SIGHTINGS



Danger In School
Bus Seat Belts - Aircraft
Seats Being Upgraded
The Sander Report, Vol II, Issue CXI
By David M. Sander, Ph.D. <dmsander@ix.netcom.com>
9-22-99
 
 
 
DANGERS LURK IN SCHOOL BUS SEAT BELTS
 
The National Transportation Safety Board has concluded that school buses equipped with seat belts pose dangers to children. By holding a child's pelvis firmly in place, the belts allow the torso to crack like a whip -- with the child's head striking a seat back or a hard object with greater force than if the child's whole body had been thrown.
 
The board recommended instead that bus seats be redesigned. That could include arm rests, ceiling pads, making seat backs even higher, or molding the seats and seat backs to the human form and covering them with something less slippery. That, however, might reduce capacity to two children a seat, rather than three.
 
o The NTSB says that while lap belts are clearly a problem, lap-shoulder combinations are not much better.
 
o Only New York and New Jersey currently require seat belts on the buses.
 
o Florida and Louisiana will require their installation on new buses in a few years.
 
o California's legislature has just passed a school bus seat belt bill, but the state's governor has not said whether he will sign it or not.
 
School bus accidents produce only nine deaths a year in the U.S. Even with better protection against side impact accidents and rollovers, there would still be five or so deaths annually, experts say.
 
In fact, the low death rate has produced such a sketchy database that investigators could not find accidents involving belt- equipped buses to analyze. So they had to rely on computer models instead.
 
Source: Matthew L. Wald, "No Gain Seen in Seat Belts on School Bus," New York Times, September 22, 1999.
 
For NYT text http://search.nytimes.com/search/daily/bin/fastweb?getdoc+site+iib-site+181+ 0+wAAA+seat%7Ebelts
 
For NTSB report http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/1999/SIR9904.htm
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
 
FAA REGULATIONS CREATE ANOTHER PROBLEM
 
The Federal Aviation Administration has decreed that all aircraft certified since 1988 must install superstrong airline seats that won't break apart during a "survivable" crash. So at a cost of $5 billion over 10 years, all U.S. airlines are voluntarily retro-fitting their seats.
 
But this has generated a new problem. Many passengers face an additional danger: if the seat in front acts as a buffer, one's head suddenly becomes a 260-pound bowling ball on impact -- swinging it down to one's knees or even the floor.
 
So the airlines are having to spend another $600 million -- on top of a developmental cost of $25 million -- for airbags to cushion a crash shock when the new seats are installed.
 
Is the money, and the increase in fares it will prompt, justified?
 
o Of the 364 U.S. airline accidents between 1983 and 1996, 24 were deemed very serious by authorities and 17 were called "survivable."
 
o Of the 1,759 passengers on those 17 survivable flights, 78 percent survived, 15 percent died from blunt-trauma injuries, and five percent died from smoke inhalation or fire.
 
o Airbags or some other extra restraint may have helped save the 15 percent -- and some of the 5 percent may have gotten out if they hadn't been knocked out by the impact.
 
o So experts believe that the new airbags will save no more than 25 lives a year -- at a total cost of $5.6 billion.
 
Out of 700 million passengers who fly each year, only 160 persons lose their lives, on average.
 
Source: Howard Banks, "In for a Dime, in for $5.6 Billion," Forbes, October 4, 1999.
 
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
 
David M. Sander, Ph.D E-Mail: dmsander@ix.netcom.com Sander & Associates, Consultants Fax1: (916) 361-7281 2561 East Tiffany Lane Fax2: (916) 368-1080 Sacramento, CA 95827-1403 Phone: (916) 362-8433





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE