able, disinterested, public-spirited press, with trained intelligence
to know the right and courage to do it, can preserve that public
virtue without which popular government is a sham and a mockery."
have been doing the job of the disgraced media including cable 'news'
networks for decades. In-depth, thorough investigations of corrupt politicians.
Millions of words are written or spoken every week on the stupid tube,
radio and print that the liberal media has an agenda. Too many
alleged big name 'conservative' mouthpieces are guilty of the same thing
- especially when it comes to presidential eligibility as set forth
in the U.S. Constitution.
liberal and 'conservative' heavies in print and electronic media continue
to push the big lie regarding presidential eligibility: a 'natural born
citizen' is a child of one U.S. citizen at the time of birth. That is
not true, but they don't care. The Republican National Party and their
elites allowed a constitutionally ineligible candidate, Barry Soetoro
aka Obama, to run twice, get on the ballot in all 50 states and accepted
the electoral college vote based on fraud. The Republican Party did
nothing when Nancy Pelosi and her coconspirators committed fraud by
documents proclaiming Barry eligible to all the Secretaries of States.
is NO question Marco Rubio is ineligible. NO question since neither
of his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth.
Rubio's parents were foreign nationals when he was born. Rubio's parents
didn't become U.S. citizens until he was four years old. His name should
not be on any ballot in any state.
Cruz knew two years ago this was going to be a problem, just like the
criminal impostor in the White House knew. Soetoro was born with dual
citizenship: A British citizen and U.S. citizen. That's also the legal
issue here with Cruz.
legally renounced his Canadian citizenship. Cruz wants everyone to believe
that since his mother was a U.S. citizen at the time he was born, that
makes him a 'natural born' citizen. It does not. Both parents
must be U.S. citizens at the time the child is born. Ted Cruz's
father was not a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth.
came the revelation there is no evidence proving Cruz's parents filed
a Consular Report of Birth Abroad. Cruz refuses to produce that
legal document. No different than the fraud in the White House hiding
and then producing a forged birth certificate. What is Cruz hiding?
This is Barry Obama all over again. Cruz was eager to plaster revocation
of his Canadian citizenship all over the Internet and for the press,
so why not the Consular Report of Birth Abroad - one certified and stamped
by the State Department ? If the document exists, release it, but it
still doesn't make him eligible.
finally, I believe the final nail in Cruz's web of lies has now caught
up to him. JB Williams broke this in
his recent column and here's the exact text from the Government
of Canada's official
web site regarding citizenship [Emphasis mine]:
Citizenship Act [January 1, 1947]
to January 1, 1947, there was no legal status of Canadian citizens,
only British subjects. This Act gave legal recognition to the terms
“Canadian citizen” and “Canadian citizenship”.
The Act established who was and who could become a Canadian citizen.
There were many provisions for loss of citizenship, including retention
provisions for the first and subsequent generations born outside Canada.
The Act also contained provisions which provided special treatment for
British subjects. In general, Canadian citizens who acquired citizenship
of another country automatically lost Canadian citizenship (dual
citizenship was not recognized).
Act [February 15, 1977]
Citizenship Act, effective February 15, 1977, replaced the 1947 Act
with a more equitable statute. For example, British subjects no longer
received special treatment and dual citizenship became recognized.
There was only one provision for automatic loss of citizenship, limited
to persons born in the second or subsequent generation outside Canada
unless they took steps to retain their citizenship by their 28th birthday."
Cruz was born on December 22, 1970. Dual citizenship
was not recognized in Canada at the time of his birth. Dual citizenship
in Canada was not recognized until 1977.
he legally renounced his Canadian citizenship and thus far Cruz has
refused to provide any legal proof he became a U.S. citizen along the
way, it appears he has no citizenship for either Canada (renounced)
or the United States.
Cruz never became a U.S. or naturalized citizen of the U.S. and has
given up his Canadian citizenship, then what country does he claim citizenship
he has no provable, legal citizenship in the US he cannot run for any
office never mind president and no Secretary of State in this country
can allow his name on the ballot. It's too late for Iowa, NH and probably
South Carolina, but not the other 47 states.
did not create Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio's legal mess nor did any other
journalist doing their job. They did and must now suffer the consequences.
Trump, according to news reports, says he will sue Ted Cruz: "If
@TedCruz doesn't clean up his act, stop cheating, & doing negative
ads, I have standing to sue him for not being a natural born citizen."
Yes, Trump would have legal standing to challenge the ineligibility
of both Cruz and Rubio and it should be done now before the primaries
go any further.
must happen? Do the same as I am this week. A letter
to the Secretary of State here in Texas with a copy to our State Attorney
General and Governor to the point:
Cruz is not a U.S. citizen in any flavor and cite Canadian law
above. Therefore, it will be fraud by your office to put him
on the ballot under the category for president nor can Ted Cruz vote
in the State of Texas unless he can prove - not another forged document
like Barry Obama used - that at some point he became a naturalized citizen
which still prohibits him for running for president. Heck, send a copy
of this column along with a cover letter.
every Secretary of State (with a copy to the Governor and Attorney
General in your state) gets 10,000 letters and Donald Trump
moves on this we might actually see the Constitution upheld.
Back your opponent into a corner they can't get out of.
I believe Donald Trump should do is retain Dr. Edwin Vieira (if he will
do it) so Edwin can advise the Republican National Committee and Secretaries
of States for the remaining 47 who have not yet held their primaries
that both Rubio and Cruz must not be on their state ballot because Cruz
is neither naturalized (unless he can suddenly find some document to
prove it), he has no citizenship because he renounced his Canadian citizenship
and he is not natural born as required by the U.S. Constitution. Edwin
could make this a win and if they want a fight, Donald Trump has the
money to take them on.
Antonin Scalia passed away, February 13, 2016. A sad day for America
to lose such a voice for we the people. A man of God who will be sorely
missed. I bring this up because this is a state issue and sure as the
sun shines, Cruz supporters will want this to go to the U.S. Supreme
Court. Who the state puts on a ballot for elections held in
each state is a state issue whether it's a candidate for a state house,
Governor, president or any public office.
States Determine the Eligibility of Ted Cruz to Run for President?
courts are loathe to decide “political questions” particularly
when those questions place judges in the unenviable position of being
tasked with upholding the Constitution at the cost of disqualifying
a man who, if elected anyway, would wield immense power.
is, however, precedent for a such a situation. In 2008, an elector from
California challenged the eligibility of John McCain to serve as president,
given that he was born in the Panama Canal Zone. Judge William Alsup
of the U.S. District Court for Northern California heard the case and
ruled that Article III of the Constitution places the deciding of such
“political questions” outside the jurisdiction of the federal
judges, however, are not bound by the Constitution's separation of powers.
In fact, the Tenth Amendment protects the “numerous and indefinite”
powers of the states that created the federal authority. Another provision
of the Constitution, in fact, seems to specifically reserve to the states
the power to decide the eligibility of candidates for federal office.
Article I, Section 4 reads, “The times, places and manner of holding
elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each
state by the legislature thereof.”
an article reporting on the authority of the states to determine the
eligibility of Ted Cruz (or any other candidate of questionable constitutional
qualification), the Washington Post cited a scholarly analysis of the
issue by Ohio State University law professor Daniel Tokaji printed in
the Michigan Law Review: Far-fetched as that seems, supporters of John
F. Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign brought a state court challenge
to Ralph Nader’s candidacy based on a state law that, according
to Tokaji, “prohibited candidates from running in a general election
after running in state primaries.”
constitutionalists and friends of liberty, this approach has not only
merit, but the hope of simultaneously shoring up the sovereignty of
the states and of protecting the union from the dangerous precedent
of putting aside constitutional qualifications for federal officers."
past lawsuits filed regarding the usurper in the White House,
Secretaries of State said it's not their job to verify any candidate
as to eligibility and the courts let them get away with it.
However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals out in California
ruled against a Peace & Freedom Party candidate, Peta Lindsay,
when she ran for president because she did not meet constitutional
eligibility. Ms. Lindsay was only 27 years old. The Constitution
requires age 35 as the minimum. Her name was removed from the
memory serves me right from 2008 - 2011 about a dozen state courts said
anyone could run for president and that included Barry Obama. Secretaries
of State said they had no statutory authority to verify whether or not
any candidate was eligible for the office they were seeking. What horse
manure. What those state courts and Secretaries of State said is anyone
can run for president. What Secretaries of State said is all the RNC
or DNC has to do is fill out the required form even if the information
is false or a lie and that's just fine with them! We might as well then
be just another Banana Republic and our elections nothing but a free
for all and the Constitution is of no consequence.
Trump can take the high road on this by stating there are two
candidates who are not constitutionally eligible to be on the ballot,
Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. My actions would be the same if the candidates
were John Kasich or Dr. Ben Carson. I am running to take an oath to
preserve and protect the U.S. Constitution and that's what I'm doing.
It's a most unfortunate situation for both candidates and their supporters
but surely they (Ted Cruz being a lawyer and former Solicitor General
for the State of Texas) should have known they do not meet constitutional
eligibility. For now my legal team is addressing this serious issue.
leave it at that so hyenas in the media like Megyn Kelly at FOX don't
have any ammunition to rip him apart on their shows. If the
media hounds him, Trump can simply say: My legal team is addressing
this issue. Americans should care. I hope they do and that's all I'm
going to say about it right now. Thank you.
I have said ad nauseum over the past 25 years: Either we are a nation
of laws or lies but we can't be both and be a great nation. The lies
and fraud perpetrated upon the American people must stop.
click on "Mass E-mailing" below and
send this article to all your friends.
a short note about 9/11 and Smart Electric Meeters.
The cost of America's undeclared "war" (invasion) in Afghanistan
has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on
us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column
know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military
grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested
from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released:
Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation,
but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or
give a copy as a present. I've purchased half a dozen copies and given
them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It's very powerful simply
because it's one 'ordinary' man's story who ask a simple question that
led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in
this film that many have never heard about but everyone should.
Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend.
see video on the dangers of Smart Meeters on your home, titled: Take
Back Your Power.]
© 2016 - NewsWithViews.com
and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com