SIGHTINGS


 
Cold Fusion - Ten Years
Of Revolutionary
Science & Technology
By Dr. Eugene F. Mallove
Editor-in-Chief
Infinite Energy Magazine
3-23-99
 
Infinite Energy Magazine publishes Tenth Anniversary Issue - Includes a "Special Report: MIT and Cold Fusion"
 
The news about cold fusion from the University of Utah on March 23, 1989 was greeted with astonishment worldwide. Drs. Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons had claimed that an electrochemical cell with heavy water electrolyte and a palladium cathode gave rise to so much excess energy that the mysterious phenomenon had to be nuclear, and was probably a process related to nuclear fusion. Many scientists quickly took sides for or against cold fusion-mostly against. By the end of the summer of 1989 the "experts" claimed cold fusion didn't exist. They said it was an experimental error and could not be reproduced. Actually, the story had barely begun. Provocative research never ended. Cold fusion was and is very much alive, and has been confirmed in hundreds of experiments performed in many countries. The current issue of Infinite Energy magazine lists the top thirty-four papers and their provocative scientific conclusions that substantiate a broad class of cold fusion phenomena. Significant commercial efforts are underway toward developing this revolutionary new clean energy source and the other discoveries it inspired. The new field of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)-nuclear transmutation at low energy-has been born.
 
On the Tenth Anniversary of the Cold Fusion announcement, Infinite Energy magazine clarifies one of the most intense controversies in the history of science with its Special Tenth Anniversary of Cold Fusion Issue (128 pages). Many cold fusion scientists, including pioneer Dr. Martin Fleischmann, provide their views of the past decade and the future of cold fusion. The Anniversary Issue also features a fifty-five page Special Report: MIT and Cold Fusion. This meticulously documented report proves that the U.S. Department of Energy's rush-to-judgment negative report in 1989 relied, in part, on a highly flawed cold fusion experiment performed at the MIT Plasma Fusion Center. Hot fusion scientists there feared loss of their continued Federal support if cold fusion gained currency. The MIT PFC conducted a so-called "negative" experiment that was first to be cited by the U.S. Department of Energy in its influential, disastrous report.
 
Dr. Eugene F. Mallove, MIT graduate and Editor-in-Chief of Infinite Energy, who wrote the Special Report, concludes: "The energy and environmental future of the world hung in the balance-and the MIT Plasma Fusion Center people failed us. They preferred to get rid of a scientific claim in which they did not believe, and which threatened their federally funded program, by playing politics with the media, trivializing their experiments, and ultimately foisting on the world highly flawed data-some would say fraudulently represented data-from a calorimetry experiment ostensibly performed to determine scientific truth." Mallove implicates MIT President Charles M. Vest and others of participating in an unconscionable whitewash of serious scientific misconduct that occurred on a federally funded research project. #END#
 
Editors and Journalists: If you would like to receive a copy of this issue of Infinite Energy, please contact us.
 
 
Infinite Energy Magazine
P.O. Box 2816, Concord, NH 03302-2816
Ph: 603-228-4516 Fx: 603-224-5975
e-mail: editor@infinite-energy.com
http://www.infinite-energy.com





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE