SIGHTINGS



Death Factories -
The Biology Of Doom
Review By Timothy Naftali - From The NY Times
http://www10.nytimes.com/books/00/01/23/reviews/000123.23naftalt.html
 
 
The Biology Of Doom
The History of America's Secret Germ Warfare Project
By Ed Regis
259 pp. New York: Henry Holt & Company. $25.

 
The impure salts that turned Dr. Henry Jekyll into Mr. Edward Hyde did not prescribe themselves. In Robert Louis Stevenson's famous story, it is the scientist and not science that is the villain. ''Man is not truly one,'' the doomed Jekyll lamented, ''but truly two.'' Real-life Dr. Jekylls lurk in the background of Ed Regis' ''Biology of Doom: The History of America's Secret Germ Warfare Project.'' The science behind biological warfare is the evil flip side of the search for vaccines and cures. Military use of pathogens is as old as human conflict. But it is in the 20th century that biological warfare became an industry.
 
For once the Nazis are not primarily to blame. It was imperial Japan that inspired the modern biological arms race. In 1938, Japanese scientists began moving into Ping Fan, a walled city 20 miles south of Harbin in occupied China. Within two years, the Anti-Epidemic Water Supply and Purification Bureau, or Unit 731, employed 3,000 people at scores of laboratories. At Ping Fan, Japanese scientists pioneered the mass production of pathogens and worked on delivery mechanisms. By October 1940, Japanese planes dropped a mixture of grains and fleas over Chinese towns, causing two major outbreaks of bubonic plague south of Shanghai.
 
The British, concerned that whatever Tokyo could do Berlin could do better, were the first to try to set up a biological warfare program of their own. In December 1941 they acquired Gruinard Island in the Scottish highlands and over the next few years dropped bombs filled with anthrax spores over the heads of oblivious sheep, who then died as expected. As in many other areas of modern national defense -- intelligence gathering, commando operations -- the Americans started behind the British, learned from them and because of huge national resources ultimately surpassed them. But it was the cold war, and fears of Soviet biological weapons, not World War II, that gave rise to an American biological arsenal. And once again the Japanese played a significant role. There were rumors that the scientists at Ping Fan had experimented on human beings, and in 1947 the Soviets exerted pressure on the United States to put them on trial. Maj. Gen. Shiro Ishii, whom American intelligence had found living under an assumed name in Japan, finally admitted his crimes.
 
In all, Unit 731 killed about 850 ''patients.'' ''The human subjects,'' one American study later concluded ''were used in exactly the same manner as other experimental animals.'' The Japanese discovered, for instance, that if you put 10 people in a room infested with 20 plague-bearing fleas per square meter, 4 would die of plague. Anthrax had a better mortality rate (80 percent to 90 percent, Ishii said) but the plague diffused better. The most frightening agent the Japanese tested was Songo fever, like Ebola, the star of ''The Hot Zone,'' a hemorrhagic fever.
 
''The Biology of Doom'' is thought-provoking in spite of itself. Regis' goal seems to be to disprove Soviet and Chinese claims that the United States used biological weapons in the Korean War. In this he succeeds. As this institutional history shows, the United States acquired an operational biological weapons capacity only after the end of the Korean War. The United States Air Force included a biological warfare annex to its plans for general war as early as 1950; but until 1954, it did not have the refrigeration capability, let alone enough of any kind of bug, to perform this feat anywhere. The Army, meanwhile, completed its first biological production plant only in December 1953. Nor has any researcher yet found tactical plans for biological warfare in the Far East in the 1950's. In fact, Regis says, there is no evidence of any American military use of biological weapons in the cold war; work to perfect them continued until late 1969, when President Richard Nixon ordered a halt.
 
Regis, the author of four previous books, including ''Who Got Einstein's Office?,'' understands the critical difference between plans and operations. But in focusing on what the United States did not do in battle, he misses the larger implications of his story. Shiro Ishii and his associates received immunity from prosecution in return for giving the United States Army 15,000 slides of specimens from more than 500 human cases of diseases caused by biological agents, and in the 1950's and 60's, the government sponsored covert tests, using the apparently harmless microbes Serratia marcescens (SM) and Bacillus globigii (BG), to simulate the spread of deadly anthrax over large populations. In April 1950, two Navy ships -- without, it seems, the knowledge of Congress -- sprayed the residents of the Virginia coastal communities of Norfolk, Hampton and Newport News with BG. Later that year, 800,000 people around San Francisco Bay were exposed to clouds of these microbes. Regis found evidence of 200 similar tests all over the country. In the most bizarre, in June 1966, soldiers in plain clothes dropped light bulbs filled with BG on New York City subway tracks, and the trains pulled the cloud of biological agents throughout the subway system. Then men with suitcase samplers strolled among unsuspecting New York subway riders to test the amount of spread.
 
Arguably, these were defensive operations to determine the vulnerability of American cities to attack. Regis also describes how human beings were also used to test offensive agents. Between 1955 and 1969, 2,200 Seventh-day Adventists in the American military volunteered to be infected with scores of diseases from equine encephalitis to Rocky Mountain spotted fever. ''The type of voluntary service which is being offered to our boys,'' the Army sponsors wrote, ''offers an excellent opportunity for these young men to render a service which will be of value not only to military medicine but to public health generally.''
 
It is customary to blame governments for these industries of death. But one also has to wonder about the individual scientists. A compelling book, for which Regis did the research, would have examined the morality and motivations of the men behind biological weapons. Henry Jekyll blamed self-indulgence for the shipwreck of his life. What prompted these American scientists to feed the Hydes of their souls?
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Timothy Naftali is director of the Presidential Recordings Project at the University of Virginia's Miller Center of Public Affairs. He is working on a history of American counterespionage during World War II and the cold war
 
 
Comment
 
 
How To 'Cover' The US BioWarfare Program
 
From Brasscheck <ken@brasscheck.com 1-27-00
 
 
When I saw that Ed Regis had dedicated his book "The Biology of Doom" to right wing ideologue in technophile's clothing Kevin Kelly, the founding editor of Wired Magazine, I realized I was probably going to be in for a treat of sorts.
 
My first impression of Regis' book is that it followed the formula used by his colleague Stewart Brand in his whitewash of Ithiel de Sola Pool, the head of the CIA funded Center for International Studies at MIT: 1) share lots of "inside" secrets, 2) lionize the scientists and the challenges of their cutting edge work, and 3) make sure readers don't get within ten miles of the real facts of the story. (See Brand's "The Media Lab")
 
It's an ideal con. First, most importantly, the writer gets paid. Second, one's reputation as a science writer is reinforced. Third, if one ever gets called on the fact that they left out essential facts, they can, and do, fall back on the excuse that "well, that wasn't part of my focus."
 
The technical term for this is disinformation. Or Stewart Brand and Ed Regis and their pals at Wired are just lucky idiots. Idiots who happen to stumble into producing works that gloss over facts that are inconvenient to those who have the means and motives to make them disappear. Take your pick. Idiots or hacks. I will grant them this. They are good at what they do and extremely consistent.
 
Fortunately in the case of Regis' book, the review of a reputable historian published in the New York Times deals with the core "flaw" in his account of the US biowarfare program so I don't have to be the instigator of a "conspiracy theory."
 
Here's the pertinent quote from Timothy Naftali's New York Times review:
 
"The Biology of Doom'' is thought-provoking in spite of itself. Regis' goal seems to be to disprove Soviet and Chinese claims that the United States used biological weapons in the Korean War..."
 
As I've pointed out elsewhere, Regis' book is remarkable in that it offers itself as a cold war history of US biowarfare efforts, yet it somehow manages to miss the 1980s program that sent substantial biowar technology to then US ally Iraq. The cold war was still hot when we were sending West Nile Fever and Anthrax to our good buddy Saddam Hussein. How could Regis have left this out? Does this intelligent man believe that the fact that these weapons technologies were sent to Iraq via Department of Agriculture and Commerce Department programs mean that the military was not involved?
 
But Regis' packaging of the US biowar story has a far more serious flaw. His account grossly understates the extent of a key source for the US program: Japanese biowarfare research and tactics during the years leading up yo and including World War II.
 
About 850 people were killed by the Japanese research program, he says. To adapt a phrase from Steve Jobs: "This is INSANELY inaccurate."
 
To appreciate what a huge distortion this is, let's read some excerpts from a widely circulated book issued by a well established publisher which specializes in Japanese subject for English speaking readers, Tuttle:
 
Here's a description of the Pingfang biowarfare complex from Hal Gold's book "Unit 731 Testimony" (emphasis mine):
 
"The air space over the area was off limits...
 
The Pingfang complex would grow into a sprawling walled CITY of more than SEVENTY BUILDINGS on a SIX SQUARE KILOMETER tract of land...
 
Pingfang was equipped for disposing of its consumed human lab materials with three large incinerators...
 
(There was) an airfield built off to one side of the building complex within the unit grounds...Doctors who knew the situation at the time have commented that the Tokyo-Pingfang air corridor was run on a very regular basis...
 
In addition to the Pingfang central unit, there were units set up in Beijing, Nanjing, Guangzhou, and Singapore. In addition, some of these units had their own branch units. The total number of personnel reached TWENTY THOUSAND people."
 
This operation ran from 1939 until the end of the war yet Regis tells his readers they killed about 850 people.
 
One officer alone admitted that his unit, which was one of many that was charged with rounding up Chinese victims, was personally involved in the murder of at least 3,000 people. Pingfang had its own train line that brought victims to the labs night and day. No hard data exists, but the victims surely numbered in the tens of thousands. I leave it to you to read the eye witness accounts in Gold's book to learn the various ways in which they were murdered. I'll tell you this. You better have a strong stomach. It makes accounts of Nazi concentration camps look like Red Cross work.
 
It's interesting to note that the US military was profoundly active in the cover up of the Pingfang story and stood by while the atrocity's engineers were elevated to high positions in Occupied Japan. The reason: it wanted access to the mountains of research data and know how generated by this horror. Think of that. Not a word of this huge and evil enterprise was reported to the world, or to to Japanese citizens for that matter, yet the US military had all the evidence. (Some info finally did come out 50 years later.)
 
As for Regis' claim that the US military lacked the means to wage biowarfare in Korea, anyone knowing the facts of the Japanese program knows that this is ludicrous in the extreme. The US received the entire Japanese biowarfare machine (men, materials, and infrastructure) from Japan after the war. That's why it was essential that the extent of the Japanese operations in China be hidden from the world. And, by the way, the attacks the Chinese and Koreans say were launched on them by the US were entirely consistent with biowafare tactics used by the Japanese.
 
The timing of Regis' interest in "covering" the US biowarfare story is noteworthy.
 
Starting in 1993, there was an explosion of material released on this topic in Japan. A traveling exhibit on the subject visited sixty one Japanese cities provoking dozens of participants to come forward and confess the details of their involvement. How could a "thoroughly researched" book on the history of the US biowarfare program miss this or fail to address these accounts? It's hard work, I guess, but somebody's got to do it.
 
One last point Naftali raises in his review that is worth considering:
 
"A compelling book, for which Regis did the research, would have examined the morality and motivations of the men behind biological weapons."
 
I can almost hear the patented dismissive snickering of Regis, Kelly, Brand, Peter Schwartz and the rest of the Wired crew at this demonstration of naivete. The whole point of the output of these individuals has been to strip considerations of morality from the technological wet dreams of the military and big business. One has only to thumb through a few issues of Wired to see that. "Morality? What's that? We're all about progress and science. We we check our moral concerns at the door."
 
Along with the facts too.
 
 
Post script: A little known fact is that Wired was bankrolled virtually from its first issue by the Newhouse family which eventually swallowed it after they bungled their IPO.
 
Newhouse gave us Ronald Reagan's second term. After the disastrous first debate with Mondale in which the public got its first uncensored look at the extent of Reagan's mental impairments, Roy Cohn called the campaign on behalf of the family offering its services.
 
Within a week there was a photoshoot at the Santa Barbara ranch showing Reagan cutting wood and riding horses. It was the cover story of the very next issue of Parade Magazine, the insert that appears in tens of millions of Sunday newspaper across the country.
 
Ed Rollins, now a flack for the Chinese, then a Reagan campaign strategist, recounts the story proudly in his autobiography.
 
 
============================================== Brass Check - http://www.brasscheck.com
 
"...if only the press were to do its duty, or but a tenth of its duty, this hellish system could not go on." - William Cobbett, Rural Rides, 1830
 
"He who knows best knows how little he knows." - Thomas Jefferson ===========================================


SIGHTINGS HOMEPAGE

This Site Served by TheHostPros