- The US military is trying to start a war with Iran, and
they have been caught trying to use the UK to do the dirty work for them.
-
- In July last year the US military commander in Iraq ordered
thousands of British troops to launch a full-scale attack on Iranian positions
at the border with Iran. If the British commander had not broken the chain
of command by blocking the orders, it is likely that the allies would now
be at war with Iran.
-
- The US has tried to use the UK to trigger conflicts in
the past. Last time, during the Balkans war in the 1990s, the British commander,
Gen Jackson, refused to attack Russian positions, and is quoted as protesting:
"I am not going to start World War Three for you." The US could
have engaged the enemy themselves on both occasions when the UK refused,
but apparently they would prefer to wait until somebody else is stupid
enough to do the dirty-work for them.
-
- A recent open memorandum published by the Project for
the New American Century under the title "Regime Change for Iran"
makes it clear what the agenda is for Iran. PNAC is a powerful group which
claims to "advise" the US government on policy and strategy,
but its members actually happen to be the decision-makers themselves.
-
- Iran is currently surrounded by American and British
forces on both sides, with US-occupied Iraq on its Western border and US-occupied
Afghanistan on its Eastern border.
-
- http://www.theinsider.org/mailing/article.asp?id=0513
-
-
- SOURCES
-
- Attack Iran, US Chief Ordered British
- The Daily Telegraph - UK
- 7-3-4
-
- America's military commander in Iraq ordered British
troops to prepare a full-scale ground offensive against Iranian forces
that had crossed the border and grabbed disputed territory, a senior officer
has disclosed.
-
- An attack would almost certainly have provoked open conflict
with Iran. But the British chose instead to resolve the matter through
diplomatic channels.
-
- "If we had attacked the Iranian positions, all hell
would have broken loose," a defence source said yesterday.
-
- "We would have had the Iranians to our front and
the Iraqi insurgents picking us off at the rear."
- The incident was disclosed by a senior British officer
at a conference in London last week and is reported in today's edition
of Defence Analysis. The identity of the officer is not given.
-
- "Some Iranian border and observation posts were
re-positioned over the border, broadly a kilometre into Iraq," a Ministry
of Defence spokesman said.
-
- The incident began last July when Revolutionary Guards
pushed about a kilometre into Iraq to the north and east of Basra in an
apparent attempt to reoccupy territory which they claimed belonged to Iran.
-
- Lt Gen Ricardo Sanchez then ordered the British to prepare
to send in several thousand troops to attack the Revolutionary Guard positions.
-
- The Revolutionary Guard Corps has 125,000 soldiers, making
it 25 per cent larger than the entire British Army, and is equipped with
500 tanks, 600 armoured personnel carriers and 360 artillery weapons.
-
- The incident is reminiscent of the exchange during the
Kosovo conflict between the American general, Wesley Clark, the supreme
allied commander Europe, and Gen Sir Mike Jackson, the British commander.
-
- When Gen Clark told Gen Jackson to send British troops
into Pristina airport to prevent Russian troops from taking control Gen
Jackson refused. He was reported to have said: "I am not going to
start World War Three for you."
-
- The Iran-Iraq incident lasted around a week and was resolved
by a telephone conversation between Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary,
and Kamal Kharrazi, his Iranian counterpart, British officials said.
-
- "It did look rather nasty at the time," one
official said. "But we were always confident it was a mistake and
could be resolved by diplomatic means. We got in touch with Baghdad and
said, 'Don't do anything silly; we are talking to the Iranians.' "
-
- While Mr Straw was trying to resolve the issue peacefully,
British military commanders on the ground were calming their Iranian counterparts,
the ministry said.
-
- The Revolutionary Guard was believed to be behind the
seizure of eight Royal Navy and Royal Marines personnel last week after
they strayed across the disputed border between Iraq and Iran.
-
- The eight men, who were delivering patrol boats to the
Iraqi riverine patrol service, were released - but not before they were
paraded blindfolded on Iranian television.
-
- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/06/30/wiran30.xml
-
-
- PNAC - Regime Change for Iran
- 2-24-4
-
- We would like to draw your attention to the following
op-ed by Michael McFaul and Abbas Milani in yesterday's Wall Street Journal
("Solidarity with Iran"). In the face of Iranian clerics' assault
on the democratic process leading up to Iran's recent parliamentary elections,
the authors argue that it is time for the Bush administration to demonstrate
that its commitment to democracy in the Middle East extends to U. S. policy
toward Iran.
-
- http://www.newamericancentury.org/iran-20040224.htm
|
