SIGHTINGS



Chemtrail Jets Said Photographed
In The Act Over New Mexico
Original Story Link Here
6-7-99
 
 
REBUTTAL
 
From Kurt F. Beswick <kurt@oculusdesign.com
6-7-99
 
 
Mr. Carnicom,
 
In regards to your alledged "chemtrail" photos-----I am far from convinced that what you photographed is anything more than standard airliners traveling at normal altitudes creating NORMAL contrails. My partner's (business) brother is a KC-135 Stratotanker pilot for the U.S. Airforce, he is currently flying in Kosovo refueling F-15's as I write this. I am an amateur military/civilian aircraft buff and a certified spotter in the Air Force Auxilliary (1994-1996) Group 9 Composite Wing, Pembroke Pines, Florida.
 
I am NOT denying or trying to debunk the fact that there is REAL spraying going on by KC-135 tanker aircraft operated by SOME branch of the government, or whoever, we may never know. I am NOT out to make enemies, however, I am a truth-seeker as well and there are way TOO many conspiracy theories that have arisen in the last several years which make true Ufological/Govern. Cover-Up researchers look like fools. I am a stickler for getting the facts straight, and when it comes to the subject of the "Chemspraying"--the only thing I'm convinced of is that NOBODY has presented any hard evidence of something going on. I've been hearing about "Lab Tests" being done on gelatinous material that has fallen from the sky, I've heard about thousands of people becoming sick from alledged "spraying" but I've seen NO medical reports, NO medical confirmations, no blood sample tests, no air quality sample results. Nothing. The photos depict 757's one of which (con1100.jpg) looks to be an LTU aircraft (distinctive red-painted fuselage).
 
The fact that the contrail begins at the trailing edge of the rear horizontal stabilizers means absolutely nothing. When tankers are used to spray any type of material, #1) they utilize nozzles in the trailing wing-root extensions of the main wing and/or a group of nozzles at the very tip of the end of the fuselage (where there is already a port for dumping fuel). NOT from the edges of the rear horizontal stabilizer. The distance from the rear of the engine that the contrail begins is based ENTIRELY upon the altitude, type of fuel, atmospheric conditions, and throttle setting of the aircraft.
 
I have seen several HIGHLY questionable "chemtrail" photos out there, but nothing you have here proves really anything. However, I must commend you on your photography skills!! Very impressive indeed, great clarity and detail. Where were you in 1996 when the Aurora left a magnificent contrail about 90,000 feet above Amarillo, Texas?!!? We could've used a nice close-up shot of that!!! ;-)
 
I'm really not trying to do anything beyond weed out fact from fiction. I've been a researcher in this field for about 6 years, I've done photographic analysis over the years for Dr. Roger Leir, Ed Walters, and Mike Lindemann to name a few and I'd like to find something regarding this "chemtrail" issue that I could really sink my teeth into, but so far we have nothing but pics of airliners flying regular routes leaving behind contrails, something we've all seen for years. Happy hunting!
 
Best Regards, KF. Beswick kurt@oculusdesign.com
 
-- What is not on the page is sometimes more important than what is.
 
- KFB





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE