-
- Eleanor White's
<raven1@bestnet.org comments: Current,
late-90's electronic mind
control technology in the classified realm does
not require implants.
However, implants are still very significant for
two reasons:
-
- 1. Not all electronic
mind control perpetrators possess,
apparently, the implant-LESS
technology. This is evident from the fact
that several involuntary
implantees have had implants removed but not one
has ever been given
custody of the removed implant. Someone apparently
wants them kept out
of our hands.
-
- 2. Not every level of government even knows about implant-LESS
technology, and therefore, these non-privileged levels of government are
obvoiusly attracted to the degree of control which can be had by
implanting
populations. The following article makes that chillingly
clear!
_____
-
- Gov. Gary Johnson has hopes that rapidly advancing
computer
technology someday could help solve the problem of New
Mexico's overcrowded
prisons.
-
- Much to the dismay of inmate
lawyers, Johnson at a private
meeting in May [1999] raised the
possibility that a futuristic form of
incarceration could include
implanting microchips in convicted felons.
-
- Johnson made the comments
during an informal meeting
with the chief federal judge in New Mexico,
top state corrections officials,
and lawyers involved in an 18-year-old
lawsuit over prison conditions,
according to three people who attended
the gathering.
-
- Johnson said during an interview this week that he wasn't
implying the state could implement such a program anytime soon. But, he
said, with "the technology advancing all the time, we're going to
have in the future to ... be able to implement innovative ways of parole
and work release."
-
- Peter Cubra, one of the lawyers representing inmates
in the prison lawsuit testified about the remarks earlier this month at
the Legislature's Interim Courts, Corrections, and Criminal Justice
Committee.
Cubra didnt' divulge where Johnson made the comments, but
two ...
-
- [TEXT MISSING FROM PHOTOCOPY]
-
- According to Cubra,
Johnson responded by saying technology
is evolving to the point that
microchip implants WOULD be performed, and
someday would be relatively
inexpensive.
-
- "What the governor literally said ... was, he took
his
index finger and thumb and held them about a half an inch apart and
he
said 'We are this closeto the time when we will have microchips avialable'
and then he took his left hand, took it to his temple and said 'AND WE
CAN INSERT THE MICROCHIPS INTO PEOPLE'S BRAINS AND CONTROL THEIR BEHAVIOR
THAT WAY'" Cubra told the legislative committee Aug. 18 in
Albuquerque.
-
- Apparently it wasn't the first time Johnson made such
remarks.
-
- People who attended the Santa Fe meeting said Johnson
mentioned
that he had raised the issue during his campaign for governor.
After
Johnson's statements in May [1999] those in the room were stunned,
said
Cubra and another person at the meeting.
-
- However a third person who
attended but refused to be
identified said the governor was obviously
joking.
-
- A
spokesman for Conway said Thursday that the judge wouldn't
comment on
any matter related to pending litigation. Cubra brought up
Johnson's
remarks urging the legislative committee to take the lead in
setting
prison policy. "This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever
heard, he said.
-
- He told the committee "it appeared the executive
branch
didn't have any realistic attitudes about it. A spokeswoman for
the
governor said last week that Johnson was speaking in "very broad
terms" when he mentioned the microchip concept.
-
- "He said he was talking
very broadly, very future-oriented,
like what are the technologies that
are being developed for prisoners,
what applications in general for new
technology might there be" said
Catherine Bedell, a deputy chief
of staff.
-
- Asked Whether Johnson has any specific proposals, she
said,
"not yet" and referred further questions to Corrections
Secretary Karl Sannicks.
-
- Sannicks, through a spokesman, said he hadn't heard
about
microchips being used on prisoners and "it probably would be
something
he would not implement."
-
- When asked about the May
meeting, Johnson said Wednesday
"I was talking about bracelets and
being able to track felons out
of jail, that that technology is going
to exist if it doesn't exist already.
-
- "But it's going to exist
in an affordable state
and that may revol- utionize parole, that may
revolutionize incarceration
as far as we know it. In that context,
that technology certainly is in
the future, is going to play a role in
parole, in incarceration, and work
release."
-
- Asked whether he specifically
brought up microchips,
Johnson said, "Well, talking about
microprocessors, the advance in
microprocessors, again, that is
technology in essence."
-
- Dr. Michael Hollifield, director of the Special Problems
Clinic at the University of New Mexico medical school, said HE KNEW OF
NO RESEARCH ANYWHERE IN THE COUNTRY ON THE USE OF MICROCHIPS TO CONTROL
HUMAN BEHAVIOR. [Eleanor White's comment: CROCK]
-
- "There's a lot of myth and
innuendo about this stuff"
Hollifield said.
-
- Hollifield's clinic offers
short term cognitive and behavioral
therapies for psychiatric
disorders.
|
