SIGHTINGS


 
Stonehenge Was Built
By The French! - New Book
By Jennifer Viegas
www.discovery.com
4-12-99
 
An upcoming book by a leading stone circle scholar claims that Stonehenge, Britain's famous prehistoric stone monument, was built, at least in part, by the French, using materials obtained at the site.
 
The theory unhinges the widely held belief that locals transported bluestones from Wales to construct the magnificent megalith.
 
According to "Great Stone Circle," to be released in May, Stonehenge was erected in Salisbury, England, during three separate building phases between 3500 B.C. to 1520 B.C. Archaeologists generally agree that early Britons established the monument's outer circle, over the first two phases, utilizing nearby gray sarsen stones. The third, and final, phase, though, has a rockier history.
 
Aubrey Burl, former principal lecturer in archaeology at Hull College in England and author of the book, says Brittons probably built the circle's inner horseshoe of bluestone trilithons at that time.
 
"The horseshoe configuration is quite rare in England, but is abundant in Brittany," explains Burl. "Carvings on the stone of axes, daggers, crooks and anthropomorphs are typical of Breton art, but are nothing like the abstract carvings usually found in England and Ireland."
 
The carved bluestones originated in the Preseli mountains of Wales, 140 miles west of Stonehenge. The traditional view is that men laboriously transported the heavy stones to the site. Burl disagrees.
 
"The route would have been dangerous and unmanageable," he says. "Besides, the bluestones at Stonehenge are a rag bag of rubbish and are not the result of careful selection by individuals prospecting for stone."
 
Instead, Burl says a glacier carried the stones to southern England during the ice age. He points to evidence that bluestones existed in Salisbury before Stonehenge.
 
"A bluestone, approximately one thousand years older than Stonehenge, was found in the region at a burial mound known as Boles Barrow," he says. "It is now in Salisbury Museum."
 
John Rick, professor of anthropological sciences at Stanford, doubts glaciation transported the stones.
 
"A glacier would likely have brought in more stones," says Rick. "A major ice sheet would have had to travel an unusual linear path across flatland from Wales. I don't think there's proof yet that this occurred."
 
Rick, however, believes the French connection to Stonehenge is plausible.
 
"There is no question that similar monuments are found in Brittany," says Rick.





SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE