-
- We are in Baghdad in 1991, and something strange is happening.
A hush falls over the city as a huge shimmering face materialises in the
sky. Soldiers and citizens prostrate themselves as each hears the voice
of Allah, commanding them to overthrow the evil and treacherous Saddam
Hussein. Within minutes an angry mob is storming the palace as the guards
flee ...
-
- This highly imaginative scenario was proposed by US Air
Force (USAF) planners for a bloodless victory in the Gulf conflict. The
idea of putting words in God's mouth is not new. In the second century
AD Lucian described a statue of the god Aesculapius that spoke to believers,
aided by a hidden priest with a speaking tube.
-
- The Baghdad plan involved projecting a giant hologram
over Iraq. This kind of projection requires a mirror behind it. The scale
of the project dictated a mirror several kilometres across up in space.
So far the largest mirror developed has been 30 metres wide and present
versions are too small to produce a convincing image at ground level.
-
- Another approach would be to make a mirror out of thin
air. When warm air lies on top of cold air, the difference in density is
enough to bend light. At higher altitudes, a mirage can make whole landscapes
appear in the sky. An artificial mirage could in theory be made by heating
the atmosphere with radio waves or microwaves.
-
- The military certainly appears to believe in the potential
use of holograms. A USAF think-tank has devised uses ranging from deceptive
holographic imaging to the Star Trek-sounding distortion field projector.
These are described as useful for strategic deception purposes, particularly
against an unsophisticated adversary. They would be projected by a special
aircraft, an airborne hologram projector.
-
- Perhaps the nearest current equivalent is the Commando
Solo, a modified Hercules festooned with aerials and antennae and carrying
pods of classified electronics. It can transmit across the electromagnetic
spectrum, including radio and television signals.
-
- The face of God needs a voice. A new technique using
microwaves could produce this. When a high-power microwave pulse strikes
the human body, a small temperature disturbance occurs, causing an expansion
of tissue that can create an acoustic wave. A report from the USAF scientific
advisory board says: "With a pulse stream, an internal acoustic field
of 5-15KHz can be created which is audible. Thus it may be possible to
'talk' to adversaries in a way which would be most disturbing to them."
-
- The practical difficulties in microwave transmission
are formidable. The exact sound perceived depends on the size and shape
of the hearer's skull and orientation to the source. Microwaves can be
reflected or dampened by solid objects, so God's voice could have the underwater
quality of poor radio reception. And would you believe in a God whose voice
drops off when you walk behind a lamp-post?
-
- But there were other problems with the plan. Images of
Allah are forbidden in Islam. How can you project an image of God when
nobody knows what He is supposed to look like?
-
- And the citizens of Baghdad are not superstitious savages,
prone to fleeing at the sound of a disembodied voice from a gramophone.
They have been exposed to years of computer-generated imagery and flashy
special effects. If God's image did appear in the heavens, someone would
be bound to suggest it was all done with mirrors.
-
- The Guardian
-
- ----
-
- From: sightings@mindspring.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 14:09:22 -0800
- To: neff1@mindspring.com
- Subject: IMPORTANT ADD to Microwave Into Brain story
- Cc: eotl@west.net
-
-
-
- Comment
-
- Guardian's Statement Just Ticked Me Off!
- From <margaret4@juno.com
- 2-8-00
-
-
- I have read the article on the Sightings web site and
have the following to input. As for Guardian's statements in that article,
I have my own responses to both "him" and the article. http://sightings.com/health3/hearingvoices.htm
-
- "The practical difficulties in microwave transmission
are formidable."
-
- ---I'm sure the difficulties of the 50's have been improved
upon by the 90's. Just look around at the simple technology that's improved
greatly over this time. What is his definition of "formidable"?
Sounds like a vague statement to me.
-
- "The exact sound perceived depends on the size and
shape of the hearer's skull and orientation to the source."
-
- ---So what? That does not discount that it's still coming
through loud and clear for many people. Besides, how would Guardian know
this about "size and shape" and what program is he involved
with to know this?
-
- "Microwaves can be reflected or dampened by solid
objects, so God's voice could have the underwater quality of poor radio
reception. And would you believe in a God whose voice drops off when you
walk behind a lamp-post? "
-
- ---The issue is not the quality of the transmission,
but the fact that stuff like this is going on. How many will question "quality"
when that starts happening to them? (Given the current trends on brainwashing,
and I'm talking about media and news sources.) I think we're going to
have a lot of pissed off people. Guardian also fails to acknowledge the
"euphoria" we might experience, be it a side effect of this,
or the direct result of more shit being blasted at us by other methods
to weaken our defenses. That alone would be enough to cloud our heads
while we try to figure it all out. People will be deceived.
-
- The fact that buzzing, popping noises, whines and static
are still enough to unnerve some people, and even scarier when a voice
is intermittently picked up through all of that. Not to mention the people
who are picking up voices loud and clear. Project Blue Beam does exist......my
question is, WHY DOES IT EXIST?
-
- The article also smacks of racism. Does the USAF believe
that the people in that country are dumb and uneducated? Or is Guardian
trying to be subtle in his own attempts to get this across to us "lesser
knowing" individuals? (What are they trying to sell us here?) People
in the Arab and middle east countries are highly educated, more so than
we in the US. Children that graduate from high school over there have acquired
knowledge that we here in the US must attend college and pay more money
for. I know this to be a fact. Trigonometry and calculus are taught in
their normal curriculum at about the time that our kids are just beginning
to learn about algebra and geometry. Learning more than one language is
mandatory from the first grade, not elective in later grades. They'd probably
be less inclined to believe it was Allah than your average American. Sounds
more like something a Jin (look that one up, Guardian) would do, not so
far fetched that the guns would be turned against the image in a mass "statement".
-
- What else was this article passing before us? That we
are so superior that we can do this to another country of people? Are
we given a false sense of security to think that our defenses are all-powerful
and great? Is this being used in the name of Freedom and Democracy or for
control? BLOODLESS? (I'm laughing at this one because surely Guardian has
underestimated the Moslems belief system. Someone did not do their homework.)
And what about that statement "images of Allah are forbidden in Islam"
?? In what religion or country do we have a face of God to view? (Allah
is God is Jehova is The Almighty, don't try to pass it off as something
different.) It's not just Islam where we do not have God's face. Are
we not also forbidden as Christians, Jews, etc, to make graven images of
God's face? He has attempted here to make it sound that only the Moslems
are not allowed to make an image of God's face. Got news for you Guardian,
NONE OF US ARE.
-
- Do not look at the Islamic countries and make judgements
based on what you see. Those people you perceive as living in substandard
conditions are better educated than your average westerner. Why do I get
the feeling that Guardian has spent NO time whatsoever in any middle eastern
country? I think he's making a broad statement about his own views of
the Islamic peoples.
-
- The more I read this article, the more uncomfortable
I am with it. End result, it smacks of so much propaganda. Sounds more
like someone is trying to get people to agree with the uses of this technology
rather than exposing the fact of it's misuse. While at the same time,
trying to get us to have a perverted view of Islam.
-
- Please feel free to use this letter or parts of it as
you wish.
-
- Mag
-
- _____
-
- From Eleanor White <raven1@bestnet.org
- 2-8-2000
-
-
- Jeff:
-
- This morning Victor Fletcher forwarded me a link to an
article on your site, details follow here:
-
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 17:27:49 -0500
- From: Victor Fletcher <vpflet@remoteviewing.com
- To: Eleanor White <raven1@bestnet.org
- Subject: How Microwaves Can Beam Voices Directly
Into The Brain?
-
- http://sightings.com/health3/hearingvoices.htm
-
- One contentious paragraph reads:
-
- "The practical difficulties in microwave transmission
are
- formidable. The exact sound perceived depends on the
- size and shape of the hearer's skull and orientation
to the
- source. Microwaves can be reflected or dampened by
- solid objects, so God's voice could have the underwater
- quality of poor radio reception. And would you believe
in
- a God whose voice drops off when you walk behind a
- lamp-post? "
-
- signed "Guardian"
-
- "Mr. Guardian" apparently is an expert in voice
to
- skull technology.
-
- Sarcastically, I'm relieved to learn that all the torture
- I've suffered through for the past 20 years is all my
- imagnination.
-
- Sarcastically, of course! Voice to skull can't possibly
- work! How foolish of all of us V2S targets to think
- it could ever work.
-
- After all, science history shows one thing very, very
- clearly: Technology N-E-V-E-R develops past the
- primitive, prototype stages! Why, today's jet
- fighters perform no better than the Wright brothers'
- first bi-plane!
-
- Today's computers are no different than those available
- in the 1950s! Space travel, what a laugh! Why, rocketry
- is no more advanced today than it was in the black powder
- days in ancient China!
-
- And dear me! I overlooked the fact that the first unclassified
- voice to skull success was a mere 17 years ago, meaning
- the first classified success was probably 40+ years ago.
- Why, that's no time at all to develop improvements!
-
- And since governments are always completely honest,
- we KNOW that if there were improvements, the public
- would be told right away!
-
- Based on Mr. Guardian's clear, expert assessment, I'm
- going right out today and see the nearest psychiatrist,
- since obviouly I and the other 300 are all raving lunatics!
-
- Eleanor White
-
- SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|