SIGHTINGS


 
Witches Brew Up Protest
For Barr Meeting
By Steve Visser
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
www.accessatlanta.com
6-2-99
 
 
Rep. Bob Barr preached to the choir at a town meeting Saturday, but he still contended with a chorus of witches in between the "amens" that favored banning Wiccan religion on military bases.
 
The Georgia Republican fielded questions from witches, Christians and other constituents in a packed room at a Cobb County library in Marietta. Barr criticized the commander of Fort Hood this month for allowing a Wiccan rite on the Texas Army base.
 
Wicca is a pagan, nature-centered religion, also known as witchcraft. It has tax-exempt status, as do mainstream religions, and is rooted in pre-Christian Europe.
 
"Are you afraid of witches?" Amber Maeve Szmanski of Acworth, a high priestess in the Grove of the Winged Scarab, asked between interruptions from Barr supporters. "Our Founding Fathers had more intelligence than to try to establish a state religion. . . . If you remove the Wiccan, who will be next on your list?"
 
Barr told the crowd of 120 that Wicca threatened to erode military discipline--a fear not uttered publicly by military commanders--and the First Amendment needed to take a back seat to that concern.
 
He favored the free exercise of Wicca in civilian life or by military personnel off their bases. He claimed officially sanctioning Wicca would open the door to other religious practices, such as peyote use by Native Americans. The Department of Defense is drawing up regulations to cover the use of the hallucinogenic drug, he said.
 
Barr would leave it to elected leaders to decide which religions could be practiced in the military, he said, adding that it wasn't unreasonable to ban Wicca services on a military base while permitting worship by Christians, Jews and Muslims.
 
"We are a nation that believes in God," he said. "It's on our money. It's on our documents."
 
Most of the audience supported Barr, who received a standing ovation and testimonials to his character. Several giggled at the Wiccans or tried to shout down those who protested Barr's letter to Fort Hood's commanding officer, Lt. Gen. Leon S. LaPorte, asking him to "stop this nonsense."
 
The Fort Hood celebration was described as a rite of spring marking the vernal equinox, with more than 50 witches, male and female, participating.
 
 
 
Commentary
James Neff/Webmaster
 
 
Barr represents the dissolution of constitutional values in the name of Reconstructionist Christianity, a mindset which seeks to define the 'God' inscribed on our money ("In God We Trust") as ONE specific deity of ONE specific religion, while simultaneously talking out of the other side of his mouth claiming to respect the constitution and freedom of religion.
 
When people like Barr say 'freedom of religion' they mean THEIR religion and only theirs. Have no delusions about this people -- there is a strong contingent in the radical religious right --- of whom I must say I am ashamed to call my spiritual brethren but are most definately my political enemies despite being considerably conservative myself --- who have one myopic goal: a man-imposed latter-day theocracy in America centered in their own twisted interpretation of the Judeo-Christian paradigm and the Bible (mostly a desire to establish Old Testament law); and it would only be a matter of time before the "judeo" element was next in line to be dissolved, believe me. Unwilling to wait on Christ to return to establish the 'everlasting kingdom' as promised in scripture, these men seek to establish it for themselves here and now, through political means. They do not heed scripture which states "we wrestle not with flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers in spiritual realms," and press on in earthy conquests; money, power, control. We all know the history of this madness. The earth is stained in blood for it.
 
Isn't it interesting that the same was true of Israel in the days of Jesus, when he spoke boldly about the carnal and earthly political structure which had abused the Hebrew religion and established a kingdom far flung from God's original intent or purposes in the Law.

In the parable of the Vineyard, Jesus describes a master who purchases a great vineyard and hires tenants to tend it while he is away in a far country. And upon being delayed, the master of the vineyard sent his servants, one by one, to retrieve the harvest. But each servant was killed by the evil tenants. So, the master said, "I will send my own Son. Surely they will respect him." But when they saw him coming, the conspired in their hearts and said "Let us kill the Son,who is the heir, and have the vineyard for ourselves." And they took the son outside the great hedge of the vineyard and put him to death. Jesus then asks the crowd listening to this parable, "What should be done with such evil tenants?" And they people shouted, "They should be put to a miserable death!" -- not realizing that Jesus was speaking of THEM -- but more potently, of the evil leaders who conspired to have the kingdom for themselves.

History repeats itself. Those who do not remember the lessons of the past, are doomed to repeat it. These men seek a theocratic system which would eventually destroy freedom of religion... and speech.. and assembly... and press, all in the name of God. It has been done before. Thankfully, it has always failed. My rights end where your rights begin, and vice versa; and in this we have a true democratic republic. But the last thing I want to see is a theocratic system run by sinful, fallible, evil men. Their track record tells me quite plainly, it cannot be done. My Bible tells me, it should not be done. Even one run by the best of men is a useless attempt to do what only Christ can, should, and in my pariticular faith, will do when he returns. But my neighbor's faith is his own; he is on his own spiritual journey and will fulfill his destiny, knowingly or unknowingly. Let him have that freedom, I say; so that if he discovers the love of my God, he has made his choices freely and without coercion. Jesus commanded his disciples to "go into all the world" baptizing, converting... he never mentions a theocratic conquest. rather, Jesus says, "wait. I am coming quickly, and my reward is with me." This is the calling of the called, the chosen and the faithful. Not greed for power and politicial controls. We are not called to legislate Christ, but pray for changed hearts, by God's Spirit. The same God who declares, "not by my might, nor by my power, but by my Spirit."
 
We must respect all religions, or none. Every man and woman must be free to seek and worship the God of their choosing, or no God or religion at all if that is their choice. Thomas Jefferson said, "Whether my neighbor has ten gods or one, it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." Jefferson may have personally viewed life through the prism of the Judeo-Christian value structure intensely, but it did not cloud his ability to be rational, or his wisdom in recalling the folly of the state recognizing one religion over another... the very cause to which North America was settled by those seeking religious freedom. Then, there was but one or two factions of Christianity to contend with. It was far less difficult regarding religious freedoms. Issues like prayer in schools or the ten commandments hanging in public places was simply not present. Today, in a vastly pluralistic society, there are dozens of gods worshiped, and along with them, dozens of religions contrary to the Judeo-Christian paradigm. All of these must be respected. "For where there is the Spirit of the Lord, there is liberty," scripture states. When the Apostle Paul went to speak on Mars Hill in Athens, did he lead a political rally? Did he oppose existing religious structures? Did he offend those around him, creating outcasts, distorting liberties? No. The Apostle Paul went to the place of debate -- the proper arena -- and addressed the thinkers and philosophers and public and said, "You men of Athens, I perceive that in all things you are very superstitious. For as I passed through your city, and beheld your religious devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, 'TO THE UNKNOWN GOD.' Whom therefore you worship without knowing, I now declare Him to you. The God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands... " And when Paul finished speaking, "And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked: and others said, We will hear you again on this matter. So Paul departed from among them."

He stated his case. He went his way. He did not march to the steps of the political powerstructure and start lobbying for change. He didn't tack the ten commandments in every place of learning or lie down in front of chariots carrying prostitutes to the temple. Paul regarded politics as folly. He sought a kingdom not of this world, but announced its coming in Jesus Christ. Mr. Barr and others in the radical religious right could stand a few more years in bible study, and do as Paul suggested: "Imitate me, as I imitate Christ."





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE