-
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 09:49:22 -1000
- To: eotl@west.net
- From: Dick Allgire <allgired001@hawaii.rr.com
- Subject: FLIGHT 261 "Weapons Test"
-
- Immediately after the crash of Alaska Fl. 261 there was
an article on the abcnews.com website which quoted a Navy pilot. The article
stated something to the effect that the pilot "... was preparing for
a weapons test..."
-
- I did not download the artcle at that time, but I remember
thinking to myself, Hmm weapons test? After I noticed the articles about
flight 261 on your website I went back to abcnews.com and did a search
to find the article which mentioned the weapons test at Point Mugu. It
has disappeared.
-
- Does anyone else remember seeing this? Can anyone find
it, or did anyone save it? _____
-
-
- Delivered-To: eotl@west.net
- X-Originating-IP:
- From: (on file)
- To: eotl@west.net
- Subject: MD-83 Crash off of the Ventura Coast
- Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2000 06:56:37 GMT
-
- I am an engineer who drives from xxx to Thousand Oaks
every day. I drive home from TO towards Ventura every M-F at 4:00.
-
- I saw the aftermath of the plane getting hit.
-
- The Navy was launching several boat-to-air missiles EXACTLY
at this time(4:25-4:40). They were off the coast of the Ventura Harbor.
(Much further North than usual for this activity...which I've witnessed
in the past.)
-
- I am sure many, many, many people had to have seen these
launchings (I could not POSSIBLY be the only person on the Northbound 101
to have noticed this. I saw the weird rainbow effect of (rocket propellent?)
that is usually present after (Pt). Mugu testing in the sky.
-
- I did not learn of the crash until getting home and listening
to the radio for a few minutes. I honestly believe that this plane was
accidentally shot down by Naval Warfare Testing.
-
- I have also been taking photos of contrail/chemtrail
activity in Ventura since Christmas. I ALSO have photos of PT Mugu testing
only a couple of weeks ago. I think it would be prudent to try to gather
witnesses who saw these launches. No one can fight this alone.
-
- I swear that all of the above is true and factual. I
think these statements can be proven if you do a little research.
-
- (name on file)
- _____
-
-
- From KGB <katydid@together.net
- To: <eotl@west.net
- Subject: Flight 261
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000
-
- I was present at Point Mugu Naval Air Station in the
spring of 1987 when a surface to air missile intended to hit a drone F-4
missed and wizzed passed a commercial B-727 by less than 1000ft. I was
in the base commanders office when the shit hit the fan, spin controll
went into play and the near hit was brushed under the rug. Today, I am
a Pilot.
-
- _____
-
-
- Comment
-
- Delivered-To: eotl@west.net
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 02:08:46 -0500
- From: AC <stitt@lcc.net
- To: eotl@west.net
- Subject: FAA STABILIZER MALFUNCTION REQUIREMENTS
-
-
- What an interesting commentary on CNN, tonight.
-
- Seems that the FAA, in light of the stabilizer problems[?]
on AS261, is thinking about changing its requirements for what should happen
when a stabilizer trim malfunction event occurs. Apparently, I have gotten
it accurately. This kind of a problem has been regarded as so manually
overridable that the FAA only requires that the problem be rectified at
the next station: the FAA has not considered this trim problem as warranting
'mayday' emergency vector landing problems.
-
- But the real question should be, how does the FAA intend
to remedy the problem of commercial airliners flying into military weapons
testing zones, which overlap commercial air traffic?
-
- SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE
- This
Site Served by TheHostPros
|