SIGHTINGS



Deepak Chopra Says
Woman Tried To Extort
$50,000 In Hush Money
By Anne Krueger
San Deigo Tribune - Staff Writer
http://www.uniontribune.com/news/uniontrib/wed/metro/news_2m1chopra.html
12-1-99

 
It shapes up as one of San Diego's strangest lawsuits: a case that involves internationally known writer and mind-body healer Deepak Chopra and allegations of greed, illicit sex and stolen garbage.
 
Chopra is suing a woman he alleges tried to blackmail him for $50,000 in return for not exposing allegations that Chopra had trysts with a prostitute, which Chopra denies.
 
Chopra, who was born in India and now lives in La Jolla, has gained an international following for his beliefs that awareness of the mind-body connection can facilitate healing and lead to inner peace. He is taking a break from the lecture circuit to attend the four-week trial.
 
He sat attentively in court yesterday as his attorney, Carla DiMare, outlined Chopra's case.
 
DiMare said that Joyce Weaver, who worked with Chopra, tried to blackmail him and falsely contended that Chopra had sexually harassed her.
 
"She keeps going after him even though she knows the story is false because she wants money," DiMare said.
 
The lawyer said that attorneys from Gray, Cary, Ware and Freidenrich -- the city's largest private law firm -- demanded $1 million from Chopra to avoid filing of a lawsuit by Weaver in which she contended that he sexually harassed her.
 
Chopra was forced to file a lawsuit against Weaver to end her efforts to destroy his reputation, DiMare said.
 
During a break in the court proceedings, Chopra said he filed the lawsuit "as a matter of principle" to protect his reputation.
 
"I don't feel any hostility (toward Weaver)," he said. "I just feel that blackmail shouldn't be allowed."
 
Weaver's attorney, Peter Friesen, said Chopra did not file his lawsuit against Weaver until after she had filed a claim against him accusing him of sexual harassment. Friesen said that before Chopra made the allegation in his lawsuit he never told any of his business associates of his contention that Weaver tried to blackmail him.
 
Weaver was an employee of the Sharp Center for Mind-Body Medicine, an institute for alternative medicine associated with Chopra that was owned by Sharp HealthCare.
 
Friesen said Weaver worked with Chopra and helped plan some of the seminars he conducted on his alternative medicine theories.
 
DiMare said Weaver stalked Chopra and constantly wanted to be near him. He dismissed her as an emotionally unstable woman, DiMare said.
 
"Ms. Weaver is a very, very angry woman and she was particularly angry at Dr. Chopra because he wasn't paying attention to her," DiMare said.
 
But Friesen contended that Weaver and Chopra had a close working relationship until spring 1994 when Chopra made sexual advances toward Weaver and she resisted him.
 
In June 1995, Judy Bangert, identified in court as a former prostitute, called the center where Weaver worked and contended that she had had sex with Chopra. Weaver taped a voice mail message from Bangert left on the telephone of one of Chopra's colleagues.
 
DiMare said Weaver approached Chopra three times offering not to go to the media with the information about Bangert if Chopra paid her $50,000. Friesen denied that any blackmail attempts occurred.
 
In September 1995, a private investigator was caught taking six to 10 bags of trash from the Del Mar offices of one of Chopra's attorneys, Michael Flynn, a partner in DiMare's law firm.
 
DiMare said the Gray, Cary law firm gave legal advice to the investigator. Three weeks after the trash was stolen, Weaver hired attorneys from Gray, Cary to represent her in her sexual harassment case against Chopra. The firm then hired the investigator who had stolen the trash to work on Weaver's case, DiMare said.
 
Friesen downplayed the trash incident, saying it was later shown that the person who stole the trash had no connection to the case against Chopra. He said Weaver did not contact the Gray, Cary law firm until two months after the trash was stolen.
 
Weaver's sexual harassment claim against Chopra has since been thrown out of court. But she still has claims in her lawsuit against Chopra of retaliation and wrongful termination.
 
DiMare said Weaver took a stress-disability leave from her job in December 1995 and lost her job as part of a massive layoff at Sharp in May 1996.
 
The jurors who will decide Chopra's claims against Weaver will also be asked to decide on her allegations that Chopra retaliated against her when she filed her sexual harassment claim against him.
 
DiMare said Weaver contacted a reporter for The Weekly Standard magazine, which published an article in 1996 about the allegations concerning a tryst between Chopra and the prostitute. Friesen said Weaver never talked to the reporter until after the article was published.
 
The Standard later published a retraction of its story, and Chopra won a settlement of more than $1 million from the publication, DiMare said.
 
Friesen told jurors that there is evidence to support the allegations about Chopra and the prostitute. He said that credit card receipts made out to the woman appear to have been signed by Chopra and that Chopra's contention that the credit card was used by a personal assistant does not appear to be credible.
 
DiMare told jurors that Chopra has had to pay more than $1 million to protect himself from Weaver's allegations and that Chopra's reputation has been harmed.
 
"The damage has been done and the damage has been enormous," DiMare said
 
Copyright 1999 Union-Tribune Publishing Co.


SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE

This Site Served by TheHostPros