-
- We all know that is, in fact the case, don't we?
-
- Yes. We've known that for a very long time, indeed.
-
- What does that mean to us on the 36th anniversary of
the assassination of President Kennedy? Why are the records not released
in full? What does the statement: -- "Those files are postponed in
full for reasons of National Security" -- ... actually mean?
-
- If those files contained evidence, in support of the
"official version" -- then exactly "which Nation's Security
is being assured" by the continued classification of these "innocuous"
documents?
-
- Not mine.
-
- For those of us in the JFK Assassination Research Community,
the events of November 22, 1963 -- do NOT exist in a vacuum. They exist
in the "present tense" but, they belong in the past. Until we
can write the "true history" of those events, our history will
remain in a state of flux; ever evolving into what the media can get us
to agree to accept.
-
- Is the time required to investigate the life history
of OSWALD, time well spent? Will we find clues to the real culprits by
studying the "records" on this man? Records which either prove
his guilt -- (of course why hide them if that is true?), or they prove
his innocence. Are we perhaps playing into the hands of the cabal who
"created a patsy" for this very purpose, (details be damned)?
-
- I do not ask these questions frivolously or to be argumentative
in any way, but rather for clarification.
-
- Since almost all of us agree that OSWALD did not act
alone, why is that not enough? Most of the "in-fighting" occurring
amongst JFK researchers is not as a result of any disagreement on that
most fundamental issue, namely: the OSWALD story -- as the Warren Commission
Reported it -- is nothing more than fiction.
-
- The in-fighting is due to the constant debate over the
details of "the how" (not the "if") a conspiracy
-- was responsible for murdering the 35th President. Some believe the
Zapruder film is a hoax, AND obviously they also believe there exists a
conspiracy. Others believe the film is authentic AND most of them STILL
believe there exists a conspiracy. Some believe there are at least two
OSWALDS, AND they obviously also believe there exists a conspiracy. Others
do not believe, have grave doubts, or are just undecided if -- there was
more than one OSWALD, but STILL-- they too, believe there exists a conspiracy.
-
- Should we perhaps refrain from researching OSWALD? I
do not mean to say that the subject was never important, but that the research
which has already been done in this regard has not affected the "collective
awareness" of the people, no matter how strong or weak the evidence
discovered has been.
-
- Finally, the "politicians" and others in government
DO NOT need convincing! They already are absolutely POSITIVE that a conspiracy
exists! Why? Because, that is, by its very nature, a PRIMARY ingredient
required for a coup d'etat to be a success. Such a violent takeover is
not supposed to be a temporary thing, rather it is carefully orchestrated
to last indefinitely. That's why those remaining within the surviving "political
structure" are made to know that a "power-base" exists;
that it is responsible for the coup; and that it is in CONTROL. No lone
nut, at all. The knowledge that those who would resist this power-base
are under the same guns as were JFK, RFK, & MLK, stays the hand of
our elected Representatives to this day...
-
- "If the politicians really believed that a lone
nut was responsible, this would still be a Nation of, by, and for 'We The
People' -- but, they don't believe it either..."
-
- The Lone Nut Theory is designed to fool the people not
the politicians...
-
- For if the people were to refuse to accept it, they would
rise up and take their country back. Then the "power-base" would
cease to exist.
-
- When the truth is finally admitted [that]: "Yes,
there was a conspiracy" -- and it will be admitted, the operative
word in the admission will be, WAS -- past tense.
-
- And if 'we the people' simply accept it, then darker
days than we've ever imagined, shall be upon us...
-
-
- Greg Burnham
-
- _____
-
- An excerpt from Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty...
-
- "Since World War II, there have been hundreds of
"coups d'etats" - a euphemism for assassination. That list will
grow as long as the United States does its diplomatic work clandestinely.
Why else did Henry Kissinger 'shuttled' from country to country in the
Middle East? If his relationship with each of these countries is an undercover
relationship, then he cannot meet with them publicly and in a group.
-
- "Eventually, practitioners of assassination by the
removal of power reach the point where they see that technique as fit for
the removal of opposition anywhere."
-
- That was why President Kennedy was killed.
-
- "He was not murdered by some lone, gunman or by
some limited conspiracy, but by the breakdown of the protective system
that should have made an assassination impossible.
-
- "Once insiders knew that he would not be protected,
it was easy to pick the day and the place. In fact, those responsible for
luring Kennedy to Dallas on November 22, 1963 were not even in on the plan
itself. He went to Texas innocuously enough: to dedicate an Air Force
hospital facility at Brooks Air Force Base in San Antonio. It was not too
difficult then to get him to stop at Fort Worth - 'to mend political fences.'
-
- "Of course, no good politician would go to Fort
Worth and skip Dallas. All the conspirators had to do was to let the right
'mechanics' know where Kennedy would be and when and, most importantly,
that the usual precautions would not have been made and that escape would
be facilitated. This is the greatest single clue to that assassination.
-
- "Who had the power to call off or drastically reduce
the usual security precautions that always are in effect whenever a president
travels? Castro did not kill Kennedy, nor did the CIA. The power source
that arranged that murder was on the inside. It had the means to reduce
normal security and permit the choice of a hazardous route. It also has
had the continuing power to cover up that crime for [36] years."
-
- Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty, USAF [ret.]
|
