' groups heading to the border. For years, many of us have been trying to get the constitutional militia reconstituted by our state legislatures who are woefully ignorant of the Second Amendment and the history of the constitutional militia. Instead, they seem willing to use more Band Aids and depend on DHS and other federal dragoons to save their bacon. Let me repeat: If there was ever a time in our history when the constitutional militia is needed, it's right now. Not a year down the road, but right now. I urge you to take the time to listen to a six part interview with Dr. Edwin Vieria so we can all get with the same game plan:

Edwin Vieira, the Militia and the Constitution - that link takes you to part I. If you look to the right of the screen, you will see the links to parts 2-6. NOW is the time to go after your state legislatures to get this done. While many legislatures are out of session, getting the constitutional militia reconstituted must be considered an urgent matter. Urgent as in getting the legislation written and into the hopper for opening sessions come January 2015.

Realistically, it won't get done before then - unless there is another 9/11 or a spate of mini-9/11s which would give the madmen and women in the Outlaw Congress another golden opportunity to crush what's left of our freedom and liberties. With the way the FBI plays with known terrorists, I feel it's just a matter of time before more blood is shed on our soil. Our best defense is us, we the people and the constitutional militia, reconstituted with the authority of the state is our best weapon against homegrown Middle Eastern terrorists and ones coming across the border.

Speaking of 9/11, the other night I watched a new DVD titled, The Anatomy of a Great Deception. This film was written by a man named David Hooper who also appears in it. Hooper is just your average American family man who never questioned the official story line about what happened on September 11,.2001. Three years ago, he asked one innocent question about that day. It almost ruined his marriage, made a shambles out of his relationship with family and friends. He was just another nut out there who had the audacity to ask a legitimate question.

Hopper's film is very well done in that he takes you on his journey but tells you to believe what you can see. His research is impeccable. Not conspiracy theories, but using actual film and interviews from that day. No one and I mean no one who watches that film can come away with the same belief system about 9/11 as they had before they watched it. It's very painful because as Hooper says several times: no one wants to go there, but he did, asking questions and trying to get answers without losing his mind. Trying to cope with his job, he and his wife welcoming a new baby and the death of his father.

I purchased a half dozen copies because I'm going to give them to specific individuals asking them to view it and then give me their opinion. No pre-judging, just what do you think? For those of us who have been attacked or ridiculed by family and/or friends (and even fellow writers), Hooper's film is a way to get those you know who don't want to hear anything other than the official story line to look at what one man went through simply because he wanted to know the answer to his question. I believe Americans can relate to that better than they can getting hit over the head with a sledgehammer.

The Anatomy of a Great Deception: One Man's Personal 9/11 Journey: "A personal journey of discovery began just over three years ago for businessman and filmmaker David Hooper when he began to ask questions about what really happened on September 11, 2001. The result of his quest is a ground-breaking documentary, The Anatomy of a Great Deception.

"During his search for answers, each question Hooper asked led to another, until eventually he deduced that the official story of how 9/11 transpired simply couldn't be true. Besides the emotional upheaval of that realization, Hooper faced the added pain of feeling isolated from family members and friends, who shared neither his conclusions nor his conviction that America had been betrayed. So, as a way of reaching out to loved ones, Hooper decided to make the film, in hopes that it would help them grasp the facts that had shattered his worldview."

One of the new pieces of information in the film I had not seen is a clip by Susan Lindauer. Who is she? Amazon:

"Former Congressional staffer Susan Lindauer covered Iraq and Libya at the United Nations, as a U.S. Intelligence Asset and back door channel on anti-terrorism from 1993 to 2003. Most notoriously, in the summer of 2001, her team warned about a major terrorist attack involving airplane hijackings and a strike on the World Trade Center. Lindauer also campaigned heavily against the War in Iraq, and developed a comprehensive peace framework through her back-channel in the run up to War. This is the story of what happened when Lindauer tried to disclose the true facts of Iraqi Pre-War Intelligence and the 9/11 warning to Congress and the American people. It details the nightmare of her arrest on the Patriot Act and her imprisonment without a trial at the notorious prison inside Carswell Air Force Base in Texas. Extreme Prejudice is a true life spy thriller."

In the film, Lindauer talks about trucks coming to the WTC towers in the middle of the night shortly before September 11th; that one is a shocker. I have known for a long time about the towers being closed the weekend before that horrible day, but not about those trucks. You can also listen to her (I highly recommend) in a fairly short interview talking about those trucks in detail. Lindauer's life was flipped upside down and turned into hell on earth. What happened to her should NEVER happen to anyone in our country who attempts to tell the truth - no matter who is responsible for such heinous crimes like 9/11. Laudauer is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq

One thing I want you to keep in mind if you watch The Anatomy of a Great Deception: Look at the credentials of those being interviewed. Scientists, physicists, pilots, engineers with credentials a mile long. Are they all nuts? Do they all hate Bush? Are they all nothing more than conspiracy whack jobs wearing tin foil hats? Only someone afraid of the truth would say yes. Seeking the truth about 9/11 has been about as popular as seeing a proctologist. Yet, the professionals interviewed in that film have stood firm for the truth regardless of the labels slapped on them. As for the eyewitnesses at 'ground zero' and the Pentagon, why would they lie about what they saw? Book deals? None. Fame and fortune? Hardly. They saw what they saw up close and personal.

9/11 is the justification for draconian "laws" like the "Patriot" Act, the NDAA and endless undeclared wars in the Middle East. The truth must be exposed instead of clinging to old lies because they're easier to swallow. As Patrick Henry said: "For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it."


1 - IMPORTANT: What is the constitutional militia vs private ones?
2 - Interview with FBI Whistler blower Sibel Edmonds about Operation Gladio
3 - 3 High Level Intelligence Operatives Who Exposed 9/11 Foreknowledge
Government ignored repeated warnings from inside the system
4 - Dem Rep Calls Obama's Plan to Arm Syrian Rebels 'Lame'
5 - Stay out of latest Muslim civil war

Click here to visit home page.

© 2014 - and Devvy - All Rights Reserved

Donate to
Support Free And Honest
Journalism At
Subscribe To RenseRadio!
Enormous Online Archives,
MP3s, Streaming Audio Files, 
Highest Quality Live Programs


This Site Served by TheHostPros