rense.com

PM Claims Landing Gear
Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole

By Jon Carlson
carlson.jon@att.net
3-9-5
 
HOLE TRUTH: Flight 77's landing gear punched a 12-ft. hole into the Pentagon's Ring C.
 
 
 
 
 
In CONSTRUCTION TERMINOLOGY 'punch-out' refers to making an opening in a wall to access the inside contents of the wall or the inner room. What is the evidence that the WALL OPENING next to the road that runs inside the Pentagon was actually made by a backhoe? (Fullsize photo)
 
 
 
 
The red writing on the right side of the opening "Punch OUt" is the big giveaway. The orange circled 'V's directed the backhoe operator to make the opening within the V's. Note the orange arrow on left edge of the opening. The bricks on the edges have been clawed away from outside by backhoe teeth. IT IS CRYSTAL-CLEAR that this wall opening was made by contruction workers needing to access the inner Pentagon NOT by a landing gear as claimed by Popular Mechanics. Would somebody tell Popular Mechanics?
 
Pentagon construction contractors have the FINAL WORD:
http://www.patriotresource.com/wtc/federal/0915/DoD.html
This pile here is all Pentagon metal. None of that is aircraft whatsoever. As you can see, they've punched a hole in here. This was punched by the rescue workers to clean it out. You can see this is the -- some of the unrenovated areas where the windows have blown out.
 
This is a hole in -- there was a punch-out. They suspect that this was where a part of the aircraft came through this hole, although I didn't see any evidence of the aircraft down there.
 
 
KARL SCHWARZ has the big Pentagon picture:
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205Schwarz/020205schwarz.html
Visit www.karlschwarz.com for the big 9/11 picture and more.
 
DON'T MISS:
 
PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago
http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm
 
Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo?
http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm
 
Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified?
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
 
Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos
http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm
 
http://www.popularmecom/science/defense/1227842.html?page=6&c=y
 
 
 
Comment
Russell Pickering
russellpickering@bresnan.net
3-11-5
 
Pentagon Exit Hole
This response to Jon Carlson's article "PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole" is in no way intended to attack Jon for his work on the exit hole. I tried to contact Jon before this response and my emails were returned with some delivery problem. I finally sent several emails and this review to Jon that did not get returned. I can't say if he received them, but I have had no response from him. There are a couple of factual corrections I would like to propose. The exit hole was 9' in diameter 
(http://www.aesvn.org/resources/Pentagon-Shoring.pdf )
and it was not caused by a backhoe.
 
The exit hole is very important evidence to indicate a government cover-up because it can't be explained by an aircraft hitting the building. Witnesses claimed it was caused by the incident on 9/11. The markings on the wall (see photo at bottom) to which Jon refers are international rescue symbols, not backhoe directions. The "V" indicates a victim has been located. If there is a line through the V (an upside down "A") that indicates the victim is deceased. If there is a circle around it, that means the victim has been removed (see graphics at bottom). Following is the first known photo of the exit hole. The photo was taken before hose lines were even laid. No backhoe or aircraft parts are apparent. If the backhoe operator was directed to the hole by the symbols on the wall, where are the symbols in this photo? The symbols would have had to have been there first. Also, if they had a backhoe there they would have had protective fire lines and there would most likely be people and hose lines in this photo. My final point is that the debris pile doesn't impress me as having been placed by a backhoe. It would have been piled to one side or the other, not right in front of the hole. I don't think we can dismiss the exit hole with "natural causation" as an explanation.
 
 
 
PHOTO SOURCE:
 
In Jon's link "Pentagon construction contractors have the FINAL WORD"
there seems to be conflicting statements.
 
There were two made by Terry Mitchell (Chief, Audiovisual Division, Office of ASD PA) who contradicted himself, and one by Lee Evey (Pentagon Renovation Manager) that contradicts one of Mitchell's statements.
 
MITCHELL: "You can see someone from the Montgomery County unit here. This pile here is all Pentagon metal. None of that is aircraft whatsoever. As you can see, they've punched a hole in here. This was punched by the rescue workers to clean it out. You can see this is the -- some of the unrenovated areas where the windows have blown out."
 
But in the same press conference (see previous link) only three statements prior he said:
MITCHELL: "It's more to the right of where we were at. This is the -- this is in a renovated section on the opposite side, if you were facing the opposite side. This is a hole in -- there was a punch-out. They suspect that this was where a part of the aircraft came through this hole, although I didn't see any evidence of the aircraft down there."
 
At the time Mitchell was referring to photos taken after the clean-up. He saw the term "punch out" painted on the wall and may have mistaken its meaning. I spoke with a member of another task force that was on the scene (who requests anonymity) about the meaning of the term "punch out". It is not an official term. It was arbitrarily used to name the location of the alleged aircraft's exit hole. The terms "punch out" and "exit hole" are used interchangeably in various reports. The report on shoring refers to it as an "exit wound" as well. But since Mitchell contradicted himself within three statements in the same press conference, I have to assume he was either mistaken or just confused. The following statement by Lee Evey (Pentagon Renovation Manager) in the same article says:
 
EVEY: "The rings are E, D, C, B and A. Between B and C is a driveway that goes around the Pentagon. It's called A-E Drive. The airplane traveled in a path about like this, and the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C ring into A-E Drive."
 
My opinion is that it was not the nose of an aircraft. For more analysis of the exit hole you can visit my site. The following graphics demonstrate the use of the rescue symbols. The source is at the bottom.
 
 
 
 
 
Here is the .pdf to reference these graphics.
 
 
 
The "MD TF-1" is for Maryland Task Force 1. The arrow would be pointing to bodies and body parts inside the exit hole.
 
Russell Pickering
russellpickering@bresnan.net
 


Disclaimer






MainPage
http://www.rense.com


This Site Served by TheHostPros