- Can Ron Paul win the presidency? The answer is definitely
yes, based on a popular vote but Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000 and
we still got his opponent, a psychopathic war criminal, as president, who
was solely in the race because he was himself the son of a psychopathic
war criminal (and a former president). So I'm not sure why we have a popular
vote. Most Americans do not fully understand the Electoral College, and
I'm one of them. It's the Electoral College that elects the president.
-
- Today, we have an added obstacle to electing someone
we like and that is the way the vote is counted. The apparent idea behind
computerized vote fraud is to justify the votes of those mysterious people
who purportedly decide the winner, the Electoral College. How are these
electors assigned to their jobs, other than by their good connections and
their willingness to follow orders?
-
- Further and unexpected obstacles can develop quickly
when the Chosen One looks to be losing, as we saw with the rescue of GW
Bush by five members of the Supreme Court, who ordered the end of the Florida
vote re-count in the last hour. When other countries do this, we refer
to the five members as a "junta." The news corporations very
decently refrained from embarrassing the winner and his brother, who happened
to be the governor of Florida, by any messy investigation into computerized
vote fraud, or exactly how the Judicial Branch could shut down a general
election and declare the winner of an Executive Branch contest.
-
- Pat Buchannan won the early GOP primaries in 1996, including
the Arizona primary, but then the computers were adjusted properly; his
announced Arizona victory was corrected and he won no more. Buchannan
proved to be a good sport and never complained about the three or four
little private companies that count the ballots in secret ways, or who
owns the little private companies. But imagine: obscure little private
companies counting the votes with their private little computer programs.
All the votes. When they were asked exactly how they count the ballots
with their computers, the little company owners were indignant, claiming
that their programs were proprietary, and to divulge their workings would
damage their position in the market! This was accepted at face value.
The news corporations didn't investigate the little companies because,
it turns out, the little companies are owned by the news corporations themselves.
-
- The latest GOP debate demonstrated how an entire political
party can be reduced to fringe status by a private company, CNN, taking
"YouTube" questions from religious fruitcakes, gun nuts and racists,
or actors portraying them. CNN's first home-grown question to Ron Paul
was an effort to tie him to people such as myself: Do you really believe
in a conspiracy by the Council on Foreign Relations?
-
- The neat thing about Ron Paul is his ability to hit the
slimiest, spit-coated slider out of the park, every time, on the first
pitch. And the suspense has become very entertaining: both his supporters
and his enemies wonder how long the fraudsters can go without giving him
his first trick question, though it must be unnerving to his malefactors
who are undoubtedly considering more drastic ways to shut him up.
-
- It took this writer many years before he could understand
the method behind the madness of the Bush gangsters. Now that they are
about gone, I'm getting it. It was difficult to come to grips with this
concept, probably for philosophical reasons. Ron Paul may have the same
problem. It is a very simple program and it is called "Privatization."
-
- For someone who is basically an anarchist, who despises
government, or even someone who is a libertarian, the idea of "privatizing"
functions that the government shouldn't be doing sounds attractive. And
many libertarians have called for just about everything to be turned over
to private companies, which they think can perform most if not all government
jobs more efficiently. Bush and Cheney have shown us, however, just how
dangerous this idea is when it is implemented by criminals who are not
only greedy but psychopathic.
-
- Actually, the idea of privatizing certain government
functions goes all the way back to Alexander Hamilton, whose plan was to
privatize the central bank, the First Bank of the United States, that is,
to place the credit and currency needs of this country in the hands of
private bankers, who would make highly profitable loans to the government.
To the Southerners who objected to this Northern monopoly on the money
supply, Hamilton said, "What the government could do for a person
(incorporate), it could not refuse to do for an "artificial person",
a business. And the Bank of the United States, being privately owned and
not a government agency, is a business." George Washington signed
Hamilton's bill into law and we got the first privately-owned central bank,
which lasted from 1791 till 1811.
-
- This was followed by the Second Bank of the US, also
privately-owned (which failed due to Andrew Jackson's ordering its assets
taken from it and placed in State banks) and of course by the third version,
the privately-owned Federal Reserve Bank of 1913 to the present day. Ron
Paul would like to do to this RICO loan racket what Andy Jackson did to
its predecessor in 1832, although Paul may have a slightly better solution.
Considering that the Federal Reserve Note, the greatest fraud in US history,
is about to collapse, his solution had better be a good one and he better
start discussing it now. I'm sure that everyone would take his plan very
seriously.
-
- So that's the origin of Dick Cheney's secretive plan
for the privatization of government functions, which today has spread to
prisons, police and the military. The real purpose, besides huge profits
to the corporations, is no accountability, as we see in the privatized
counting of the vote. The Freedom of Information Act only applies to the
government, not Halliburton. Blackwater and the other mercenary companies
in the War on Terror receive obscenely high wages from the taxpayers but
are not under military rules of conduct, which aren't too strict in the
first place. The mercenaries, however, have exposed themselves as the
most lawless and bloodthirsty band of cutthroats in the entire Middle East
and are the real cause of hatred. How do you deal with officially green-lighted
private killers, other than taking them out of their cars and hanging them
from bridges?
-
- It has just been revealed, to me anyway, that the American
gangsters in Iraq, led by the Kissinger Associate L. Paul Bremer, had been
busily "privatizing" Iraqi industries by selling them off to
Americans and Europeans. In this case, the word "privatizing"
is a euphemism for "looting." Now we learn that the main reason
for Iraqi rage at Americans, besides our mass murder of two million of
them since 1991, is our massive theft of everything they owned, including
their oil, since 2003, under the guise of aggressive war. This is the
fruit of war crime.
-
- Part of Ron Paul's great appeal is in his mild-mannered
insistence that the president, the Congress and the Supreme Court follow
the rules of conduct as written in the US Constitution. Although I am
not a believer in the US Constitution, as explained in <http://www.rense.com/general79/patri.htm>http://www.rense.com/general79/patri.htm,
there is no denying that this would eliminate about seventy-five percent
of our immediate political and financial problems. There are so many Americans,
though, who are almost totally dependent on unconstitutional government
programs for their survival that Ron Paul may not appeal to enough actual
voters, if we believe that the vote actually counts. His main strength
right now is his unwavering and not so mild-mannered insistence that US
war mongering be ended NOW and the troops be brought home NOW, not just
from Iraq but from all 130 countries we are occupying around the world.
And that's better than any other candidate from either party, besides
Dennis Kucinich, the Democrat who also insists the troops be brought back
immediately. Kucinich has distinguished himself by introducing legislation
that would result in the immediate impeachment of Dick Cheney for a variety
of high crimes. He does not share Ron Paul's philosophy of the legitimate
functions of government.
-
- Right now, Ron Paul's base of popular support is astonishing
for a congressman who's been saying the same basic things for thirty years.
What's different this year? Mainly, it's the war. All the corporations
want war because war transfers the most money from our checking accounts
into the corporations' cash registers. Most of the people do not want
war, either for financial or moral reasons. Ron Paul is on the side of
the people and against the war-profiteers, which is a very dangerous place
to be. And he's trying to operate in this no-man's land in a very polite
way. The way he's being treated by the news corporations but keeps winning
is right out of a Frank Capra movie. The corporations intend to turn it
into a Brian DePalma movie next year, if not sooner.
-
- (Frank Capra debuted MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON at
the National Press Club in DC. He thought the reporters would get a kick
out of it. They were so angry and embarrassed that they nearly lynched
him.)
-
- Ron Paul probably understands that he is making some
deadly enemies. His own party hates him and would like to keep him out
of their circus sideshows that he has repeatedly ruined. His fundraising
ability has them terrified for next year because it's apparent he's going
to get all the money he'll ever need. He can't be bought off and he can't
be scared off and he's clean as a hound's tooth and has been married to
the same woman for fifty years. Plus he's a real doctor who helped bring
over 4,000 babies into the world. It really doesn't get any worse than
that, as far as his enemies are concerned. That was the problem with Jack
Kennedy: too good looking to beat and too rich to bribe. And Kennedy
also set about to destroy the Federal Reserve Corporation. So we should
prepare ourselves for a very nasty shock next year. Ron Paul is becoming
the new Jack Kennedy, in terms of popularity (not ethics). All kinds of
Americans with all kinds of politics recognize him as a true political
hero.
-
- In the meantime, Ron Paul might consider playing to his
strong suit, which is his premier position against US war and aggression.
-
- In the last century, the Washington warlords were Democrats.
Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson started the wars. Nowadays, it's
the Bushes (the Clintons are Bush operatives). Ron Paul can win the general
election, if not the GOP nomination, by calling for war crimes trials for
those responsible for waging aggressive war in Afghanistan and Iraq. It's
obvious that the GOP is not going to nominate Ron Paul under any circumstances.
But that doesn't mean that millions of Republicans won't vote for him
anyway, along with millions of anti-war Democrats. He's already turned
the system on its head with unprecedented donations. He can do the same
with write-ins on paper ballots, which could bring awareness of the corruption
of the computers.
-
- Our victims in the Moslem world have not chosen to try
to get even. There has been no terrorism by them against us anywhere due
to their basic good nature. Only a fool believes that Moslems were in
any way involved in 9-11 except as patsies. But that doesn't mean that
American war criminals shouldn't be punished for crimes against humanity
done in our names.
-
- Ron Paul is Mr. Nice Guy. There's no doubt that he is
a nice guy. But now he has to start showing some steel, some menace.
He is an accomplished physician with five years in the air force as a flight
surgeon. From this platform he can tell his countrymen the ugly facts
of American crimes against humanity in the Moslem world.
-
- He can explain in his kindly way that war crime is the
very worst crime that can be committed. "The United States developed
the harshest punishment for war criminals because these are the most dangerous
criminals on earth, who kill the most people under the color of their authority.
The Americans have hanged many Iraqi leaders accused of war crimes, most
if not all of them on false charges to prevent disclosure of past business
dealings with the American leaders.
-
- "Beyond these heinous murders, however, is the American
use of depleted uranium munitions. DU shells produce radioactive dust
and over four thousand tons of this deadly dust have settled on Iraqi soil,
never to go away. Here are the results (color photos of hideously deformed
infants and fetuses). In addition, here are photos of American infants
and fetuses of American soldiers who are also dying from breathing our
DU dust and passing on deformed DNA to their children and spouses and doctors
and nurses.
-
- "The people responsible for this permanent living
nightmare must be brought to justice. America has the responsibility for
this death and suffering and the traditional American punishment for war
crime has to be applied to those found guilty in war crimes trials, which
should be convened immediately. The same war criminals who have done this
are right now planning to attack yet another Moslem country with even more
terrible nuclear weapons, the kind that explode with megatons of destructive
energy.
-
- "As a physician I took an oath, which was: First,
do no harm. The best way I can accomplish this is as the leader of the
United States who will bring home all military personnel whom we have put
in harm's way, and to make sure that they will never be sent overseas to
wage aggressive war against people that do not threaten us. And as a congressman
I took an oath to protect this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic.
I have found no more dedicated enemies than the so-called 'neo-conservatives'
who have guided this administration from its first day in power, the ones
who assured us that aggressive war against Islam would be good for America."
-
- Ron Paul would also capture the public's total support
by stating his plan to declare null and void all Orwellian legislation
recently passed by Congress and signed by Bush. Any government employee
who not only practices torture but would justify it would be subject to
prosecution for assault, murder and war crime, as applicable.
-
- Another major crime against the people is counterfeiting
as practiced by the private corporation known as the Federal Reserve System.
America is facing the loss of ninety percent of the value of its currency,
according to reports. This crime, which has destroyed so many lives, requires
penalties as harsh as the above.
-
- It is good that Ron Paul stands for bringing the troops
home, for privacy, for civilized behavior and sound money. But to prove
it and to show his capacity for leadership, he should consider taking these
positions as soon as possible.
-
-
|
